- 5,065
- Fort Worth
- That_sneaky_azN
Dude.In decenber whe have a news about gt sport?
Be patient.
We don't really know anything else about GTS yet over here.
Dude.In decenber whe have a news about gt sport?
Don't be sorry. I am guessing English is not your first language and you are doing the best you can.ok so im sorry
you can move it to a new thread if you want, im just trying to keep it updated with the times, now that we have the first trailer, now what.To be fair, most of this thread doesn't belong in this thread.
I don't think anyone was making fun of your EnglishWell, english isn't my first language, almost all my experience with the language is this forum, musics, movies and games. So, make fun of my mistake.
Well, english isn't my first language, almost all my experience with the language is this forum, musics, movies and games. So, make fun of my mistake.
And yes, i read all you wrote... but that don't change my opnion.
Yes, i do think that there's better sims than GT, but as a game, for me it is the best racing/driving/drifting/car game outhere. When i'm playing it, i do feel the difference between the cars, i do have fun while playing it. For me, thats enough.
I happen to agree, I think that GT was and is good as a semi-sim. Realistic enough to be believable, but not so much that it gets in the way of the fun of just driving for those who aren't quite as skilled.
Gran Turismo's approach to a racing game may be the best, because it offers a wider range of play. But it's not a better oval racing sim than iRacing, it's not a better road racing sim than AC, and it's not a better rally sim than RBR or Dirt Rally. It's jack of all trades, master of none, as has been said many times. That maybe makes it a better game, but it does not in any form make it a better simulation.
That GT chooses to limit the fidelity of their physics model to focus on things like graphics is a design choice, and frankly a pretty good one. As demonstrated adequately in the last couple of pages, most people can't tell good physics apart from great physics, and so it would be largely wasted effort.
Which is exactly the clever thing that GT does. How good do your physics have to be before the vast majority of people can't tell the difference between them and AC/iRacing or whatever the current top consumer grade sim is? GT apparently hits it pretty much dead on, with regularity.
Trying so hard to prove that GT is bad game, and game A or B is better etc.
No matter what kind of atrocity someother say, they like it only because they are attacking/saying something bad about GT.
He mentined penso on the post, though.Impossible to tell for sure, but the comment about reading what I wrote almost certainly was directed at me.
Sounds like you are just trying too hard to ensure the outcome is, "GT is the best simulator". As I said earlier, real life is the test. In your example above you are talking about the tire model and you'll have a tough time trying to convince anyone that understands real car behaviour, that GT's tire model stands up well against any current sim. That's not to say that GT isn't fun to drive or that it doesn't feel good or that it isn't challenging etc..but those things aren't the measure of simulation, reality is.
Yes, i do think that there's better sims than GT, but as a game, for me it is the best racing/driving/drifting/car game outhere. When i'm playing it, i do feel the difference between the cars, i do have fun while playing it. For me, thats enough.
He mentined penso on the post, though.
Probably.
It's amusing how often someone neglects to actually read what I write, just because they assume that they already know.
Most people in other countries that English isn't common try to speak it because some members here don't know their homeland's language. Not really their fault English is new to them.Umm, I don't mean to be rude here but How many on the forums don't know how to speak English or at least don't know how to spell the words
I get that, but then again, how did they get to the site? and how did they sign up? Unless the site is in their native language for them, I don't see how they managed to do that and not know how to properly write it at least.Most people in other countries that English isn't common try to speak it because some members here don't know their homeland's language. Not really their fault English is new to them.
Can't really give an answer to those type of questions...maybe a moderator can explain..I get that, but then again, how did they get to the site? and how did they sign up? Unless the site is in their native language for them, I don't see how they managed to do that and not know how to properly write it at least.
Another comparison between GT6 and GTSport.
Honestly, this is why I consider PD the king of 3D modeling. 6 months very well spent for this (even if it's a comparision between the NC-ND Miata)!!!
That too!!It's the lighting they're kings at more than anything. Anyone skilled in the craft can really create an accurate model and do a relatively good job with the texturing, but it's the lighting engine that really makes the difference.
Comparing two different generation of car is a poor comparison.
The lighting is going to be different. One is parked at a massive solar facility, outside, and the other is parked in a nicely lit indoor room.
I'd say the strong direct light from Gema Solar in the GT6 picture is the poor thing about it since it blows the materials.
Another comparison between GT6 and GTSport.
There's a lot more than 256 colors there. Probably a 16bit gif, 65536 colors.Then again, it's not the best image to compare materials and lighting either because it's a GIF and thus limited to 256 colours. It's 20XX, use something modern like WebM already!