CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,348
- United States
Lol ass!! Personally I don't even consider them a proper racing car. But that's just me.
It has four wheels and is driven on a race track.
Sounds like a race car to me.
Lol ass!! Personally I don't even consider them a proper racing car. But that's just me.
Here we have the popular "I'm an old school NASCAR fan. Modern NASCAR sucks!" You also have the same thing with Formula 1 "fans"
It has four wheels and is driven on a race track.
Sounds like a race car to me.![]()
Oh yeah!Truth is these people never were anything close to big NASCAR fans. If they were, they would at least know stock cars have always been heavy and slow
Whether you like NASCAR or not, it will have the fullest grids, most consistent grids, and best competition in the online races.
The cars are the ultimate interpretation of the regulations.Here are some match ups I'm going to do once the game comes out and of course my predictions:
(This will be unrestricted and on Talledega and Daytona):
NASCAR vs F1: F1
NASCAR vs Le Mans Proto: Proto.
NASCAR vs GT1 & GT2: NASCAR
NASCAR vs Super GT: NASCAR
NASCAR vs WRC: NASCAR
👍
Once again, I hope my prediction is right because it would suck to know that a car that was built around oval racing actually loses on its home turf. :/
For me personally NASCAR is a bad inclusion in the game, their isn't much skill required to drive around in circles and it's going to get extremely boring.
The problem is, SuperGTs aren't build for high end speeds & have a tendency to run out of steam when they get up over 170Mph b/c they just never run on courses allowing them to do so. Stock cars however, are built primarily for speeds over 170Mph, and can keep running to 210Mph on certain tracks.To bring my post back to OP's topic a GT500 super gt car would destroy a nascar restricted to 450hp, obviously, but if you put an 800hp dinosaur vs a 500hp super gt car then you will have a slightly closer race (still think the super gt car would win due to incredible aerodynamics and weight/power ratio)
Actually the NASCAR cars are heavier or about the same. They weigh 3450lbs.I fell that NASCAR would beat a lot of today’s Super Cars because they weigh about 1000lbs or lighter and their full tube car with 800 horse power and gearing to get them at top speed.
While I agree with you on the gearing and such, the lightest COT is still 3,100lbs., which is actually around 200-300lbs. heavier than quite a few supercars.I fell that NASCAR would beat a lot of today’s Super Cars because they weigh about 1000lbs or lighter and their full tube car with 800 horse power and gearing to get them at top speed.
Eh, if thats all of your oval racing "experience" then please stop here.
At least try a proper sim (nothing against your opinion but dont try to prove a point which doesnt exsist).
How many NASCAR races have you watched? Do you even get them on TV? Do you know any of the rules? Any of the drivers? Do you know any of the tracks besides Daytona?
True, I don't know you, but you're just another statistic to me. Your type is very common, easy to spot.
So your hate of NASCAR and oval racing is based on this
As expected you little to nothing about NASCAR or oval racing in general, yet you felt the need to come in this thread and mouth off about how boring it is.
If you want to know what oval racing is about pick yourself up a copy of this game
Go online to one of the openspeedway.net servers and get your head handed to you on a platter, that is if you don't get ejected first because you can't keep the car pointed straight or can't handle the 3 wide bumper to bumper racing with cars on the razor edge[
There also such a thing as educated and uneducated opinions.
I dont know why I get sucked into replying to posts like this and others, it's a waste of my time because the truth is they don't care.
Here we have the popular "I'm an old school NASCAR fan. Modern NASCAR sucks!" You also have the same thing with Formula 1 "fans"
Truth is these people never were anything close to big NASCAR fans. If they were, they would at least know stock cars have always been heavy and slow
I will say this to you, and any other NASCAR basher:
Unless you actually go to and watch a LIVE race, you will never understand the sport.👎
You guys think that because you like the sport that you need to force others to like the sport.
No. We try to make sure that people are informed before they criticize, and they usually aren't.
So you quoted my post but you didnt aim the post at me. Thats a new one to me. I am trying to be nice about this but as usual someone has to have a go at me on this forumDid I say "you"? No, I didn't so don't try to make it as if I'm not understanding your point. I made a direct response to part of your statement, so don't try to shift the context.
For me personally NASCAR is a bad inclusion in the game, their isn't much skill required to drive around in circles and it's going to get extremely boring.
Wether im watching the car going in circles or driving the car in circles. Its still the most boring motorsport I know of. But thats just me.
You have a valid point. Though it does sound like fun I'm hoping that we arent forced to play Nascar in the main game , but if we do I dont mind too much. I just have no interest in the sport and I wish some people would just accept that.Did you ever play one of those Nascar games? I played and really enjoyed it, sure round and round but with other drivers trying to get around or tailing you it really was fun. I agree some nascar races are a bit boring to watch, I would rather drive. Its pretty much like watching Golf to me, boring to watch at times but very fun to play, keep an open mind. As they say dont knock it till you try it. Remember we have one of the best teams out there making this game, its not going to be a EA second effort ya know?
These kinds of comments are kind of putting me off posting in this site lately. You guys think that because you like the sport that you need to force others to like the sport. Also if anybody says anything against Gran Turismo then they are flamed to hell. I shoud be allowed to my own opinion and not like the sport. Can you just please leave it that.
I think you just need to take a step back, he was replying to you but he wasn't calling you uniformed or trying to insult you in any way. You've just missunderstood him that's all. You implied that he and others were trying to force others to like the sport, his reply was just saying that he wasn't trying to force people to like the sport, he was just trying to make people more informed on the sport. Nothing wrong or offensive in that.It would help if you did'nt quote a post from another person and reply to that post , then say it wasnt aimed at them. Maybe its you who needs more reading comprehension. If your not intentionaly replying to a person then dont intentionaly quote their post with an answer. Any person would have picked up your post as it being aimed at them if you quoted them and had an answer to it.
Next time if you want to reply and not aim your post at another person do'nt quote another persons post with your post. That is how an indirect post works.
Im just wondering how many peopl on here arent rude and dont go on the attack over small stuff.
I was'nt criticising. I was stating my opinion that I think the sport is boring. That is my opinion and not criticising the sport. I thought that I had a right to my opinion.