GT Sport - Trailers, Videos and Screenshots

  • Thread starter sk8er913
  • 17,667 comments
  • 2,103,307 views
If it's only slightly improvements, what would be the point in buying a ps4 neo? IMO, there must be a big gap betwen the two versions. Maybe the biggest change will be the PSVR mode.

If I had to hazard a guess, probably a similar skill set to the Xbox One S vs the original One: 4K playback and HDR compatibility. And, as others have mentioned, to aid in the performance of VR.

If there's a big gap, Sony risks alienating the existing (quite large) PS4 fanbase. It's a tightrope act.
 
Unless disaster, GTS will not be delayed. PoDi has also reconfirmed date at the conference in Hong Kong.

Here's to that!👍

When GT6 released, a fair amount of people were sure that'd be the case for a PS4 GT game, too.

If GT Sport is Neo compatible, it won't vary too much from the regular PS4 version, based on all the leaked info relating to Neo so far. Slightly improved performance, sure, but no exclusive features. If Sony is pushing it as a system that works in the existing PS4 ecosystem, it can't very well have something like variable weather if the the vanilla version doesn't, since players from both systems are supposedly going to be able to play against one another.

Has this been confirmed somewhere? I was under the impression that the Neo would be a significant improvement over the existing the PS4.

If it's only slightly improvements, what would be the point in buying a ps4 neo? IMO, there must be a big gap betwen the two versions. Maybe the biggest change will be the PSVR mode.

I am wondering the same thing. The Sony and Xbox consoles may not even be worth it if there is no difference in the software.
 
Patrick Kliepert said they might improve the specs a bit (probably improve RAM and maybe overclock) but anyway GTSport's new conversion shouldn't be too much of a hassle.
 
If it's only slightly improvements, what would be the point in buying a ps4 neo? IMO, there must be a big gap betwen the two versions. Maybe the biggest change will be the PSVR mode.

I already made a prediction when PS4 neo rumors were leaked that it would run the GTS at 90fps. It will probably look little sharper, may be better aa or texture filtering. IMO Neo existence to get the performance up without compensating the gfx fidelity and complement PSVR. I hope that is the case. I really do not care about 4K BS. Even 9tera flop gfx cards cannot run modern games at max settings, 4K with smooth fps.
 
I already made a prediction when PS4 neo rumors were leaked that it would run the GTS at 90fps. It will probably look little sharper, may be better aa or texture filtering. IMO Neo existence to get the performance up without compensating the gfx fidelity and complement PSVR. I hope that is the case. I really do not care about 4K BS. Even 9tera flop gfx cards cannot run modern games at max settings, 4K with smooth fps.
Since when is "max settings" the only benchmark? You don't necessarily need to max out AA for example with a 4k screen as it's often unnecessary and a big fps eater. People are already playing modern games at 4k on existing graphics cards with solid frame rates and are quite happy with it.
 
If I had to hazard a guess, probably a similar skill set to the Xbox One S vs the original One: 4K playback and HDR compatibility. And, as others have mentioned, to aid in the performance of VR.

If there's a big gap, Sony risks alienating the existing (quite large) PS4 fanbase. It's a tightrope act.
About HDR, the Scapes will be HDR compatible. (Espanol : http://www.eurogamer.es/articles/gran-turismo-sport-avance_7 )
 
There is a thread to talk about that?

Cpcy-9EUsAAnwF1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Since when is "max settings" the only benchmark? You don't necessarily need to max out AA for example with a 4k screen as it's often unnecessary and a big fps eater. People are already playing modern games at 4k on existing graphics cards with solid frame rates and are quite happy with it.

According to steam survey 1080P is most popular setting. Those who invest on 1000$ gfx cards and want to play latest games at highest setting. There is a fraction of people who use 4K monitor and can game on it. I would say it will take at least 3-4years before 4K becomes the next 1080P.
 
I would say it will take at least 3-4years before 4K becomes the next 1080P.
I'm not sure. 4K is absolutely massive compared to 1080HD, and I don't think it will become the norm for at least 5 years, because the amount of power that's needed to keep a 4K resolution display going is really quite large. I'm not saying that people won't touch the tech for another 5 years, what I am saying is that there's still a long way to go before everyone has access.
 
I do think so, there's a lot of people that just bought a 1080p TV now and i doubt that they want to buy another one again anytime soon.

And, i don't that find think that there's that much of content in 4K to justify a 4K TV for the majority of people. I know that Netflix have some movies in that resolution and gamming, other than that, i can't recall.
 
I'm not sure. 4K is absolutely massive compared to 1080HD, and I don't think it will become the norm for at least 5 years, because the amount of power that's needed to keep a 4K resolution display going is really quite large. I'm not saying that people won't touch the tech for another 5 years, what I am saying is that there's still a long way to go before everyone has access.
In terms of gaming, it'll only take off when the price of cards capable of 4k come down to a level that is affordable for the masses and affordable for consoles. PS5 will probably be the next giant leap.
 
I would rather concentrate on making games 1080p on rock steady 60fps with bigger field of view.
Also 21:9 aspect ratio is even nicer to look at. (i have 2560x1080 monitor and all games look better and you see much more)

4K can be accomplished by the time PS6 comes at around 2025. VR is nonsense unless its wired straight to the brain (no helmets and such)
 
In terms of gaming, it'll only take off when the price of cards capable of 4k come down to a level that is affordable for the masses and affordable for consoles.
Depends on what you mean by 'taking off'. The new Titan X can do just about any modern, demanding game at 4k/60fps with near max settings and as always, that sort of performance will be available for $300-400 within one or two years. And that price point is fairly well represented in the PC market. I think even as of 2015, there were over ten million users with GTX970/R9 290-minimum level PC's out there, which is quite a lot. So it certainly wont be long before 4k becomes popularized on the PC scene.

PS5 will probably be the next giant leap.
I think the Xbox Scorpio will probably bring genuine, native 4k gaming to console users by the end of next year. Its stated target specs should put it pretty much right in the ballpark for 4k/30fps with reasonably high settings.

PS5 generation will certainly bring about the next 'giant leap' in terms of the raw graphics involved, though.
 
But it does look like there are some trees missing...

Angle or not, it looks like every tree in this picture is at least 15 years younger in game than in the real life picture.

It's not like I'm going to play the game anyway, so I don't really care in the end, but I thought it was fairly more obvious and certainly more concerning than flat-ish curbs.

curb-4-png.575382
 
Angle or not, it looks like every tree in this picture is at least 15 years younger in game than in the real life picture.

It's not like I'm going to play the game anyway, so I don't really care in the end, but I thought it was fairly more obvious and certainly more concerning than flat-ish curbs.

curb-4-png.575382
How are a few less trees in the background off track more concerning than flattish curbs that are on track and quite integral to the driving experience??
 
Back