Modern car designs ugly?

  • Thread starter Neddo
  • 365 comments
  • 31,176 views
Well, Audi ripoff grills are just the current design trend. About a decade ago, everyone was copying the 7 series. A couple years before that everyone was putting F1-esque front splitters on everything. It's just a design fad.
 
If you look throughout the history of automotive car design, you'll pretty see no one has ever been creative, they all just copy off of each other.
Big three in the states are by far the most apparent in this regard.
 
Big three in the states are by far the most apparent in this regard.

In the past, absolutely. I'd argue they're doing quite a good job of staying different from one another these days. The Impala doesn't too much look like the Taurus (well, other than the face), and neither looks very much like the 300. The Malibu/Fusion/200 are also fairly easy to identify, too.

Come to think of it, while it's conservative, I really like the look of the current Impala:

2014-impala-model-overview-exterior-cnt-well-1-980X476-02-1.jpg


It's a solid, clean design, but American. Not a clean, boring design, like what Ford tried when it ripped off VAG products in the early 2000's with the awful Five Hundred.
 
In the past, absolutely. I'd argue they're doing quite a good job of staying different from one another these days. The Impala doesn't too much look like the Taurus (well, other than the face), and neither looks very much like the 300. The Malibu/Fusion/200 are also fairly easy to identify, too.

Come to think of it, while it's conservative, I really like the look of the current Impala:

2014-impala-model-overview-exterior-cnt-well-1-980X476-02-1.jpg


It's a solid, clean design, but American. Not a clean, boring design, like what Ford tried when it ripped off VAG products in the early 2000's with the awful Five Hundred.
It was pretty apparent back then, all the way up until now, but it was always 1 brand does something, the other follows. From what I understand, Ford would do something, GM would follow suit in a year or two, and Chrysler would rake it in.
 
Of course you would see it that way.
But with reason.

Ford debuted the Model T. GM fired right back in a few years. Dodge followed shortly after.
Ford came out with the F1 series trucks. GM fired back with the Custom series. Dodge followed shortly after.
Ford came out with the Ranchero in the 50s. GM fired back with the El Camino. Dodge came out with the Rampage.
Ford came out with the Mustang. GM fired back with the Camaro and the Firebird. Dodge the Cuda/Challenger.


See where I'm going with this? There's plenty more examples, those are just the most obvious ones.
 
It was pretty apparent back then, all the way up until now, but it was always 1 brand does something, the other follows. From what I understand, Ford would do something, GM would follow suit in a year or two, and Chrysler would rake it in.
Most of the last 20 years it has gone more like this, some manufacturer from Japan/Europe (or Ford Europe), in 1-3 years one of the "Big three", if first one won't fail (sometimes even if that happens), second and short after that third US manufacturer. For example the "New edge" came from Ford Europe and Pt Cruiser (which inspired Chevrolet HHR) was inspired by Volkswagen New Beetle.
 
Last edited:
Most of the last 20 years it has gone more like this, some manufacturer from Japan/Europe (or Ford Europe), in 1-3 years one of the "Big three", if first one won't fail (sometimes even if that happens), second and short after that third US manufacturer.
I will admit as time progressed to an extent it hasn't nearly been as bad. That's for sure. Up until 2005 it wasn't too bad; now with the flagship pony cars back it's been a battle royal in that department. Not so much elsewhere.
 
I think the designs of this decade are turning out much better than in the '00s, a decade defined to me by unfinished concept-looking cars, plucked straight from an auto show floor. Awkward experimental shapes, plain-looking bumpers and panels, and not enough trim or details to add contrast. Some of today's cars are too "busy" or outlandishly proportioned, but they certainly look finished.

Some '10s designs are so cohesive (to me) that it's like they've been sculpted from a solid block of metal, glass, and plastic. However, maybe high performance cars haven't fared as well as everyday compacts and such. Ferrari hasn't built an attractive car in about ten years, IMO.
Thing is, only about six of those look close in resemblance, to me. So i don't really see that as a great example..
Can't agree there, perhaps I'm the only person who thinks several of those cars look very dissimilar, and the ones that are most similar usually have a relationship of sorts. A 928 does not look like an Escort does not look like an RX-7. Oh wait, they are all red though, and from the same era.
The intention was not total homogeneity, but to group similar-looking cars together, with an overall theme of '70s-'80s two-door cars with sloped rooflines.
 
If we ignore current trends (let's face it trends always happen...) cars look great.

Obviously not to everyone but if we look at Vision GT, we can see what talent design teams actually have, things like the VW are simply stunning and rather surprising from VW, known for carbon copy cookie cutting the range. Even then, the new Golf is actually a handsome car in an inoffensive way like a Gen 1 Ford Focus.
 
Chrylser 300 is probarly the only Chrylser today which doesn't follow any kitsch European/Japanese styles (found in more and more American cars) other than good old muscle and ofc the concept from 2003

2014-chrysler-300c-john-var.jpg
 
The intention was not total homogeneity, but to group similar-looking cars together, with an overall theme of '70s-'80s two-door cars with sloped rooflines.

OK but many of them are not similar looking, and you would find it a lot easier with cars of the 90s, 00s or 10s. It's just a very facile kinda meme, or whatever it is. Pics of a bunch of cars (many related) in profile, in the same colour.
 
In the past, absolutely. I'd argue they're doing quite a good job of staying different from one another these days. The Impala doesn't too much look like the Taurus (well, other than the face), and neither looks very much like the 300. The Malibu/Fusion/200 are also fairly easy to identify, too.

Come to think of it, while it's conservative, I really like the look of the current Impala:

2014-impala-model-overview-exterior-cnt-well-1-980X476-02-1.jpg


It's a solid, clean design, but American. Not a clean, boring design, like what Ford tried when it ripped off VAG products in the early 2000's with the awful Five Hundred.

Look, it's a Honda Accord! :lol::

2015-honda-accord-sedan-sport-exterior-side1.jpg
 
While I think the Toyota Mirai is atrocious, I get it. Cars that deviate so greatly from the pack mechanically should deviate just as much visually. It can be risky, though. Tesla remained conservative with the Model S, not wanting to take advantage of what packaging an EV allows and instead keeping its appearance "normal." And then there's the i8...
 
Back