I pretty much completely agree with the article. Polyphony dropped the ball in so many ways with GT5.... and no, I'm not a Forza Fan. I've been playing GT since the first one.
Nice to see the GT defence brigade in full force.
Rather than just saying it's "rubbish" why don't you lot try and counter some of his points?
+1 Really guys we have got to look at this article with a non-biased opinion. It does speak some truth. If Forza 4 has great graphics, physics and A.I. it will be better than GT5. IMO PD has let us down on this one - not because GT5 is a bad game, just because they promised stuff that they did not deliver.
I'm going to stick my neck out here and say the writer of the article makes valid points that most of which have yet to be addressed and sorted out by PD, Yes I am a SONY faithful these days have been for nearly 10 years now but, PD have made a massive boob by not taking into consideration what the fans want, As an example here before anyone bites my head off and I could be wrong on this, But I am pretty sure Media Molecule release more DLC/Patches than PD in any equivalent time frame because they care about the product and the fan base.
SkateNjYou do know 90 percent of DLC in games is actually on the disk and your paying to unlock it? Thats not caring thats just greediness
That's nice. I just wasted a few minutes of my life reading that. Thanks.
That made me throw up a little in my mouth.
And that's why I trust Gamespot over IGN.
It's true PD is the worst gaming company EVER, they treat their fans like ****
You do know 90 percent of DLC in games is actually on the disk and your paying to unlock it? Thats not caring thats just greediness
doctorrgI have to say, I don't get this whole DLC thing either. Why would I want new content I actually have to pay for? I just want new content, which should have been part of the game in the first place. So far, I've refused to pay for any DLC, unless I don't have the game yet and it doesn't actually cost all that much extra to add the DLC on initial purchase.
That probably has more to do with the fact that only GT game ever released during the time span of Forza 1 to Forza 4 is GT5, & even that was technically still in development before Forza 1. PD may not have shown any sort of annoyance with T10, but they certainly haven't responded back with a well-rounded game, either. As the article said, PD doesn't work smart in terms of deadlines.Forza has been around for more than 6 years now? And PD have shown no annoyance with them, nor any lack of confidence ever since Turn 10 shown up.
And with that statement goes any sort of credibility your posts will ever have regarding the 2 games.I don't think Forza 4, a game on the 360, is gonna topple a game on the PS3.
Maybe 2011 cars or even 2012?
Not sure I fully disagree with you but in this genre DLC is ok with me dependent on content of course.
Also to busy turning cheeseheads who don't know how to drive into a real pro driver..driving in this game and driving in real life are nothing alike give us some more tracks and cars you bums
He's right for the most part. A few guys getting into the competition & doing well afterwards (who more than likely already had a hidden talent for driving) don't make up for the chunk of GT players.Lucas Ordonez would like to have a word with you.
He's right for the most part. A few guys getting into the competition & doing well afterwards (who more than likely already had a hidden talent for driving) don't make up for the chunk of GT players.
SopranoStylleGt too busy making 23 of the same cars rather than introducing new dlc. Let's by 23 miatas, 26 3000gt or gto, 29 s2000 way to many of the same cars in this game it's kind of sickening buying them from the ucd when there all the same crap big fail on gt