Tired Tyres
Premium
- 12,593
- West Yorkshire
- Tired_Tyres
- Tired Tyres
Not too much doubt now.First 2 spots are looking pretty solid now with 20 minutes left. Bottom of the podium could still be in doubt.
Not too much doubt now.First 2 spots are looking pretty solid now with 20 minutes left. Bottom of the podium could still be in doubt.
First 2 spots are looking pretty solid now with 20 minutes left. Bottom of the podium could still be in doubt.
I can only see that as a step in the right direction.SRO could take over Australian GT: https://sportscar365.com/other-series/australian-gt/report-sro-poised-for-australian-gt-takeover/
Thoughts from down under?
Yes please.
It's just not promoted well here, since ownership switched. There were about 11 cars last year. The Quinns ran a tight ship and it was good for the series. It didn't help that V8/VASC did try to sabotage the series with race dates and banning Supercars drivers in the B12H.But, GTWC America is all but dead. The Touring Car and GT4 series' are still pretty healthy, but COVID really was a kick in the teeth for the series. I don't think any race ran with more than 10 GT3 cars.
I watched World Challenge since the Speedvision days, up until the time I left the states(2008). It was always great racing.Let’s be honest. The Pirelli World Challenge was just better than the American Blancpain series. It’s probably the one racing series I miss the most that’s now (sort of) defunct.
Let’s be honest. The Pirelli World Challenge was just better than the American Blancpain series. It’s probably the one racing series I miss the most that’s now (sort of) defunct.
I understood why they made the switch to GT3 (starting even before the SRO takeover), but they failed to realize that GT3 cars were too expensive for many of their competitors. Was a time when you could buy the Viper Competition Coupe and immediately be competitive. Oh, how I miss that car.
World Challenge was great when it was a much production class. When it followed the rules in many of the SCCA club classes. Kept costs low and participation very high. Why the Touring Car classes in GT4 America are huge.
Yeah the even more older stuff was pretty great, but even during the GT3-era you got some really interesting cars showing up like the Volvo S60s, the Cadillac ATS-V that were made specifically for the series were some of the coolest GT cars ever made in my opinion. Not to mention you'd get decently sized grids most years.
But yeah, imagine if the sort of cost-effective formula was continued today. I wonder what kind of cars we would have seen being made out of stock vehicles from the 2010s.
The car in my pic is totally production based. Between old school WC Audi RS6 and WC TC. More like GT4 spec.The CTS-V was a better example as the ATS-V was an actual GT3 car. I believe it did get run in Europe at one point.
RealTime Racing coming up with the rear wheel drive (might've even been AWD) TLX-GT.
The series did have a Mustang win the title in '09 as well.
The series had become a bit like the GT300 class in Japan. Rules where fairly open to seem to cater to a less-tradition sportscar, unlike the European GT series at the time. You had the Porsche's (what GT class doesn't?), but you didn't see many Ferrari's, Aston's, Lambo's, or the array of small builders we saw in British GT.
With the GT300 Mother Chassis, maybe we will see more of these odd, but spectacular cars back. Like the Crown in @05XR8's avatar pic.
I also liked the IMSA era, when the M5 used to run. Closer to production based the better. It's one of the many reasons why I dig the car in my avatar.
Probably meant for the SuperGT thread, but with the switch to GT3 in DTM, will we see Honda switch back to a mid engine car? Though, with the other manufacturers having to invest so much in the turbo I-4’s, will the series just make them wait until the next rules adjustment?
I think you misunderstood. @HaydenFan69 was wondering, now that DTM has dropped Class One regulations, if Honda will revert back to a mid-engine layout for their GT500 NSX.The front-engined NSX is for GT500 only which is Class One and DTM abandones it for next year. Honda already has a working GT3 car that just won the championship in IMSA GTD. Why would they need to change anything? In fact, there are mid-engined NSX GT3s in Super GT’s GT300 field already.
EDIT: some wording and extra info
I think you misunderstood. @HaydenFan69 was wondering, now that DTM has dropped Class One regulations, if Honda will revert back to a mid-engine layout for their GT500 NSX.
It’s an interesting point to make. While reverting back to mid-engine would regain a semblance of road relevance, it would be a very resourceful job especially while trying to remain on a level playing field with Nissan and Toyota.
Honda doesn't sell an FR NSX. Even though Honda did run an FR(HSV) they never sold. The point is, Being DTM are no longer running parallel with Super GT, there's no reason to use Class One regulations. Super GT500 and GT300(DTM) won't be competing on the same level. No other counry run Class oNe regulations. Therefore, Honda can(if JAF allow) switch back to MR.