I'm not a mogul either but I have seen and been part of racing for more than 30 years and there are only a few pics entered that could come close to being "realistic". Most of them look like they are a video still. I know that's what they are but I thought the point was for them NOT to look like that. The one thing that I'm seeing in this thread is a lot of the same pics hashed and rehashed. Looks to me that almost half of the pics posted for this comp could possibly be the same "shot" from a different angle. If I were judging this thing (which I know I'm not and probably never will) I would toss about half of the entries for un-originality. Yes, the quality of the ones entrered is FAR better than I could ever hope to produce. But, come on guys how about some originality. There are a few that show some originality.
felix2107's entry for example. That pic is one of if not the most original pics in the lot. Just out of curiousity
Speedthrill, you say that
Easy$$ changed the colors not sure what you mean by that because the colors look dead on to me. The last time I saw Red Bull colors in real life there isn't any noticable difference and the same with the Alfa (Yes, I have seen both in real life). So it seems to me that that statement is unjust. If you use the right filters and such in Photoshop you can produce an awsome looking picture. It's all in knowing how. So, I don't think it's just to say someone has done something that can't be done within the "rules" just because they know HOW to use those tools to achieve the fullest effect that the particular tools can produce.
I'll probably get flamed for this post since I'm not entered and even if I did, I wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in a hot place. But, I just felt compelled to put in my two (or three) cents worth.
And to all those that have entered....GOOD LUCK!