Both have been tried. And will be tried again. There's also the courthouse in Mongomery, Alabama which displays the ten commandments in a conspicuous place.Originally posted by DGB454
Prayer is allowed and not mandated and that was only after a battle to force the schools to allow it.(freedom of religion)
I don't know of any schools that have been mandated to teach creationism.
We are telling you how to live but you can't think of how?
No no - gays and evolutionists are behind all street violence incidents.Originally posted by milefile
Street violence is also not really at issue. Nobody disputes that street violence is wrong and criminal. The fact that Christian morality and laws against street violence is inconsequntial. All morality is against street violence. People who do not pray are against street violence, Gays are, too. Evolutionists, as far as I know, are on the whole, opposed to street violence as well.
The legislated morality in question here is all laws governing interaction between consenting adults.
Now you're being silly; I hope at least it's on purpose.Originally posted by DGB454
Just because the 10 Commandments are displayed doesn't mean you have to follow them or that they are laws.
As Christians aptly illustrate.Originally posted by DGB454
It's easy to cry about something and point fingers but much harder to do something to change it.
Probably. When a judge puts up the ten commandments, god's law, one would safely assume he uses that as the standard in his decisions, which is unacceptable because there are perfectly legal acts covered by the ten commandments, i.e. covetousness, adultery.Originally posted by DGB454
You are being silly. The question here is Legislatived morality.(forcing someone to be moral by using the law)
Is he making anyone follow the commandments?
Originally posted by DGB454
I didn't say any one group was behind them.
Why are you suprised? Am I wrong?
I'm not being any sillier than you are. My judge would not be making anyone support Communism, either... but everyone to the right of Ralph Nader would be crying for his head on a pike. You know as well as I do that hanging a plaque of Christian law in a United States courtroom that is Constitutionally required to be completely secular is to inject a bias where it has no place. Justice is supposed to be blind, correct?Originally posted by DGB454
You are being silly. The question here is Legislatived morality.(forcing someone to be moral by using the law)
Is he making anyone follow the commandments?
Originally posted by DGB454
So he is forcing people to obey them?
Perhaps he does use those standards in his decisions but is it any different than any a judge using whatever his standards happen to be when judging someone? It is also possible that a Judge can tell the difference between statutes the commandments and judge fairly. I don't know the man and I am in no position to judge how he thinks or what he bases his decissions on.
It's never safe to assume anything.
If it was publically displayed it would not be okay. It would be like putting a gay pride flag up. They are equally inappropriate and irrelevant in a court of law. Have you ever seen a statue of Justice? She is blindfolded.Originally posted by DGB454
He isn't forcing anyone to obey them. What if he kept them on his desk or sitting by his gavel instead? In plain view of everyone. Would that be ok or would that still be a bad thing?