- 803
- Amsterdam
- HennyGingerale
If assault is already illegal, how would we lower the amount of assaults by making Islam illegal?Criminal assaults woman, remains at large through lack of witnesses. Better ban Islam.
If assault is already illegal, how would we lower the amount of assaults by making Islam illegal?Criminal assaults woman, remains at large through lack of witnesses. Better ban Islam.
The UK is not a secular country, we have a state religion, the head of which is the monarch, with leaders of that faith embedded automatically in the House of Lords.But I don't live in these states, I live in London. We are a secular country with the religious majority being Christians.
I didn't, I compared three religions, mainly to point our a weird double standard you have repeatedly employed.Why do these debates always, always, always turn into Christianity? It's bizarre. It's like talking about multiple sclerosis and then saying "well what about brain tumours?". Why can't we discuss the topic at hand?
....And with that I can walk around safely with a "Jesus is queer" top. Remember that even though we have what you have stated, in general terms the UK is one of the more secular countries in the world.The UK is not a secular country, we have a state religion, the head of which is the monarch, with leaders of that faith embedded automatically in the House of Lords.
No double standard. I'm pointing out the flaw in the ideology that "all religions are equal". It's like saying "you can be anything you want to be". Patently false and ridiculous.I didn't, I compared three religions, mainly to point our a weird double standard you have repeatedly employed.
Oh and posting the Free Speech Union, an organisation that only likes free speech when it agrees with them, rather telling.
You can see it's a liddle bit MAGA-like.And citing the Middle East Forum as well, a conservative think tank set up to promote US interests, with close ties to Israel? Did the absolutist nature of that piece not give you the slightest pause for thought?
"That doesn't count."The UK is not a secular country, we have a state religion, the head of which is the monarch, with leaders of that faith embedded automatically in the House of Lords.
If you need to effectively redefine what a secular nation is to describe the UK, then it's not.....And with that I can walk around safely with a "Jesus is queer" top. Remember that even though we have what you have stated, in general terms the UK is one of the more secular countries in the world.
No ones said they are all equal, so drop the strawman, you know the exact point that's being raised, which is your repeated double standards.No double standard. I'm pointing out the flaw in the ideology that "all religions are equal". It's like saying "you can be anything you want to be". Patently false and ridiculous.
Toby Young, the MEF and FSU are all quite MAGA-like, well spotted.You can see it's a liddle bit MAGA-like.
That was the entire point of my previous post. Forgot the /s tag, sorry.If assault is already illegal, how would we lower the amount of assaults by making Islam illegal?
Yeah sorry i should address it to @HenrySwansonThat was the entire point of my previous post. Forgot the /s tag, sorry.
You don't see how that's worse? In a Christian nation I'm more safe to do that...?If you need to effectively redefine what a secular nation is to describe the UK, then it's not.
What is the point then?No ones said they are all equal, so drop the strawman, you know the exact point that's being raised, which is your repeated double standards.
I'm saying you guys are. For Christ's sake, the Toby Young article is a free version of The Times article because it was paywalled!!Toby Young, the MEF and FSU are all quite MAGA-like, well spotted.
I was addressing a singular point, your claim that the UK is a secular nation. It's not, and your moving goal posts.You don't see how that's worse? In a Christian nation I'm more safe to do that...?
I've no idea, you claimed people were saying they were all equal, not me.What is the point then?
Which has zero to do withe the issue of using a eugenics supporting, misogynistic, homophobe, who set up a 'Free speech ' organisation with zero interest in actual free speech as a source.I'm saying you guys are. For Christ's sake, the Toby Young article is a free version of The Times article because it was paywalled!!
This is insanity!