- 5,987
The louvred side intake is what gets me the most. Seems to be one of the weaker elements.
I see a lot of Gallardo and 458 in that.
Introducing the Mclaren Evora!
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/08/mclaren-mp4-12c-first-batch-of-details-and-images-surface/
I don't see why not if the body can withstand the speeds & there's enough power to get it there. 200+Mph is already becoming a bit of a standard in supercars.You guys think this car can achieve 220 mph?
Well, of course, but I'm not sure what point you're trying to make by bringing up the Z06 dash in relation to my post.^200 mph is even written on the Z06 Corvette's dash, but it doesn't get to that speed though.
Well, of course, but I'm not sure what point you're trying to make by bringing up the Z06 dash in relation to my post.
Oh god, no. Mercedes screwed McLaren over when they were together. McLaren pretty much built the entire SLR, handling all the testing & what not themselves. Then Mercedes took the car & threw McLaren's name at the very end of model as if to say, "Oh btw, thanks!"This won't do well mainstream, it will sell well to collectors and thats about it. Even the name doesnt do it for me. They should stick to doing Merc's.
Robin.
Oh god, no. Mercedes screwed McLaren over when they were together. McLaren pretty much built the entire SLR, handling all the testing & what not themselves. Then Mercedes took the car & threw McLaren's name at the very end of model as if to say, "Oh btw, thanks!"
This won't do well mainstream, it will sell well to collectors and thats about it. Even the name doesnt do it for me. They should stick to doing Merc's.
That there is how you design a good looking car. Yeah, the double inlets may be a tad over the top, but everything else just seems perfect.
The problem I think is that the car is just too forgettable. I really do like the design of the car but it just doesn't leave a lasting impression. Study it all you want, but it just gets forgotten as much as you look away. In order to sell, they did need to make something that is more memorable.
Just going to leave this here for future folks.
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showpost.php?p=3537814&postcount=53
Well you changed opinions pretty quick. "Perfect" and "forgettable" shouldn't really be used to describe the same car. Simplicity in design has created some of the most memorable, well-executed and timeless products. Timelessness inherently comes when "less is more" is used well.
2007 isn't that long ago and in all likelyhood the Evora and 458 were well in development already at that time. I don't think anybody copied anyone else, it is just the general design direction of cars that always has them having some similarities. To throw another car in the mix, the rear window reminds me of the Audi R8.
And by that consensus, that means the P11 had possibly even more development time before it was shown in 2007 as well. However, 2 years is quite a bit of time, as that's about the usual time spent to get a new supercar ready. Lamborghini only needed that amount of time to get the Murcielago directly after scrapping the Kanto.2007 isn't that long ago and in all likelyhood the Evora and 458 were well in development already at that time. I don't think anybody copied anyone else, it is just the general design direction of cars that always has them having some similarities. To throw another car in the mix, the rear window reminds me of the Audi R8.