Just like we know Tay-Sachs disease is a problem in certain Jewish communities:
en.wikipedia.org
Cool. I haven't seen you advocating for banning Jews from intermarrying though, so I'm going to take this as more evidence that the "health benefits" are not even slightly the point of what you're trying to do. They're an excuse that falls apart under the slightest scrutiny.
You could be advocating for genetic testing for children born of unions that are within a certain level of familial closeness (as it what happens for many Ashkenazi couples), but you're not. Because you don't care about health, you care about breaking up communities that you see as "threatening" and forcing them to become like you.
I'm surprised you're not going all the way and advocating for arranged marriages for these migrants with suitable partners chosen for them by the state. In the name of integration, of course. If you want an integrated society, surely it's for the best that you make it happen as quickly and efficiently as possible. No?
You know, there was once a set of policies in Australia that I think you'd really like. It's colloquially referred to as the Stolen Generations, and the policies in place during that period really hit on a lot of the concerns that you have. Some might say that it showed that trying to separate people from their culture and history in order to make them more "white" was at best foolish. But you're a strong, independent thinker with a demonstrated ability to reason clearly, so I have no doubt that you'll understand how effective those policies were.
Were they allowed to show Muhammad?
Was the ending speech allowed to be broadcast?
Are those episodes available now?
View attachment 1398368
Like I said, you guys are a bit like the dinosaurs of the internet, which is depressing to see.
The point you made was that no one ever criticises Islam to a degree that you find suitable. Despite whatever restrictions and/or threats they may or may not have faced, the show was unquestionably critical of Islam. It continues to be so, regardless of how easy it is to access.
Arguably, the point that the show was trying to make is made substantially stronger by the meta-narrative of what went on around it. Which to my understanding was mostly about the network having concern around physical safety because there were people directly threatening violence, rather than any greater systemic policy of soft-balling Islamic criticism.
I think you can't distinguish between when you're arguing for religious critique and when you're arguing for ignoring threats of violence from extremists. It's all just one big muddled mess to you, which doesn't really give much of a sense that you've got a strong and well reasoned opinion on the matter.
You're just throwing it all at the wall to see what sticks in order to support an "opinion" which you made your mind up on long, long before anything resembling facts entered the picture.
Guys, I'm gently trying to wake you up to what's happening in the Western World outside of here.
Stuff is happening to the Western World, just not what you think it is.
Do you want to warn us all about the Great Replacement too, just to round things out? Tell us all about how much better things were when the UK was a dominant colonial power and all the darkies knew to keep their heads down, do as they were told and be thankful for the privilege of existing?
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
