CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,268
- United States
Who says I was serious in the first place? I'll make real bets with family and friends, but generally a "bet" online is a joke.
R1600TurboWho says I was serious in the first place? I'll make real bets with family and friends, but generally a "bet" online is a joke.
I agree but even improved a bit.
But please.. nothing like L.A Noire....
R1600TurboWho says I was serious in the first place? I'll make real bets with family and friends, but generally a "bet" online is a joke.
R1600TurboWho says I was serious in the first place? I'll make real bets with family and friends, but generally a "bet" online is a joke.
R1600TurboI'll pay, but I said Summer '12...
So I have until September '12?
Quite. If you don't plan to ante up, don't bet in the first place. There's a German saying that goes "Wettschulden sind Ehrenschulden". It means that an honorable man pays his debts, especially if it was a bet.Pathetic
And both laws are in place for the absolute same reason: To protect kids from things that can't be deemed safe for them to do. Simple as that.And both have completely different effects on the user...
I feel, comparing an M-rated game with an M-rated movie would have been a fairer comparison, that would have made more sense.
More features and more content without the need to go out of your way to specifically develop it.Or... 'why?'.
Being a sport works well enough in real life, as far as purposes go. It does for a variety of other games, as well.Hunting indeed would be a purpose.. (it is for RDR), but can't really see it serving a purpose in GTA though, unless the animals were there to attack you. Then i'd say, fair enough.
So, you think that Rockstar, who've been creating games that are entirely unsutable for children and filled to the brim with content that's entirely unfit for minors, are limiting themselves because hurting animals would be oh so influential on kids?Yes, the PEGI ratings are there for a reason, so us adults can enjoy adult games without the worries about minors playing them.
What i'm saying is: Rockstar know that minors get hold of the game regardless of the strict rating, so therefore Rockstar probably realise (or take into consideration) that there's maybe some content that they shouldn't put in the game.
Those "grey areas" aren't exactly grey areas. They're not even loopholes or anything. They're just people doing what they aren't supposed to. How's that a gray area?I'm not insinuating it would be the fault of the company who rated the movies..
Just stating that whether you choose to believe or not (black & white perspective), that grey area's do infact exist. even if it doesn't within the eyes of the law.
But please.. nothing like L.A Noire....
but generally a "bet" online is a joke.
That's because L.A. Noire was developed by Team Bondi, not Rockstar.SpacegoatOh please god no. The driving physics in L.A Noire were absolute crap, the cars had no feel what so ever. They just sort of floated along.
That's because L.A. Noire was developed by Team Bondi, not Rockstar.
I'll pay, but I said Summer '12...
So I have until September '12?
I think they've had plenty of time to develop this thing, and just because we're only seeing it now doesn't mean they need to work on it for another 2 years. I give it 6-8 months.
Oh ok I thought you were betting on March 2012. Summer 2012 on the other hand is a different story. Not real likely but could maybe happen. March no way.
I will match your $20.00 bet and say it wont come out summer 2012. If you were going with March I would say $50.00
I will take that bet and raise you to $50.00 which will almost cover the price of the game. I have paypal do you? Save this thread and this link and this reply because I am a man of my word and will pay. Will you actually pay when the game does not come out in March 2012? Just for clarification I am betting it wont come out on March 27th for the US correct?
I also heard we will be able to buy houses again like in San Andreas and Vice City. Sounds like they truly listened to the community when building GTA5.
I honestly believe they left many things out of GTA IV so that they wouldn't set the bar too highly for GTA V.
SlashfanThey better make it good or things aren't going to end well lol.
Here's another thing for anyone bitching about graphics. Would you rather have this?
Those graphics were pretty good for back then!
And I still hope in V they will include WEAPON SILENCERS!! A MUST HAVE FOR THE 21st CENTURY.
Oh please god no. The driving physics in L.A Noire were absolute crap, the cars had no feel what so ever. They just sort of floated along.
👍
much worse unless you go for that sort of thing.
That makes sense. It was also their first game on the next gen of consoles. BUT a huge step backward for the series. They removed a LOT of the features that made GTA so fun over all the years. The campaign was barely GTA imo.I honestly believe they left many things out of GTA IV so that they wouldn't set the bar too highly for GTA V.