- 3,345
- Mexico
I've seen fridges with more personality... the current electric car body styling language is so bland and boring.
I've seen fridges with more personality... the current electric car body styling language is so bland and boring.
I didn't say any place, or for anyone. I don't live where there are traffic jams; that's a life choice I wouldn't make with any car, for more reasons than just the traffic.Yeah, especially when you take a Lamborghini Diablo through a traffic jam.
Of course, still, these new generations of cars will be far more efficient than the existing ones thanks mainly to their powerplants, not aerodynamics alone, so why they should all look like Cars 3 models? There is not a single original styling statement in this car.It has to do with aerodynamics. Interesting shapes with sharp lines rarely provide the lowest coefficient of drag.
Of course, still, these new generations of cars will be far more efficient than the existing ones thanks mainly to their powerplants, not aerodynamics alone, so why they should all look like Cars 3 models? There is not a single original styling statement in this car.
If you can make something at home, it doesn't mean the result won't suck.
James May has made a full-sized motorcycle that actually runs entirely out of Meccano parts. Needless to say its top speed was 25mph, which it could only reach going down the hill.
By the way, not sure about ICEs, but you can make fully functional transmissions out of Lego nowadays.
With electric power, every advantage is extremely important when it comes to increasing range. If they can extend the overall range by just a couple of miles, it's worth it since that seems to be the biggest sticking point with EVs.
I agree the car doesn't look particularly interesting, but if they want to hit 600 miles of range and 250 mph, the aerodynamics need to be on point.
250 mph is a vain goal to begin with in the real world. Give me the car that goes 600 miles, is enjoyable to drive at 80-100 mph and I can distinguish in a parking lot.
To be quite honest, there's no benefit to it in my life either. Like there's no practical benefit to owning a car that goes faster than the law will allow. However, that doesn't keep me from admiring cars that can do crazy things.in my life there's little to no practical benefit to shifting faster than I am able to myself or taking away the need to operate a clutch.
I've seen fridges with more personality... the current electric car body styling language is so bland and boring.
why they should all look like Cars 3 models? There is not a single original styling statement in this car.
Gotta say that I really like how simple, clean and modest this car's look is. The only example of similarly modest design I can remember is Aston Martin DB10.I agree the car doesn't look particularly interesting
Something along the lines of these:Mm you are right, but if the construction/design is simple enough that people with too much spare time can do then imagine what a big cooperation can do.
Now that's a question worth raising. Batteries are toxic, and so is their production. Unless a "greener" battery development technology is invented, a switch to EVs will barely benefit the environment, if it will benefit at all.But the thing I am still questioning is how clean the electricity will be and how good the local enviroment will be when the demand skyrockets for precious metals for the batteries if we dont move to some other tech in this aspect.
I think what's gonna sell Roadster is its acceleration, not top speed. Agera RS already got past 270mph mark, which Roadster won't reach.Top speed numbers sell cars.
Top speed numbers sell cars. It's why things like Chiron and that Koenigsegg exist and why Hennessey is building that stupid car that probably will never work. We are in a golden age right now of top speed vehicles and the race to break the 300 mph barrier is on. Even if that speed is never usable, people will buy those cars because they're capable of the speed and they brag about it.
0 - 60mph is metric? Really? >>> United States customary units or ImperialI think that some of the metrics that Musk announced for this car aren't in the prototype, but rather projections of what the final product in 2020 will have. Musk doesn't present it like that, but that's how I see it. The only real metric that they were able to show was the 1.9s 0-60 acceleration, as they were able to demonstrate to the people who put in a 50k deposit post-event. Call me a skeptic, but unless there is concrete and empirical evidence for those numbers, I'm taking the whole thing with a grain of salt.
What do you mean with the real metric? Maybe I am wrong in assuming that you are talking about 0 - 60mph?
0 - 60mph is metric? Really? >>> United States customary units or Imperial
0 - 96.59kph is metric! >>> Metric system.
Unless they mean 0 - 60kph, which doesn't make any sense in termse of acceleration of a car when you want to let people know how fast a car accelerates. It's common to use 0 - 60mph or 0 - 62mph or 0 - 100kph.
