dr_slump
Premium
- 7,425
- Switzerland
- the_dr_slump / GTP_dr_slump
I'm speachless if I read things like this:
The controller offers barely any feedback
The controller offers barely any feedback
GT3 metacritic: 95.
GT4 metacritic: 89.
I'm not going to google this - but surely GT4 beat GT3 hands down in the reviews. Far far superior game, massive innovation compared to GT5-->GT6
Hmmm, metacritic - I'll pass on that opinion. GT3 brought fantastic graphics to PS2 but GT4 blew it out the water with it's car list, physics and sheer scale of GT mode. Genuinely stunned that GT3 could be given such a score, must of been compared to its competition at the time in 2001.
I for one dont want to miss that "outdated, stale und not fully functional" gameplay design - its Gran Turismo, and a Gran Turismo has to have that gameplay design! I think they have made great improvements in the presentation of Race events (Goodwood Hillclimb for example) by keeping the same ideology of a Gran Turismo racing career!Maybe now, people will see that the PD/GT is in need of help.
GT6 is what I thought it would be the moment it was announced as a PS3 game; But GT7 on the PS4 alone, won't provide PD with a better game (just more possibilities). PD needs to change and improve their ways of designing gameplay mechanics.
1,200 cars and great (hit and miss) graphics don't make a great game, if the gameplay design is outdated, stale, and/or just not fully functional.
Sony please get these guys some extra hands. It's time to step it up.
75 rating on Metacritic ,btw. Worst scoring GT game of all time.
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/gran-turismo-6/critic-reviews
I don't disagree. But GT5 brought a lot of stuff to the table too, so GT6's claim to fame is that these excellent features are now in a game that's tolerable to play.
Like?But GT5 brought a lot of stuff to the table too
The opinions of GT3 being better than GT4 I will NEVER understand. GT4 was better than GT3 in EVERY way. I was blown away by it when I compared the two.
Like?
Time of day and weather was very limited, course maker was flawed, 3D seriously?, lack of cockpit views would have been a disgrace and they were only for a minority of the cars, so the adding of karts is the only thing i can agree on.Does this really need to be asked? Do you not care about things like time-of-day or dynamic weather? Can't blame you for not caring about damage since it was and still is lackluster, but the seed is there. Cockpit view?? Karting, 3D, Course Maker? None of these sprung to mind before you asked "Like?"??
From what I've heard from others here so far, GT6's physics seems to have vastly improved over GT5. Since I got the game, I'll be checking it out myself. Can't wait!I'll wait for the unbiased people on this board to provide their honest opinion on physics.
Maybe you are just easily satisfiedTime of day and weather were limited, yes, but still excellent additions. And GT6 expands it to even more tracks.
Course Maker wasn't flawed, it was just limited.
3D's still an addition even if you try to downplay it by asking "Seriously?".
Cockpit view is still an addition even if you feel GT5 would've been a disgrace if it didn't have it. Yeah, it's restricted to the small roster of Premiums. Tough titty, we won't be seeing an all-premium car roster until GT7.
I'm speachless if I read things like this:
Maybe you are just easily satisfied
How exaclty does a controller offer feedback?What, the idea that the input method that is used by the vast majority of GT players shouldn't be of any concern?
Wheels are great, and naturally provide better feedback and more control. They're also a fringe accessory, and not an excuse for having a lackluster controller experience.
What, the idea that the input method that is used by the vast majority of GT players shouldn't be of any concern?
Wheels are great, and naturally provide better feedback and more control. They're also a fringe accessory, and not an excuse for having a lackluster controller experience.
How exaclty does a controller offer feedback?
With exception of vibrating while driving over something bumpy.
Maybe it's just me, but I never had a racing game that offered feedback via controller.
There's nothing wrong with GT6's controller experience.
I'm not following yours then, if you agree GT5 was a fail why would you defend it for "having brought a lot of new features to the table" even tough the game was flawed?I'm easily satisfied because I compiled a list of new features in a game that I found intolerable due to its flaws and thus played for less than 10 hours?
I'm afraid I don't follow your logic.
I'm not following yours then, if you agree GT5 was a fail why would you defend it for "having brought a lot of new features to the table" even tough the game was flawed?
OkHow vibration is dealt with to better communicate loss of grip, for one. GT has always had a rather numb controller experience versus other racing games, which is at odds with its very focused wheel experience.
Because the point I was making was that GT6 has all of GT5's awesome new features but improved, and minus most of the flaws that GT5 had.
Because the point I was making was that GT6 has all of GT5's awesome new features but improved, and minus most of the flaws that GT5 had.
So when you lose grip should the controler vibrate more or less?How vibration is dealt with to better communicate loss of grip, for one. GT has always had a rather numb controller experience versus other racing games, which is at odds with its very focused wheel experience.
So GT5.5 than ?
Not really. Have you seen the Laguna Seca comparisons? It's really improved. But really. Why does everyone keep calling GT6 GT5.5? Why does other games get away of being called "new", but not GT?So GT5.5 than ?
Not really. Have you seen the Laguna Seca comparisons? It's really improved. But really. Why does everyone keep calling GT6 GT5.5? Why does other games get away of being called "new", but not GT?
You know what? I don't care what people say. GT6 is a new just like every other game to me.
Because its not a leap forward that deserve to be call the next evolution of GT series. Its basically a GT5 with more cars
In your opinion, it is...Because its not a leap forward that deserve to be call the next evolution of GT series. Its basically a GT5 with more cars
Laguna seca was one of the ugliest tracks in GT5, looking totally PS2 but sharper and from what I've seen so far they have changed the puky textures that were supposed to represent "grass" to grass.Not really. Have you seen the Laguna Seca comparisons? It's really improved. But really. Why does everyone keep calling GT6 GT5.5? Why does other games get away of being called "new", but not GT?