Speak English, please!That would be due to the fact the corvette sells significantly more then the Viper in the first place, its total percent sold would be the low figure, where as the vipers sales are more closer to 100% to it's highest power.
Grand Daddy of the best non aspirated V10 sound in ever.
ZR1 Sales are a drop in the water out of Corvettes total sales, where as the RT isn't in the Vipers sales.Speak English, please!
1992-1995 was only sold as an RT/10. The GTS wasn't available until 1996.ZR1 Sales are a drop in the water out of Corvettes total sales, where as the RT isn't in the Vipers sales.
Click on the number of votes and it will tell you.Out of plain curiosity, who the heck voted "seriously uncool".
Out of plain curiosity, who the heck voted "seriously uncool".
Out of plain curiosity, who the heck voted "seriously uncool".
Thats my point, every corvette sold wasn't a ZR1 so it gives the viper a Higher Low in standard performance across the range.1992-1995 was only sold as an RT/10. The GTS wasn't available until 1996.
a big, loud, brightly coloured car that just screams 'Please pay attention to me! Please! Please?!? LOOK AT ME!'. Nothing is more uncool than someone desperate for attention. It's not impressive, it's just sad. That's one of the reasons why almost all muscle cars and supercars are seriously uncool.
For what it's worth, of the Viper/supercar/high powered sports car owners I've met (most of them I don't really know personally, but a couple I do), none of them care if you're looking at them. As someone wanting to buy one of these car, I don't care either. I'd probably keep it hidden to keep as a measure of safety. The whole "look at me thing" is a stereotype. No doubt there are people that fill it to a t, but that's on the individual driving, not the car.
I wouldn't think the "look at me" people would be driving 20 year old cars anyway.
He explained it perfectly well...^ That moment when you dig your self into a hole you can't explain.
In the eyes of most ordinary people - who are not car enthusiasts - yes. Read the third paragraph again...Your Diesel Focus analogy was exceptionally hilarious.
I should buy a car devoid of enjoyment because there is no point in such a car(Viper) unless I want to show off.
lmao.
What do you mean the RT isn't in the Viper's sales? The RT/10 is the Viper. All the first gen Vipers were RT/10s. And I'm still not sure what you're trying to argue. The ZR1 was a tier of performance in the Corvette model range, while the Viper was a halo car. I get that. But why do you find the halo car cooler than the sleeper that is less brash, cheap, and annoying? You've just [attempted] to repeat the same statement without it having any meaning whatsoever.ZR1 Sales are a drop in the water out of Corvettes total sales, where as the RT isn't in the Vipers sales.
What the 🤬 is a "higher low"?Thats my point, every corvette sold wasn't a ZR1 so it gives the viper a Higher Low in standard performance across the range.
In both quotes you missed the point, well done.What do you mean the RT isn't in the Viper's sales? The RT/10 is the Viper. All the first gen Vipers were RT/10s. And I'm still not sure what you're trying to argue. The ZR1 was a tier of performance in the Corvette model range, while the Viper was a halo car. I get that. But why do you find the halo car cooler than the sleeper that is less brash, cheap, and annoying? You've just [attempted] to repeat the same statement without it having any meaning whatsoever.
What the 🤬 is a "higher low"?
Oh, and this might help us to understand what you're trying so desperately to say: http://www.spellcheck.net/
I missed the point because I cannot understand what you are trying to say. If you want people to understand you, use proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Higher education has nothing to do with it. This is primary school stuff.In both quotes you missed the point, well done.
NExt time comprehension my friend, hopefully your soo called higher education can teach you this.
Out of plain curiosity, who the heck voted "seriously uncool".
I like the GTS a lot. It's probably one of my favourite American cars, but without that cockpit bubble roof line, and with it's 3 spokes on, the RT looses so much of its charm... and leaves only a somewhat (much) less favourable image... a kind of Redneck Douchebag mashup.
I did. Because it is.
If you drive one down the street where I live - and bear in mind one of the biggest American car shows in the country is held a few miles from my house - you'll look completely out of place, in a big, loud, brightly coloured car that just screams 'Please pay attention to me! Please! Please?!? LOOK AT ME!'. Nothing is more uncool than someone desperate for attention.
What do you mean the RT isn't in the Viper's sales?
ZR1 Sales are a drop in the water out of Corvettes total sales, where as the RT isn't [a drop in the water] in the Vipers sales.
(ZR1 is a 1 off that really didn't sell enough to be considered a Normal Corvette).
I get the Viper. I really do. But most people don't, and to them driving something like a Viper marks you out as an attention-seeking pillock before you've even arrived. People will judge you based on first impressions, and if you turn up in a Viper, or a Charger, or a Lamborghini, Caterham, Tonka'd truck, etc., their first impression of you is going to be 'idiot'.** I usually (not always) vote on cool wall cars on what I think the majority of people would think - I can't really say what's cool myself, as I'm not, not that I care - and the Viper isn't.
*With the caveat that, in the real world of the majority of people, all cars - every car ever made, from Fiat 500 to Devel Sixteen - range from meh to uncool, as cars are uncool.
**Just one of the reasons I don't like people much.
Well it depends. Even non car people prefer nice cars to not nice ones. That's why every manufacturer spends a lot of money on styling and building brands.But I feel the perception of the majority (i.e. mostly non-car people)* would be that the driver is only driving such a car to get attention. If that wasn't the aim, they'd all be driving diesel Focuses, surely? After all, a Focus would be more practical, cheaper to run, a more sensible daily driver, and so on.
I get the Viper. I really do. But most people don't, and to them driving something like a Viper marks you out as an attention-seeking pillock before you've even arrived. People will judge you based on first impressions, and if you turn up in a Viper, or a Charger, or a Lamborghini, Caterham, Tonka'd truck, etc., their first impression of you is going to be 'idiot'.** I usually (not always) vote on cool wall cars on what I think the majority of people would think - I can't really say what's cool myself, as I'm not, not that I care - and the Viper isn't.
Actually, they're pretty much the same:The first-gen Viper was a great idea that I'm glad Chrysler had the balls to build. The first generation, however, wasn't perfect. The styling has aged badly. The features are too round, they look bloated. The wheels came directly from a Hotwheels car. Seriously:
The biggest difference there is the Viper had six lugs.
But with a V10 and the status of the closest thing America had to a supercar, it's still cool.
Cool.