Of course we have the ability to replicate the Nurburgring's every dip, swoop, and bump. The question is: will we? The cost of mimicking 1000 feet elevation change over a 25-square-mile area will be astronomical. I don't think Mr. Moneybags will cough up the 11-figure price tag to faithfully reproduce the naturally-occuring German terrain. It's much more than just moving piles of dirt around.
SnaeperAmerica is not about doing things originally. We have states called New York and New Hampshire as well as North and South versions of Dakota and Carolina plus West Virginia. Our movies recycle the same story ideas and plot elements over and over again. Our largest racing series is only just now getting fuel injection. We went to space because the Soviets went to space. Las Vegas makes a name for itself by making copies of things. You really think that we're going to make our own test track?.
America is not about doing things originally. We have states called New York and New Hampshire as well as North and South versions of Dakota and Carolina plus West Virginia.
Our movies recycle the same story ideas and plot elements over and over again.
Using existing valleys and mountains would actually make the project more difficult and more expensive.Joey DNevada also has some valleys and mountainous terrain so finding a suitable place might be easier than it seems.
Assuming they use a flat piece of land, they cannot simply build a roller coaster out of dirt. A pile 1000 feet tall and 40 feet wide won't stand on its own (not to mention the fact that if a car went through the fence, the plunge would be fatal). Hell, maybe they should just build a steel roller coaster and pave it! 💡Also all they would have to do is is build up the area where the track was on, the whole thing wouldn't be necessary. It would look a little out of place but it still would be to spec.
Wow, silliest anti-American comment I have heard in a while. Have you actually met an American before? Some of us actually do take pride in our countries originality here and might take extreme offense to your comment. This is my reserved comment that i editied a few times and removed what i really want to say...
New York - Brits named it
New Hampshire - Brits named it
North/South Dakota - Split due to population(also included Montana and Washington at the time of the split)
North Carolina - Brits named it
South Carolina - Brits named it
West Virginia - Split from Virginia during the Civil War
America is not about doing things originally.
Using existing valleys and mountains would actually make the project more difficult and more expensive.
Assuming they use a flat piece of land, they cannot simply build a roller coaster out of dirt. A pile 1000 feet tall and 40 feet wide won't stand on its own (not to mention the fact that if a car went through the fence, the plunge would be fatal). Hell, maybe they should just build a steel roller coaster and pave it! 💡
Using existing valleys and mountains would actually make the project more difficult and more expensive.
Assuming they use a flat piece of land, they cannot simply build a roller coaster out of dirt. A pile 1000 feet tall and 40 feet wide won't stand on its own (not to mention the fact that if a car went through the fence, the plunge would be fatal). Hell, maybe they should just build a steel roller coaster and pave it! 💡
I fail to understand how saying "Brits named it" changes this point in any way. From the get go they were naming colonies after things in England before we were even a country. And then we seceded and became our own country, we didn't change a damned thing.
Ignorance and irony indeed.
If I become a mega billionaire, one of my priorities would be to model a track after an unwound DNA sample. Go look at any microscope image of DNA unwinding from a chromosome. It's perfect.
PupikEnough...This isn't an America versus the world thread.
Go jump into the America thread in the Opinions forum if you need to rant about something that has virtually nothing to do with this thread. See how long you last...
You are aware that it's "Las Vegas" right? It isn't too far from you.
Anyway, I really doubt this will come to fruition. It's just a mere pipe dream. Yes, they may lure American manufacturers away from the ring, but I doubt it.
Maybe I'm being cynical but it looks like another thing Vegas will try to copy and will end up with something incredibly tacky. There's only one Nurburgring, same way there's only one Eiffel tower (well before Blackpool had a go anyway), London bridge or whatever....let's try and keep it that way.
vowcartaMaybe I'm being cynical but it looks like another thing Vegas will try to copy and will end up with something incredibly tacky. There's only one Nurburgring, same way there's only one Eiffel tower (well before Vegas had a go anyway), London bridge or whatever....let's try and keep it that way.
Agreed like who would rather go to a fake one? one of the things i eventually want to do when i get the money is go to the real one and buy or rent a car or two and take it around this awesome track... not a fake one... If i had the option of never going or go to Vegas... I'll just keep playing GT5
R1600TurboYou say that now.
Agreed like who would rather go to a fake one?
I don't think that's what he means. The difference between the Texas World Speedway and the old Monza was that at the old Monza, you could do a lap of the oval and then a lap of the road course; one lap used to involve doing both. At the Texas World Speedway, you can do a lap of the oval or the road course.