Tesla is an American company. They measure in the Imperial system. So it's MPH.By 'metrics' I mean the measurements or numbers that they claimed, not denoting to the SI system. I should've clarified that. But my other points still remain.
Okay, I thought you were talking about the metric system. You were talking about the numbers without classifiying these numbers in a certain system.By 'metrics' I mean the measurements or numbers that they claimed, not denoting to the SI system. I should've clarified that. But my other points still remain.
Tesla is an American company. They measure in the Imperial system. So it's MPH.
Lots of companies still cling to Imperial here. We sell food by the pound, we measure in lbs/oz, tons, etc. The only reference to metric I've seen is...Honestly I can't even remember. We still use MPH, gallons/quarts/pints too.But then the question is, do they design the car using metric or imperial systems? I think I know which they use without even guessing. I would be so surprised if anybody even a company in US that would still cling to the imperial system there
In this case, that would be a contradiction.But then the question is, do they design the car using metric or imperial systems? I think I know which they use without even guessing.
It is not what Tesla is using, it is what the journalists are using. In this case imperial. If they used metric, the figures would have been, 0 - 100kph and a range of approximately of 1000km.Just wanted to point out that 620 miles (of Roadster's range on one charge) approximately equals 1000 kilometers. Still, that doesn't prove which measuring system Tesla uses.
(imo imperial measuring system is rudimentary and only exists to trouble people who use SI nowadays)
It is true that Tesla claims a 0-60 of 1.9 seconds, but 2.0 to 2.1 sounds more plausible, so I'm not really in firm disagreement on their claimed acceleration figure.Okay, I thought you were talking about the metric system. You were talking about the numbers without classifiying these numbers in a certain system.
I believe that the Tesla Roadster 2 is capable of reaching 60mph in only 1.9 sec.
The developers of the Elextra say that their car can do 100kph in less than 2.3 sec. So, the Tesla Roadster is probably going to hit 62mph in 2.0 - 2.1 sec.
A little over three years and we will find out.It is true that Tesla claims a 0-60 of 1.9 seconds, but 2.0 to 2.1 sounds more plausible, so I'm not really in firm disagreement on their claimed acceleration figure.
It's the other claims like the top speed and the range that leave me feeling skeptical, given the current state of lithium ion technology. This is why I think these other claims are projections of what the base model will have in 2020, I highly doubt that the prototype shown at the event actually has those top speed and range specs.
Someone at Jalopnik asked a battery researcher if that number is plausible. I don't really trust Jalopnik in general, but they're the only ones who asked an opinion of someone who's at least remotely competent.The number I have my doubt about
- 650 mile on a single charge (maybe this is under the most ideal circumstances)
Well I mean... it's something you could pretty much guess. It has a battery double the size of a Model S so it's not hugely surprising that it can go twice as far.Someone at Jalopnik asked a battery researcher if that number is plausible. I don't really trust Jalopnik in general, but they're the only ones who asked an opinion of someone who's at least remotely competent.
Is it that simple when it comes to the range an electric car can drive with certain batteries? With a gasoline/diesel engine; the same car, same weight, same conditions, but with 50L fuel tank and the after that the same car with 100L fuel tank doubles the amount of km this car can drive (or is it ride), theoretically. But is it with electric cars and batteries as simple and straight forward as with ICE's? It should but I wonder ..............Well I mean... it's something you could pretty much guess. It has a battery double the size of a Model S so it's not hugely surprising that it can go twice as far.
As good as that looks, I was hoping for an affordable Tesla, something just above MX-5 and GT86 performance, but just under Cayman/4C to keep it affordable.
There's a reason the greenhouse tapers laterally. It's good for aerodynamics. If you look closely, quite a few cars do this, but obviously sports cars can afford to do it more abruptly.Is it just me, or can anyone else see 718 Cayman in the rear profile?
It barely makes a difference, at least in the work I do. Units are handled automatically a lot of the time, so metric doesn't make anything easier. The best units are the ones that make sense to you.But then the question is, do they design the car using metric or imperial systems? I think I know which they use without even guessing. I would be so surprised if anybody even a company in US that would still cling to the imperial system there
Teardrop shape is perfect for aerodynamics. It makes perfect sense to adapt it into sports cars.There's a reason the greenhouse tapers laterally. It's good for aerodynamics.