Hey guys, been following this thread for a good while, but haven't commented until now. I just had a couple of things I wanted to ask/add.
1. Has a decision been made on whether it's going to be a chainsaw-style "total loss" 2 stroke, where the engine oil is mixed with the gas? Or is it going to be a forced induction, sump-style 2 stroke? I ask because that's going to make a big difference in how the car comes out.
Personally, I think a little, sump-style, makes the most sense for this application since total loss engines burn tons of oil and create a lot of pollution which sort of goes against the whole hybrid idea. Something like a 1.0L, 3-cylinder, supercharged, sump-style engine would be great.
Actually! An electric supercharger would work perfectly for what's trying to be done! It wouldn't draw nearly the kind of power from the engine that a normal one would and fits really well with the bleeding edge tech that you guys seem to be going for.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a8965/why-electric-superchargers-make-sense-now/
Edit: One more thing I'd like to add is that it's important to remember that a 2-stroke is going to make a lot more power than a comparably sized 4-stroke. If you have a 1.4L i4 that makes 100 hp, the equivalent 2-stroke is going to be putting out something like 180-200 hp. This is because you have a power stroke every cycle, instead of every other cycle. This means you don't need nearly the same sized engine you would in a normal car to get the desired 300 hp. especially if it's going to have a hybrid system as well.
2. Is the car going to be a road car, or a race car? I ask because if it's going to be a road car I don't think the proposed wing would really work. There would be pretty much no rearward visibility at all, unless you guys want to try and integrate some kind of camera system into the car...which could be cool.