Do any of you guy's schools have observers that evaluate teachers? My county has a strange evaluation of teachers, to the point of becoming irrelevant of displaying true teaching abilities. My history teacher ranted quite seriously about the issues with the system, stating that because observers acknowledge themselves of conducting evaluations on one week but at a random time, teachers can exploit this by doing things otherwise abnormal of their usual teaching methods just to raise their scores (e.g. writing Objectives on the board - it cannot be more trivial than that). These observers don't even account for student attitudes, behaviors, or the atmosphere that exists without a total stranger hopelessly sneaking in the room. Of course their evaluations do include the more objective-based factors like recent test scores. But the more subjective-based factors like student attentiveness is entirely up to the observer and their skill of identifying the littlest educative weakness of the teacher. My English teacher actually released a bit of results to us, and it was pretty shocking how it came out. She also put up a math formula the evaluators actually uses that tried to measure "teacher effectiveness", but only a few of us cracked its variables since the math involved was a bit too complicated to decipher. Plus, there was no given guidelines on using the formula in fears of external exploitation. She, and a number of other teachers, raised a bit opinion on this, but I prefer not to say a lot on that.
Now my high school plans to dedicate their next newspaper headline (yes, we have a newspaper committee) on the entire system, which will be very interesting to read.