- 24,612
- Anoka, MN
Not even in 2009 for 17 races? And wasn't Petty/Andretti Motorsports for the subsequent two seasons a continuation of that enterprise?
Andretti was with Front Row in 2009.
Not even in 2009 for 17 races? And wasn't Petty/Andretti Motorsports for the subsequent two seasons a continuation of that enterprise?
Andretti was with Front Row in 2009.
Hmm, he definitely raced for RPM in the 2009 Indy 500 and my record book shows him in that team for the full season. As you were
2009 Indy 500 was a partnership with Dreyer/Reinbold and Petty, '10-'11 were Petty/Andretti Autosport for Indy and '10 Kansas.Hmm, he definitely raced for RPM in the 2009 Indy 500 and my record book shows him in that team for the full season. As you were
I'm afraid to tell you your record book is wrong.
Craig Lowndes, too. He did a season of F3000 in 1997, racing for Helmut Marko with Juan Pablo Montoya as his team mate, but finished seventeenth overall with a single points-scoring finish - a fourth place at Pergusa - to his name.Marcos Ambrose
Craig Lowndes, too. He did a season of F3000 in 1997, racing for Helmut Marko with Juan Pablo Montoya as his team mate, but finished seventeenth overall with a single points-scoring finish - a fourth place at Pergusa - to his name.
If his two outings in 2009 are anything to judge by...Luca Badoer? I don't think he could have been a clnsistent race winner or champion, but the fact that he is most well known for having started the most races without scoring a point seems wrong for a former F3000 champion.
They're not, he was a decent driver who measured up decently against teammates when called upon. His 2 race spell in the worst car Ferrari have made in an era should not blight that, seeing as Fisichella also did nothing good with that car.If his two outings in 2009 are anything to judge by...
True, but it was kind of embarrassing that he was driving car #1 ...To be fair to Lowndes, F3000 was insanely competitive in that time frame with up to 40 cars trying to qualify for 26 grid slots in nearly every race.
The main reason why I didn't mention him was because he did soo poorly, same can be said about Skaife.Craig Lowndes, too. He did a season of F3000 in 1997, racing for Helmut Marko with Juan Pablo Montoya as his team mate, but finished seventeenth overall with a single points-scoring finish - a fourth place at Pergusa - to his name.
If his two outings in 2009 are anything to judge by...
I think something similar happened to Brundle in junior formulae, with a similar outcome.
...I could say the same for Jochen Rindt, he went out on the very top and made an insurmountable gap in the championship before dying at the wheel. That must take talent.
I think something similar happened to Brundle in junior formulae, with a similar outcome.
Ricardo Rodriguez
You would propably call him a miracle-kid or something. So much potential carried in young person...
He was refused an entry at Le Mans in 1956, when he was 14 years old!
Not only did he put it on the front row, he was also leading at the time before a failure ended his race right?Yeah he's a Mexican former F1 driver known to possess the record of youngest driver who took the podium in the Le Mans 24 race, and youngest driver to start from the front row of the race in F1, but died during the practice session of the Mexico grand-prix by a gruesome accident like many of the others had in the then time, and most recently and notably, a brutal accident of Roland Ratzenberger and Ayrton Senna in 1994's San Marino Grand-prix. After having read a couple of articles on the F1 races in 50 ~60's, in those past years when he was still active it seemed like the race organizers had no choice but put an emphasis to use a driver who has got an extraordinary talent for whatever purpose, rather than the "safety" of those drivers that always took a back seat due to lack of technology and thus for the F1 machines being way too "prime" in today's standard.
You can put a blame on the then Ferrari team's decision to intentionally skip the grand-prix or the brains of the team didn't really deliberate about "safety" of that driver in his late teen's, but for whatever reason it's always to sad such talented people widely considered to be a "would-be" behemoth in the future.
Not only did he put it on the front row, he was also leading at the time before a failure ended his race right?
In GP2, certainly, where he could take the fight to Hülkenberg. But he was a little out of his depth once he got into Formula One, and once he moved to Caterham, it was pretty much game over.vitaly petrov , had not enough driving time ! was/is a pure talent
Seeing him now in FE, yes I would. It's tough to really gauge drivers in teams like Virgin, Caterham, and HRT.Would you agree if I said Lucas di Grassi never fulfilled his talent?
I'm going to agree with Davidson, but in a slightly different context - I think he is an absolutely fantastic commentator, and criminally under-used by Sky (though I appreciate that he has WEC commitments, I find it endlessly frustrating that Paul di Resta insists on calling Daniel Ricciardo "Danirl Ricky Ardo"). I am also going to add Karun Chandhok for the same reason, though I don't know if he is employed elsewhere. Both of them are intelligent, articulate, very engaging and don't really succumb to the cult of personality that surrounds some drivers (for example, Nico Rosberg got pole in Melbourne, but Jolyon Palmer got more air time in his post-qualifying interview). Moreover, Davidson and Chandhok walk the line between formal and colloquial; sometimes Croft and Brundle sound like they are providing commentary for a formal dinner.Noticed someone mentioning Davidson earlier and I completely agree.
He was a front runner in F3 and in GP2, definitely earned his F1 seat - albeit with a pretty weak team - and now he's fast in WEC and almost dominating Formula E. The guy has some serious talent to be quick in such a variety of cars!Seeing him now in FE, yes I would. It's tough to really gauge drivers in teams like Virgin, Caterham, and HRT.
For all we know, maybe Karthikeyan was a go- Oh I thought I could get through that without cracking up...
Davidson & Chandhok are indeed both highly professional and very intelligent.I'm going to agree with Davidson, but in a slightly different context - I think he is an absolutely fantastic commentator, and criminally under-used by Sky (though I appreciate that he has WEC commitments, I find it endlessly frustrating that Paul di Resta insists on calling Daniel Ricciardo "Danirl Ricky Ardo"). I am also going to add Karun Chandhok for the same reason, though I don't know if he is employed elsewhere. Both of them are intelligent, articulate, very engaging and don't really succumb to the cult of personality that surrounds some drivers (for example, Nico Rosberg got pole in Melbourne, but Jolyon Palmer got more air time in his post-qualifying interview). Moreover, Davidson and Chandhok walk the line between formal and colloquial; sometimes Croft and Brundle sound like they are providing commentary for a formal dinner.
They're talented broadcasters, and really what the sport needs, but they're also under-used.