- 66
- nottingham
- doctorpotford
Personally I think that this is a bad rule. Also I wasn't aware of it, and it encourages people to break the rules/be more aggressive if they think nobody will be watching or they are racing a 'more friendly, accidents happen' attitude driver.
In Formula 1 if a driver is responsible for an incident they get punished, regardless if anybody reports it because everybody can see the incident happening on TV. Watching the replay, it's obvious when a big incident occurs because you just see cars instantly drop right down the order.
I agree that this rule is a little flawed, but it's the best compromise available.
It's quite an assumption to say you'll drop down the order after an incident. Maybe in the early stages of the race but towards the end there can be some large gaps between drivers so that makes this method of reporting incidents very inconsistent.
The only sure way to do it would be to check every lap of every race for incidents which would take many many hours hence why we limit it to 2 or 3 laps as a majority of incidents happen during this time.
The way we currently do it, any incidents in a race will hopefully police themselves, most of us know the difference between a hard but fair move and a piece of blatant poor driving so it's left to the 'victims' discretion as to which one it is. I know it puts all the responsibility onto them but if they feel strongly about it, a report will be made.
Any alternative is either very time consuming or pot luck if it gets spotted.
Hope this helps. 👍