This was liked in 2010 but I only saw it now.
Lot of deaths did lead to that one kill, actually + years of time, billions of dollars & unimaginable amount of manpower. I absolutely get the point, but I think this is comparing apples to oranges.Silly uniformed people who eats CNN for all meals. Again America didnt suddenly bomb Osamas neighborhood and kill all of them while hunting for one.
Well, at least those death were mostly the ones who are affiliated and the civilian deaths were unexpected and avoided. Israel has the biggest military budget and also backed by US. So its inexcusable and also hypocritical for Israel to do like now TBH.Lot of deaths did lead to that one kill, actually + years of time, billions of dollars & unimaginable amount of manpower. I absolutely get the point, but I think this is comparing apples to oranges.
the civilian deaths were unexpected
...and avoided...
I think this is comparing apples to oranges.
Yes. But still sounds less horrifying than deliberately attack all people like no other.No, because they happened.
Maybe sounds scary to you, but there were plenty of civilian casualties as U.S. Forces hunted for Bin Laden. Due diligence by the soldiers before they shot at the victims were often called into question by the media & protested by the locals.Yes. But still sounds less horrifying than deliberately attack all people like no other.
Jewish people were persecuted by the Nazis and right after that they did something, if not worse, at least as bad.
Apparently. It's even sadder when people claim the Holocaust never happened but yet have no issue saying the Jews are Nazis.Wait, what? You're telling me the Jews did something as bad as, maybe worse, than rounding up, imprisoning and systematically exterminating six million Palestinians?
Wait, what? You're telling me the Jews did something as bad as, maybe worse, than rounding up, imprisoning and systematically exterminating six million Palestinians?
Like I was said, What Israel did now is like a rape victim can get a pass to rape all because it is a victim.Wait, what? You're telling me the Jews did something as bad as, maybe worse, than rounding up, imprisoning and systematically exterminating six million Palestinians?
You're right. It was a stupid statement.
The main ponit of the post was the video though. Have you seen it?
@GTracer98 I didn't say that.
Israel isn't exactly "getting a pass" here, considering the condemnation of them this time around.Like I was said, What Israel did now is like a rape victim can get a pass to rape all because it is a victim.
They are having a pass.Israel isn't exactly "getting a pass" here, considering the condemnation of them this time around.
Western countries should stand by the palestinian people. How? I'm not sure. But doing nothing and saying that Israel has the right to self-defense is BS.
Ceding lands to them doesn't qualify as recognizing?How about Israel recognizing a Palestinian state too?
Ceding lands to them doesn't qualify as recognizing?
To the Palestinians. Maybe I am confused on this part.To them?
To the Palestinians. Maybe I am confused on this part.
The IndependentThe booklet is full of meaty advice about how they should shape their answers for different audiences. For example, the study says that "Americans agree that Israel 'has a right to defensible borders'. But it does you no good to define exactly what those borders should be. Avoid talking about borders in terms of pre- or post-1967, because it only serves to remind Americans of Israel's military history. Particularly on the left this does you harm. For instance, support for Israel's right to defensible borders drops from a heady 89 per cent to under 60 per cent when you talk about it in terms of 1967."
I always love those maps. Especially how they always purposely label how much "Palestinian Land" there was before the partition plan, and note how much was "lost" because of it.Very clear