- 4,101
- California
- Sk8er913
I don't think that koalafies as "something."Don't be sad bro, at least it's something
I don't think that koalafies as "something."Don't be sad bro, at least it's something
Yoshida confirms that Sony wanted to show just indies and tier party.
Source (in French) : http://www.gameblog.fr/news/55207-playstation-experience-yoshida-s-explique-sur-le-manque-de-g
WOnder where @amar212 is
Its all in the hands of Whistle Snap nowAmar won't be leaking/hinting stuff anymore out of respect to Polyphony.
You know nothing he says is serious...Its all in the hands of Whistle Snap now
Amar won't be leaking/hinting stuff anymore out of respect to Polyphony.
Its Sony decision not PD. Yoshida already say that PSX was for indie and third part games... Except Unchared that is already in Beta test...
Indeed,but hey it's not so bad. It just makes MLB more unique....I'm a bit sad that everyone seems to forget MLB The Show '16 being shown off too. That's a first party, AAA annual release.
...And yes, I enjoy Baseball. More than motorsports.
Amar won't be leaking/hinting stuff anymore out of respect to Polyphony.
When did he say that? he literally leaked GT Sport this year.
Well I'd rather that happen instead of being fed stuff we won't actually receive.Basically, he's only going to give hints/info when he knows it's 100% factual.
Basically, he's only going to give hints/info when he knows it's 100% factual.
ISn't that what he always did?
Not really, as I said above before GT6 was announced he posted some cryptic riddle that pointed to it being on PS4. Then obviously it wasn't the case and he said something changed. Can't remember exactly.
Probably also didn't anticipate the sales of GT6 taking such a large hit because I don't think they expected the PS4 to sell like hotcakes either. Oh well, things happen that can't be predicted.
I'm sure they couldn't with the game because GT6 wasn't nearly finished because they wanted to "start from scratch" supposably. Also it isn't that simple to just release a sequel that they knew themselves wasn't done in a earlier stage than when it was when we got it in our hands.GT6 was right to be a PS3 title, but it should have came out (as I suggest years ago and not in hindsight) Q4 2012 and support (updates etc) of the title should have stopped shortly after the PS4's release.
Really not that simple with the size of the staff...sure they are expanding,but we don't know currently how much. Could be a small or big expansion of the staff right now.And GT7 PS4 should have been in our hands by now.
I would say their decision making is incompetent and how they execute it as well,but it's not like they haven't considered or haven't heard the criticisms of the past 2 GT games,but they have shown what other developers aren't doing so much right now like free tracks or updates that include features that could be charged as DLC.Polyphony is incompetent and its starting to show in the sales of their games.
Long history of bad decision making??? Sure maybe the generation of the PS3 yes,but not like PD have done wrong for most of the time PD has been around.Theres very few 'honest mistakes' here. Its just a long sad history of one bad decision after another.
What part of GT6 started from scratch? lol.I'm sure they couldn't with the game because GT6 wasn't nearly finished because they wanted to "start from scratch" supposably. Also it isn't that simple to just release a sequel that they knew themselves wasn't done in a earlier stage than when it was when we got it in our hands.
They are hardly the pioneer for free DLC. While it is a very nice gesture, it didn't really amount to anything that different then what some of it's competition was/is doing. The time schedule was pretty bad as well.I would say their decision making is incompetent and how they execute it as well,but it's not like they haven't considered or haven't heard the criticisms of the past 2 GT games,but they have shown what other developers aren't doing so much right now like free tracks or updates that include features that could be charged as DLC.
Which is irrelevant to the point.Long history of bad decision making??? Sure maybe the generation of the PS3 yes,but not like PD have done wrong for most of the time PD has been around.
Uhh a couple things like physics,lighting,real world tracks looking more realistic since they laser scan world tracks now,etc..I mean you can't pretend things haven't been refined and such.What part of GT6 started from scratch? lol.
Maybe so,but free DLC offered without warning is neat eitherway and yes the schedule was done terribly with GT6,but that is the one who holds management fault.They are hardly the pioneer for free DLC. While it is a very nice gesture, it didn't really amount to anything that different then what some o
f it's competition was/is doing. The time schedule was pretty bad as well.
It could have yes.This game very much could have the potential
But not everyone feels that way. We aren't the majority.but I can't help but feel like the ball is being dropped.
Yes.Even taking into consideration how early it is, as well as the lack of information, it is something that is hard to just not think about.
No.physics
No.lighting
Subjective.real world tracks looking more realistic
None of which where started from scratch. Only one being laser scanned tracks, if they where scanned after GT5. Which I don't think was much?Uhh a couple things like physics,lighting,real world tracks looking more realistic since they laser scan world tracks now,etc..I mean you can't pretend things haven't been refined and such.
I agree that it is a nice gesture, but like I said, free dlc is not something that only PD does. Lot's of companies have done this, and still do this.Maybe so,but free DLC offered without warning is neat eitherway and yes the schedule was done terribly with GT6,but that is the one who holds management fault.
Yeah, that's why it's my opinion.But not everyone feels that way. We aren't the majority.
What part of GT6 started from scratch? lol.
Anywhere I can read up on that? Your use of the word probably doesn't instill much faith from that post.The framework of the game was started from scratch. The reason was to make the game easier to maintain and update.
The lighting was new as well, although they probably didn't build it themselves.
Certain aspects of the physics were probably started from scratch as well, such as suspension, aerodynamics and racing tyres.
And probably a lot more as well. Generally speaking it's often easier to write new code than to modify old code, mainly because when writing new code you can design the system to meet your goals. When you modify old code it's often the reverse: you need to change your goals to meet the system.
Anywhere I can read up on that? Your use of the word probably doesn't instill much faith from that post.
Okay.No.
No.
Subjective.
Okay.None of which where started from scratch. Only one being laser scanned tracks, if they where scanned after GT5. Which I don't think was much?
I agree that it is a nice gesture, but like I said, free dlc is not something that only PD does. Lot's of companies have done this, and still do this.
Yeah, that's why it's my opinion.