GT4 WRS Week 60 : "Three Diamonds Valley, stage II"

  • Thread starter Tedehur
  • 141 comments
  • 6,539 views
results board: 6 in and 18 to go. so far casio is fastest.
come on guys tell us your laptimes now!
if you have moral objections to publishing laptimes please PM me.
 
Me!
Division 2
T1 38.347
T2 1'14.060
SF 1'55.638

Neil
 
Hold on. Third correction of my time.

My time is 1'53.032.

First I wrote 1'12.176, which was actually my T2 time. Then was corrected back to 1'52.176, when I assumed I had a typo. Looking back in the archives, I now see my time is actually 1'53.032.

:lol: That's shocking. I'm ashamed to show my face in here!
 
Casio
Hold on. Third correction of my time.

My time is 1'53.032.

First I wrote 1'12.176, which was actually my T2 time. Then was corrected back to 1'52.176, when I assumed I had a typo. Looking back in the archives, I now see my time is actually 1'53.032.

:lol: That's shocking. I'm ashamed to show my face in here!

You have no idea how happy this makes me. not that I thrive on your typo's, rather, I've been stupified as to how I was .3 in front of you at T2, and lost by .5:scared: I couldnt imagine how my T3 couldve been that bad, it seemed good???
seriously, I was freaking out

My time: 1:52.696 - seems we ran nearly identical T3's
 
my time:

0:37,536
1:11,749
1:52,159

what a luck that casio's time was just a typo/mistake or what ever ^^
i like to have a bigger gap than 0,017sec :D
 
Brad, you suck! It's a good thing you didn't send in any of those final times... That would've upset a few people I'd assume!
Casio
Hold on. Third correction of my time.

My time is 1'53.032
And, I'm assuming you didn't spend too much time on it this week?
 
Bigracer. Any chance you could put the results up in a post?

My stupid PC won't open your word document.

:cheers:

Darren.
 
so i crunched the numbers. now i know what a tough job cyril must be having week after week. chapeau to him 👍 👍 👍
still 11 of the wrs players in luxy's leaderboard have to publish their L's.
nevertheless i updated my little matrix and added the points everybody is supposed to gain assuming i understand flatty's system and that the other 11 have not submitted.
sorry to superT but i don't know how to publish a word matrix on the web other than attaching it. any suggestions?
 

Attachments

  • results for wrs week 60.doc
    72.5 KB · Views: 13
KLR142
And, I'm assuming you didn't spend too much time on it this week?

Half an hour max. I had work, school, and my BC combo. So lots of stuff on my plate.
 
Casio
Half an hour max. I had work, school, and my BC combo. So lots of stuff on my plate.
Yeah, same here, only it was just work and BC... :) That was my seventh lap. Didn't catch it by my 12th or so, and submitted it. 👍
 
Personally, unless it really draws me in, I find now I don't spend more then 1 or 2 hours a week on any combo. This week didn't really appeal to me to be honest, nither did the last 'Three Diamonds Valley' race (Week 47), where I came pretty close to dead last :lol:

I've been here too long. Gone are the weeks where I spend 5+ hours on a combo (Notable races include Weeks 10,14,25,31,42,46...).
 
.doc updated. now in div1 it's madforce 1, shockwave 2 and casio 3.
i only need 10 more times to complete the list.
 
Casio
For those playing at home. 'Ceci n'est pas une pipe' translates to 'This is not a pipe'. It is a painting by Belgian surrealist René Magritte.

Actually. I was just trying to impress Cyril. I hope he notices!

~Brad

I saw your new avatar this morning and thought : "waow, Casio has discovered Magritte."
Although I graduated in chemistry, and work as a trainer and translator (from dutch to french) for a software company, I've always liked paintings. I'm not a big fan of surrealism, except for Magritte and Delvaux. (Sorry, but I've never understood what Picasso or Klee were trying to say in their paintings).

So for those who don't know Magritte : he painted a pipe with a sentence below saying "This is not a pipe", as he had painted an apple too with an equivalent sentence "This is not an apple".
His point was that no matter how skilled a painter can be, and how accurate one can paint an object or portrait, the painting will remain a representation of the model, and it can't be confused with the model itself.
So the pipe on the painting is indeed not a pipe. It's a bi-dimensional painted representation of a pipe.
 
Back