- 2,938
- Shrewsbury
- pezzarinho17
Very occasionally, I get E-Mail notifications so I know when he has updated it. Again, always very genuine and never one to shy away from saying what he wants.
Formula 1 cars have significantly more power and downforce - so much so that having open regulations in Formula 3 will offer little benefit to junior drivers. Especially when they have to go through the intermediary step of Formula 2. The only real benefit is that it encourages engine suppliers to get involved in the junior levels, which makes them more likely to run a driver development programme.I think it's important that Open reg junior formula exist for the future so to make the F1 leap not soo different
Not all drivers have to go through formula 2, but the point I'm making is if you have manufactures in your series and possible factory teams it helps you build relationships for further on.Formula 1 cars have significantly more power and downforce - so much so that having open regulations in Formula 3 will offer little benefit to junior drivers. Especially when they have to go through the intermediary step of Formula 2. The only real benefit is that it encourages engine suppliers to get involved in the junior levels, which makes them more likely to run a driver development programme.
I imagine that if the FIA wants to streamline the third tier, they will revise the regulations. They did for Formula 2 - the GP2/11 chassis and Mechachrome engine will be replaced next year.F3 could surely go down that path and has for years.
Are you talking about the Markelov who controlled the race from lights to flag, or a different Markelov?So a normal Markelov move then...
Sprint race was better. Some brilliant moves by Leclerc, Markelov, Canamasas and De Vries. I'm not sure what Rowland was thinking at the end there. He's under investigation for it.The F2's were a bit of a dud
I'm not sure what actually happened at the end there, the commentators weren't very clear about the incident. What did Rowland do?Sprint race was better. Some brilliant moves by Leclerc, Markelov, Canamasas and De Vries. I'm not sure what Rowland was thinking at the end there. He's under investigation for it.
He backed everyone up at the restart. Latifi was in the lead, so he had DAMS tell him to go early while he backed everyone up as much as possible before the restart line. He was staring down a five-second penalty for earlier contact with King or Markelov (I missed who it was for) and was trying to take everyone by surprise. Leclerc was really the only driver he was trying to finish ahead of, so I can only imagine that he was hoping Leclerc would get swamped or that everyone would trip over each other - but deliberately trying to force a messy restart seems ridiculously irresponsible.I'm not sure what actually happened at the end there, the commentators weren't very clear about the incident. What did Rowland do?
I think they're also investigating the Gelael spin. Was Rowland given his 5 second penalty for pushing King or Markelov off at the start?Sprint race was better. Some brilliant moves by Leclerc, Markelov, Canamasas and De Vries. I'm not sure what Rowland was thinking at the end there. He's under investigation for it.
Thanks.He backed everyone up at the restart. Latifi was in the lead, so he had DAMS tell him to go early while he backed everyone up as much as possible before the restart line. He was staring down a five-second penalty for earlier contact with King or Markelov (I missed who it was for) and was trying to take everyone by surprise. Leclerc was really the only driver he was trying to finish ahead of, so I can only imagine that he was hoping Leclerc would get swamped or that everyone would trip over each other - but deliberately trying to force a messy restart seems ridiculously irresponsible.
I didn't see that.I think they're also investigating the Gelael spin.
I don't know - I missed the start and only caught replays of both. I'm guessing it was the contact with King since it put King out of the race, but the move on Markelov was questionable. Markelov had the speed to pass him if Rowland hadn't put him on the grass. As we saw from Boschung's spin, getting out on the grass is dangerous, and Markelov was much further alongside Rowland than Boschung was alongside the other car.Was Rowland given his 5 second penalty for pushing King or Markelov off at the start?
In that case, it was very well-deserved. It was a similar move at Hockenheim last year that soured me on Rowland. Good to see this kind of nonsense isn't tolerated.Rowland's penalty was for not leaving Markelov any room down when he went for a pass down the inside of the Wellington Straight.
Rowland was given a 20 second post-race penalty, according to Autosport, but there's no mention of what the penalty was actually for.Did Rowland get penalised for the restart? I assume he did - Wikipedia had him down as finishing tenth, but now he's seventeenth. If so, what did he get penalised for? At the time, the commentators pointed out that the rule about falling too far behind the safety car only applies when the lights are on.
Did Rowland get penalised for the restart? I assume he did - Wikipedia had him down as finishing tenth, but now he's seventeenth. If so, what did he get penalised for? At the time, the commentators pointed out that the rule about falling too far behind the safety car only applies when the lights are on.
Impeding other drivers under the safety car.Rowland was given a 20 second post-race penalty, according to Autosport, but there's no mention of what the penalty was actually for.
Seems like a bit of a reach to me. He should have been penalised for it because it was bordering on dangerous driving - he seemed to think he could trip everyone up - but I'm guessing that there wasn't a specific penalty for it so impeding others was the best thet could do.Impeding other drivers under the safety car.