- 8,239
- United Kingdom
As much as i want that to happen. I cant see how its the finale, its shows Max still had the long hair when he was crawling out of the Interceptor, then the gangs captured him and torture him etc... It clearly showed that it was in the beginning of the film from what i see.Craig's DBS was actually a second car.
The sequence where the Interceptor gets destroyed looks like the finale set-piece, so I imagine it would undergo a similar rebuild.
Is it supposed to be between 1 and 2 ? I never really read Miller actually saying it. I thought Miller said this is somekind of another story that doesn't really connected to the first trilogy, kinda like how 007 movies does.Maybe (given it's meant to take place between 1 and 2) they'll retcon in that there was a second Interceptor kept somewhere. Given that in 2 (supposedly that's after Fury Road) you see it get obliterated.
That's what I had read. But given the rather unorthodox production period of this film anything could happen.Is it supposed to be between 1 and 2 ? I never really read Miller actually saying it. I thought Miller said this is somekind of another story that doesn't really connected to the first trilogy, kinda like how 007 movies does.
Some said it was the same script as the cancelled 2003 version with Mel Gibson, some other said it is different. I'm leaning towards the first though.That's what I had read. But given the rather unorthodox production period of this film anything could happen.
Well that's the impression I'm under, and there is a lot to be told in that period but I suppose we just have to wait.If this is supposed to have sat in between 1 & 2, I'd like to see more about the breakdown of the society, rather than just skipping to the post-apocalyptic style of 2 and 3. I think that's where there is more scope for interest, rather than just a pretty formulaic chase across the desert.
The thing is there were always guns in mad max but they were hard to come by a bit, as was the ammo (Mad Max 2). However, they never ruled out that one couldn't be found, I mean after four movies him finding a hand gun is far more legit than F&F with the Charger and somehow finding the time to always build a new one while on the run.
A bit concern how Max used a handgun in the trailer, but after seeing this badass pic, all doubts are gone...
I meant that Max rarely or never used a handgun in the trilogy, so seeing him using one feels a bit odd because its the first time.The thing is there were always guns in mad max but they were hard to come by a bit, as was the ammo (Mad Max 2). However, they never ruled out that one couldn't be found, I mean after four movies him finding a hand gun is far more legit than F&F with the Charger and somehow finding the time to always build a new one while on the run.
I meant that Max rarely or never used a handgun in the trilogy, so seeing him using one feels a bit odd because its the first time.
You could be onto something there!
Can some scenes be flashbacks? Max wearing that mask and carrying someone while he has the leg brace(I can't see it from the pic above the other post) and short haircut seem to suggest that.
Well supposedly Humongous was to originally be Goose but they scrapped that idea, and seemed to play more homage to the idea in certain ways. So it's not surprising really.
The original poster. We never got to see Max like this. Though, Lord Humongous had a gang member in pursuit clothes. Could be a rouge Pursuit officer Max comes together with or he just stole the uniform.