GT6 News Discussion

  • Thread starter Matty
  • 8,352 comments
  • 827,216 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it was @Jordan that published an image of that GPS thing showing data from the Streets of Willow Spring track
:)

Edit: GTPorsche said it first :D
 
Yes. At gran-turismo.com they have written:

So we can hope to get the other layouts of Willow Springs in future updates.
It's said that exact same thing since they first unveiled the main Willow Springs track. But the Streets of Willow we have seen was unofficial correct? Something Jordan posted Monday morning.
 
I was told they scanned everything on the Willow Springs property, but I don't recall seeing any other configurations in the menus. I would say the other courses haven't been re-created for the game yet or aren't ready.
 
I was told they scanned everything on the Willow Springs property, but I don't recall seeing any other configurations in the menus. I would say the other courses haven't been re-created for the game yet or aren't ready.
slightly off topic, but did you get to play around with the menus or were they just screenshots?
 
I was told they scanned everything on the Willow Springs property, but I don't recall seeing any other configurations in the menus. I would say the other courses haven't been re-created for the game yet or aren't ready.
Shouldn't you be getting ready for a party in Vegas instead of posting on a video game forum?:P

Have fun tonight.:cheers:
 
Yeah, most of the options and game features were "locked" though. We were told at the beginning of the event that it was the "full" version of the game, but I don't think that was really the case. I think what they actually meant was that the driving physics and graphics were in their final iteration before the game goes gold.
 
Yo. I'm finished this conversation. I made my point. You talk about getting personal then call me a PD apologist? :lol: Come on, now... You don't know what games I play besides GT. You don't need to know either. Keep believing your theories, thats fine. You switched up your talking point 3 times now. And ignore things shown, said and illustrated by PD. Case in point the aero model being used in GT6 being accurate enough to replicate the same behavior of his NISMO GT3 GTR at the Nurburgring. The information is readily available, if you choose to ignore it then say theres not enough information or detail, you're not worth carrying on a discussion with.

I simply asked for you to prove it with my actual quotes. How do we know that the aero will replicate the GT3 GTR? Have you seen models of the physics engine that we haven't? Or have you seen tuning set ups yet? If so can you provide concrete proof? Since you say it exist show me the proof that verifies.

Also I showed you proof of them not wanting to update certain features and you don't talk about that, but you want to run another double standard that I ignore you but it is okay for you to do it. I'm not ignoring you, I've given proof and concise rebuttals while you keeping doing :lol: and other back peddling. Just debate the dang subject.
 
Contradiction much? Also, you completely missed the point, which is that very little has happened at PD's sound department in the last 14 years.

The way people capture sound in any studio is the same as they did 14 years ago. All of the sound recording equipment and procedures are still the same.
 
I simply asked for you to prove it with my actual quotes. How do we know that the aero will replicate the GT3 GTR? Have you seen models of the physics engine that we haven't? Or have you seen tuning set ups yet? If so can you provide concrete proof? Since you say it exist show me the proof that verifies.

Also I showed you proof of them not wanting to update certain features and you don't talk about that, but you want to run another double standard that I ignore you but it is okay for you to do it. I'm not ignoring you, I've given proof and concise rebuttals while you keeping doing :lol: and other back peddling. Just debate the dang subject.
Talk to someone else about it I guess. I don't feel like doing this endless circle with you. I countered one point about you claiming they showed nothing significant about GT6. I proved they have. Then you change the talking point. I'm good. Have a nice day.
 
Last edited:
Anyone got anymore news on the deltawing wether it is in the game or not?
Not that I've heard. Just that there was a Patent dispute over the design (supposedly copied by the ZEOD) so until that is resolved, we probably won't hear anything.
 
Considering how abruptly it was removed, I assume PD was under a lawsuit menace from the current right holder. Thing will eventually get sorted in the future, but it will possibly take more than just a few days.
 
Considering how abruptly it was removed, I assume PD was under a lawsuit menace from the current right holder. Thing will eventually get sorted in the future, but it will possibly take more than just a few days.
I don't think it's anything to do with PD from what I can tell.
 
Isn’t it PD’s responsibility to make sure they are “ok” with any patented/copyrighted/trademarked asset featured in their game?:confused:
 
Isn’t it PD’s responsibility to make sure they are “ok” with any patented/copyrighted/trademarked asset featured in their game?:confused:
But the challenge on the patent has only just been raised. When they put the car in the game, there was no legal problems with the car.
 
Isn’t it PD’s responsibility to make sure they are “ok” with any patented/copyrighted/trademarked asset featured in their game?:confused:

Yes, which is why they removed this car until license is clear.

Unless you are suggesting that a higher authority has impounded the delta wing?
 
I might have missed the discussion but, does anyone know what happened to the Gran Turismo 350Z RS? It's not in NISMO, NISSAN or in Gran Turismo listings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back