Mr Latte
Premium
- 5,044
- N Ireland
Back again,
To isolate the seat, generally if using additional plates, have these that they are in direct contact with the seat mounts.
The isolation is best suited (underneath) the structure these plates would be attached to. This then decouples the seat from the rig.
Creating a smaller mass for the vibrations to flow through.
Less mass, requires less volume offering a more efficent solution. Requiring the tactile to be driven less hard which can help the tactile feel more composed and better controlled.
The largest LFE is on another level in what it can bring in immersion and felt energy with low frequencies.
Do consider selling these Mini models and amps to have 1 large BK LFE for the seat. This combined with the exciters and well configured effects will blow you away in comparison to what you have experienced so far. Often you will see YTers going on about how strong their tactile is, trust me when I say for certain sensations, that add a game-changer element to the felt experience. We need powerful output capability with the infrasound based frequencies.
As part of my own research, will you send me via DM a link to your old profile you used?
This lets determine what level the effects you have used fits in with the experiences you felt unimpressed with.
EXCITER PLACEMENT
The approach for the seat can be adjusted. Some seats offer the ability to attach a couple of units to the sides adjacent the users thighs. The goal I have for the back of the seat is to have 3x stereo body zones and then to offer the option of having the dual mono units. This allows us to place various effects to key body regions.
I seek for 3 things for the seat
1) wider usable dynamic range available to use in effects creation and development
2) ability to position effects to top / middle / bottom regions of the torso
3) better implement how certain key effects compliment each other
Different seats based on the curvature or other hardware (belt tensioners) may need to vary in the exact positions.
Again the key goal is feeling distinct elements placed to different targetted body zones. For me the shoulders, mid/sides and less effective but still usable is the lower back.
Some prefer to place effects with lower bass, lower to the seat but for me, in my own testing. I see a connection between certain frequencies and the volume used. A more sensaitve area like the top pair at the shoulders can feel different with the same volume using the same effect and frequency, if output on the lowest pair. User preferences will also be a factor.
It is likely from user feedback and in finalising some of the effects, we may see preffered combos in how different effects are mapped to different channels. However I like how this appraoch also lets users determine their own. Another aspect with this approach is that a single effect may have 3x layer elements, we do not need to have these elements be static, to whatever of the 3 pairs are decided. I can build an effect that over its operational range, it can transition its layers to different channels.
This again brings potential in felt sensations not typical with other approaches.
An example of this would be how I may apply road textures and speed, one effect can start in P2 and move to P1 as the cars speed increases. While the other effect can do the opposite, starting in P1 and moving to P2. One is focused on placing more low bass energy at low speed as the other increases its low bass energy at high speeds.
Dont think, you will be disappointed, I have worked too long with tactile to know what a good level of immerson and quality of effects is. Buy a single unit, install it to the top mono position. If you want to be cautious, let me impress you with a single effect I have for inertia sensation. Its felt energy with the combined frequencies/layers it uses will mildly chatter your teeth as the car picks up momentum.
To isolate the seat, generally if using additional plates, have these that they are in direct contact with the seat mounts.
The isolation is best suited (underneath) the structure these plates would be attached to. This then decouples the seat from the rig.
Creating a smaller mass for the vibrations to flow through.
Less mass, requires less volume offering a more efficent solution. Requiring the tactile to be driven less hard which can help the tactile feel more composed and better controlled.
The largest LFE is on another level in what it can bring in immersion and felt energy with low frequencies.
Do consider selling these Mini models and amps to have 1 large BK LFE for the seat. This combined with the exciters and well configured effects will blow you away in comparison to what you have experienced so far. Often you will see YTers going on about how strong their tactile is, trust me when I say for certain sensations, that add a game-changer element to the felt experience. We need powerful output capability with the infrasound based frequencies.
As part of my own research, will you send me via DM a link to your old profile you used?
This lets determine what level the effects you have used fits in with the experiences you felt unimpressed with.
EXCITER PLACEMENT
The approach for the seat can be adjusted. Some seats offer the ability to attach a couple of units to the sides adjacent the users thighs. The goal I have for the back of the seat is to have 3x stereo body zones and then to offer the option of having the dual mono units. This allows us to place various effects to key body regions.
I seek for 3 things for the seat
1) wider usable dynamic range available to use in effects creation and development
2) ability to position effects to top / middle / bottom regions of the torso
3) better implement how certain key effects compliment each other
Different seats based on the curvature or other hardware (belt tensioners) may need to vary in the exact positions.
Again the key goal is feeling distinct elements placed to different targetted body zones. For me the shoulders, mid/sides and less effective but still usable is the lower back.
Some prefer to place effects with lower bass, lower to the seat but for me, in my own testing. I see a connection between certain frequencies and the volume used. A more sensaitve area like the top pair at the shoulders can feel different with the same volume using the same effect and frequency, if output on the lowest pair. User preferences will also be a factor.
It is likely from user feedback and in finalising some of the effects, we may see preffered combos in how different effects are mapped to different channels. However I like how this appraoch also lets users determine their own. Another aspect with this approach is that a single effect may have 3x layer elements, we do not need to have these elements be static, to whatever of the 3 pairs are decided. I can build an effect that over its operational range, it can transition its layers to different channels.
This again brings potential in felt sensations not typical with other approaches.
An example of this would be how I may apply road textures and speed, one effect can start in P2 and move to P1 as the cars speed increases. While the other effect can do the opposite, starting in P1 and moving to P2. One is focused on placing more low bass energy at low speed as the other increases its low bass energy at high speeds.
Dont think, you will be disappointed, I have worked too long with tactile to know what a good level of immerson and quality of effects is. Buy a single unit, install it to the top mono position. If you want to be cautious, let me impress you with a single effect I have for inertia sensation. Its felt energy with the combined frequencies/layers it uses will mildly chatter your teeth as the car picks up momentum.
