Right in the middle of a verbal entanglement with Johnny Penso about 'The State of the Union where the Sun don't shine' in relation to the Gran Turismo player-base at GTP, and where I was trying to persuade him that while his intentions were good, (in another thread,) they were misplaced, I came across this note from him:
. . . which, of course flattered me no end, and gave me impetus to actually earn that title, which I feel is far short of the truth in reality.
So I regard Johnny as someone who enlivens the forum with his thoughts, whether we find
all of them agreeable or not.
And there are many members like that, I guess, but we must remember sometimes to look beyond a single post in judging anybody and regard
all their contributions when we attempt to personalise them with a single epithet.
I missed a few of the News Bulletins recently - and in fact, missed one entirely that mentioned me - to my regret. I never realised that the popularity and success of the
Course Maker Help Desk was also due in part to this:
To my horror I realised that I had not even acknowledged that mention with even a simple 'Thank you' - coming off as uncouth if not downright ignorant - and this is a guy whom I personally flogged in public.
This brings to mind, too, a bunch of people that work really hard ('work'-writing like that would kill me) to bring us tastefully put-together bits of information -
T-12,
Famine,
Slipztream, and
Jordan himself, as well as a few new writers, who give GTPlanet class and place the site firmly in a class of its own when viewing gaming forums. Thank you, guys, and I have learned that it is not wise to miss a single News Bulletin that is posted. Your work here is indispensable.
There are many others I am indebted to in one way or another - and have not mentioned - and some actually who are in my face all the time - from you I ask forgiveness for not reaching out with a love-tap for last year - you are probably the guys so close to me that I take you for granted, the way we do best friends or family.
Big hugs and high-fives to all of you, too.
I did not expected to be mentioned in this thread, but it comes as no surprise to be remembered by someone as friendly as
@photonrider.
By the way photon, by including me in the list of the Opinion Forum's eggheads you've overloaded my ego, and now I fully expect to end
@Famine's 13.7 billion year win streak in the GTP Awards. At least I can dream.
If you can diaper a baby, change a flat, cut up a mango, husk a coconut, play the ukelele, harmonica or spoons in a pinch, swim the breaststroke, play chess, backgammon and poker, do a card trick, do a coin trick, tell the difference between 'fat buddha' and Sanghamitta, handle an outboard motor, bait a line, unhook a catfish without mauling it to death, can tell the difference between Sanskrit and Sinhala, French and German, Spanish and Latin, Chinese and Japanese, can tell what are considered books that are the 'Word of God' from books that are merely treatises on local civility and popular morality, repair an errant water-closet, know what a water closet is, handle a handsaw, broom or vacuum cleaner, ride a bike, drive stick-shift, paint a picture, sing a song, kiss just right, kill and pluck a chicken, start a fire with only your spectacles and some kindling, unload a gun, address a Cardinal properly, grow an indoor plant for a year without murdering it, clean out an aquarium without killing the occupants, bake a cake successfully, handle a smartphone, radiophone or gramophone, know the difference between 'a while' and 'awhile', 'dike and dyke', and 'fared and faired', hang wallpaper, varnish a cabinet, tile a floor, paint a wall, replace a door-lock, fix a kid's bicycle brakes, make a Bloody Mary, tie a knot in a fully-blown balloon, knot a Windsor perfectly, know all the words of 'Happy Birthday', differentiate between Norma Jeane and her thousand look-a-likes, know who Norma Jeane is (or was), take a picture using a Kodak Brownie, can tell a wood-pecker from a tanager, a lake-shore from the sea-shore or burlesque from cabaret, Manet from Monet, Kandinsky from Hofmann or a Merlot from a Chardonnay, Fannings from Silvertips or tulle from brocade, handle a sewing needle, axe, or crowbar, be able to communicate with the hearing-impaired using your fingers, can describe a rainbow to someone born blind . . . or make a newborn baby smile . . . then surely I would have no option but to regard you as knowledgeable as I am.
Though all the above would be just the tip of the iceberg that makes knowledge actually useful.
Wikipedia can take care of everything else.
If Albert Einstein was a member here he would not get the award for 'biggest brain'; he had a smaller brain than average. It was his unusual quota of glial cells that gave him the capacity to make the right connections with the little knowledge he had - and he was known for saying that when he wanted 'knowledge' he would refer an encylopaedia instead of stuffing his head with trivialities. So Intelligence matters a lot more than Knowledge - who amongst us hasn't met a 'knowledgeable' person who has no clue about the common social niceties and comes off as an abrasive personality better avoided?
The guy who flies a Jumbo deliberately into a building has the knowledge of how to fly that plane - but no intelligence as to how to solve the issue of an unbearable life.
As well - I'm sure that the vote (or rather 'nomination') for 'Most knowledgeable' wasn't unanimous - I voted for
Pupik, myself. And that's not to say
Famine, Danoff or yourself weren't knowledgeable - it just meant I didn't read you enough last year - having spent more time with the knowledgeable folk in the gaming forums than in the Rumble Strip.
With that in mind let me add that picking a member with 'gaming' knowledge would be a really hard fight what with having to choose between
Jordan, Famine, T-12, Slipstream . . . and so I decided on Pupik myself this year, because he was succinct most of the time, and most always hit the nail on the head in stimulating the neurons in my nut.
Maybe next year it would be someone else - depending on what part of the site I am inhabiting; I hardly visited the Infield last year, and there were many other sections I didn't visit at all - so my vote was limited to whatever I picked up on in the Rumble Strip - the awards seemingly reflecting mostly those who frequent the Infield and Rumble Strip. If there were nominations first and awards later - then surely you would be nominated. 👍
And even awarded.
The awards themselves are merely playful - not to be taken too seriously - after all even the concepts of 'nomination' and 'award' are mixed up quite hilariously.
To be sure
DQuaN does a great and unprejudiced job of waking up the Community to how people are perceived - and as time goes on I'm hoping that the whole 'Awards' schtick will actually be run efficiently, grandly, and knowledgeably enough for everyone everywhere on this site to take the votes seriously. For now it's just a bit of End-of-Year fun.
Just like this thread.
And with that, I'm going to forward a request to the Admins to lock this 2015 Member Appreciation room.
We get to do it all over again next year, right?
Harry.