It's just to provide a more consistent aesthetic. The square-edged images looked awkward next to the new rounded post container in my testing. I also find even some of the...uglier avatars look a bit more stylish with the added corner radius.I there a specific reason for the rounding on the avatars? I personally preferred them square then people have choice to the make them rounded if they want.
Yeah, the rounding is done with CSS3, which older browsers don't support. In that case, everything will be squared off.I can't see the avatars being rounded here on IE7 either by the way, Jordan.
Still, it doesn't solve it on say a 4 page thread.
For example I might want to resume the F1 thread from yesterday at page 2 or 3, now I can't and have to load up 1 or the last page through this new icon. Sometimes I remember a page thats three pages from the last and want to go back there the next day by clicking on the number but can't now and have to click the last page icon or load the first page.
I would like an option to have page links at the end of the thread like they were before please.
I also find even some of the...uglier avatars look a bit more stylish
It's just to provide a more consistent aesthetic. The square-edged images looked awkward next to the new rounded post container in my testing. I also find even some of the...uglier avatars look a bit more stylish with the added corner radius.
JondotAlso I formally request this flag:
I do change the site's look roughly once per year, but the timing is always different. You can see how the design has evolved over the years here.This is really cool does this mean every year this day we will have a new layout?
No, of course not - your avatar is classy, in my opinion. I was just playfully referring to some of the troll face / rage comic avatars.Like mine?
It's for consistency and usability/readability. As I mentioned in the announcement, shorter line measures are generally considered much easier to read - that's why newspapers, magazines, and books often have narrow columns of text, and that's why most websites today employ a fixed-width layout as you see here.As modern LCD displays are getting wider and wider I'm somewhat puzzled at the choice to limit the site width to 980 pixels for the sake of consistency. Even square 1280x1024 displays are inefficiently used with this layout.
No, of course not - your avatar is classy, in my opinion. I was just playfully referring to some of the troll face / rage comic avatars.
Argh change, I hate change.
Hopefully it'll grow on me, fixed width is definitely driving me crazy now, with all those wasted empty space.
I don't think 'Gay Pride' can be classed as a country!
Haha, well better for you to get used to it since we might have changes every year.
If you don't like the fixed width, you can change back to the wider (full width) in your options, in there choose the 'Wide' option and you're done
That would be nice (I've wanted to create a 'dark' theme for years), but it's ultimately not practical. In addition from the up-front development and testing required, another skin/theme would effectively double my maintenance workload.I love it. I never have any of the adaptability problems some have voiced here, even with the pre-update changes I just adapted instantly.
I do wish there was an alternate, almost mirrored version of GTP where everything was...different, yet almost the same. What say you, Jordan?
What happened to the page count after threads? I understand it cleans things up a bit but now more clicky when I want to go to the 2nd to last page, etc.
Also, where did the search bar go?? There used to be one on the upper right area of any given page.