Challenge accepted. Yeah, nobody could stop Jordan, but he's not shooting 3s like the splash Bros. It's the system with the movement and the screens that gives them their success. They're so good at executing the offense that they always get a good shot. That's what would give them the edge in today's physicality-eschewed NBA.
As if that makes a difference? Curry averaged 30.1 points per game this season. Michael Jordan averaged 30.4
without Curry's beloved 3-ball. Michael's team is one of the best perimeter defense teams of all time as well. Even if they can't stop Curry, who's stopping Michael?
In the Playoffs, Curry averaged 28.3 points. Michael averaged 30.7. In the Finals, Curry averages 26 points where as Michael averaged 33.5 among 6 Finals performances. His lowest was 27, his highest was 41. Warriors aren't stopping Michael in a best of 7. The sheer fact you have to mention
today's NBA shows concedes the fact they have no chance. Take into account, teams only averaged 15 threes a game back then, so you think the Bulls won't take advantage of averaging well over 20? Because on the other side of that coin, the Warriors are done with that kind of limitation.
The Bulls would feast in an era where hand checking is illegal & you can't play physical D unlike the Warriors (Curry today got frustrated by Beverly's defense). The Bulls just went up against a lot better teams than the Warriors ever did including a young Shaq. Take away the physicality Jordan went up against, and he's going to take full advantage. All this before we factor in the Triangle Offense & Phil Jackson at the helm.
The Warriors wouldn't even be able to beat the 56-26 2001 Lakers. They'd get absolutely destroyed in that by Shaq alone before Kobe came into play.