- 8,480
- P_Balance
Unfortunately, you are dead wrong. I have ridden in a 1000hp supra, and it was quite exhilarating, but...each person has their own preference, can we agree?
Physics though, to say the least.
Unfortunately, you are dead wrong. I have ridden in a 1000hp supra, and it was quite exhilarating, but...each person has their own preference, can we agree?
Unfortunately, you are dead wrong. I have ridden in a 1000hp supra, and it was quite exhilarating, but...each person has their own preference, can we agree?
Whoring out Dougboy's car.
![]()
Yeah, I'd like to see close ups of the fitment. The wheels look good with a nice little dish. The front tires look more stretched than the rear, what's the deal with that? The rear tire size would look better on the front in my opinion (I think the mild rear stretch looks great) and that's why the fronts look small. If he's going to stretch the front tires like that he needs spacers and more lows.Perhaps a small spacer would be in order.
What's up with you being such a douche? I don't get this..
Stagger on a fwd car is also bad looking.
Reverse stagger is fine for FWD cars.I thought about running a staggered setup on the Civic for track days. The whole smaller wheels in back thing. Wasn't sure it was worth it though.
Honestly I don't mind as long as the person doesn't act like they've still got some kind of awesome handling race car or something after doing stuff like that. (or that a fully automatic slushbox can still be considered an effective means of performance driving. Makes me wonder how much understanding they have of what is involved with actually driving a car quickly) I was just saying I don't really like how staggered setup's look on fwd cars.Last but not least, im going to be honest and say im a poser. Performance is not my main concern, as opposed to fitment/drivability
Reverse stagger is fine for FWD cars.
I imagine it would help a good bit at autocrosses or tight tracks, but I think for a faster track, a setup with more overall grip (not staggered) would be more drivable at high speeds.
If you don't really care for your fenders, I'd go with a 215/45/15 up front and a 205/50/15 in the rear. Maybe a small sway bar like one from an SI to help it rotate. Just don't go overboard so the car is unstable doing anything except tight corners.Recommended setup? Our track here is actually a large go-kart track about a mile long, so I may just do this.
If you don't really care for your fenders, I'd go with a 215/45/15 up front and a 205/50/15 in the rear. Maybe a small sway bar like one from an SI to help it rotate. Just don't go overboard so the car is unstable doing anything except tight corners.
I was just saying I don't really like how staggered setup's look on fwd cars.
I know, but whether the car is FWD or RWD is what makes me like it or not. Kind of like a hood scoop. I don't really like them, but in the case of a Subaru STI for instance, I know it's functional, and therefore, I think it belongs there, and looks weird without it.Staggered wheels look the same regardless of where the car puts the power down.
You're not a poser if you're not posing.As for the stagger, no it doenst make sense. I decided against staggered wheels but the front rubbed wayyy too much so i had to put in a narrower tire to make room. Plus, the car is parked on a slant in that pic. Its weight is leaning on the other side so the gap appears to be bigger.
Last but not least, im going to be honest and say im a poser. Performance is not my main concern, as opposed to fitment/drivability
that is epic.