Nissan Formula One team?

I don't think they'll succes. Nissan should not even thinking about to join F1.
They should stay and focus on JGTC and other motorsports ;)
 
Renault and Nissan are partners. Renault do F1. There is no point in both of them being there.
 
Exactly. Besides, with Toyota struggling, Nissan would have to be weary of joining F1, at least as a full team. They could provide engines, ala Honda.
 
daan
Renault and Nissan are partners. Renault do F1. There is no point in both of them being there.

Gah! Beat me to it.

However, there are perpetual rumours that a Customer Renault engine may turn up at some point, with the word "Nissan" on the cam covers.
 
Audi was thinking of joining F1 some time ago but decided it was to costly. I would wish however if the VW Audi group was to enter a lamborghini chassis with audi engines.
 
Double_R
Audi was thinking of joining F1 some time ago but decided it was to costly. I would wish however if the VW Audi group was to enter a lamborghini chassis with audi engines.



Imagine skoda chassis and VW engine :dopey:
 
GilesGuthrie
Gah! Beat me to it.

However, there are perpetual rumours that a Customer Renault engine may turn up at some point, with the word "Nissan" on the cam covers.

The infamous Renault launch control is actually a Nissan designed system.
:)
 
daan
Renault and Nissan are partners. Renault do F1. There is no point in both of them being there.

True, but you have Peugeot and Citroen competing against each other in the WRC. Peugeot and Citroen form the PSA group.
 
daggoth
True, but you have Peugeot and Citroen competing against each other in the WRC. Peugeot and Citroen form the PSA group.
But that is the WRC. It's a completely different kettle of fish, and a good deal cheaper. And they are both pulling out at the end of this year.
 
What are the regulations for engines in F1? I'd like to see Mazda enter F1, with a 4 rotor.
 
ND4SPD
What are the regulations for engines in F1? I'd like to see Mazda enter F1, with a 4 rotor.

Couldn't happen, at least the four rotor part. If they were somehow able to enter today for this season, they would have to develop a 3.0 liter V10. After this year though (I think it is next year), that changes to a 2.4 liter V8. At least, I'm pretty sure that how the regulations are regarding engines.

On another note, I kinda miss the days when the manufacturer could decide on which configuration of engine they wished to run, so long as its displacement was the right size.
 
Yes you are correct, this year it is a 3.0 litre V10 format and next year it will be a 2.4 litre V8 format.

It would be interesting too see a variety of engine configurations on the track at one time, it could possibly make a better show and bring some more interest to the sport, it is unfortunate however, I don't see that happening anytime soon.

Blake
 
That is one of the reasons it is so cool to watch the F1 Decade's on SPEED from the early nineties. They were able to have different configurations and the teams did. It made for a more exciting product.
 
I missed out on the 90s, I only really started following F1 at the start of the MS era, I haven't seen MS beaten to the championship before :indiff:. So really I hve very little exposure to race footage from those eras past, I should really look for a few old race videos.

Blake
 
Thats all that I have seen also. But I have also caught the showings of F1 Decade on SPEED. The early 90s races are fun to watch.
 
1986 was the best season ever. Prost, Senna, Mansell & Piquet all racing at the same time.
 
I don't think Mazda would enter. Aren't they part owned my Dodge or something. And isn't Dodge like owned by a German manufacturer?

I know about the Nissan-Renault relationship not only because Renault bought out Nissan (to save them from embarassment) but because some of the good drivers from the Nissan World Series get a test for Renault time to time.
 
liam2maps
I don't think Mazda would enter. Aren't they part owned my Dodge or something. And isn't Dodge like owned by a German manufacturer?
If Mazda were to consider entering F1, they would want to do so with a rotary engine. So they couldn't enter as rotaries aren't allowed.

Ford own ~49% of Mazda. (EDIT: I just checked and it's 33.6%)

Dodge are owned by DaimlerChrysler.

Note the quote by Duke in my sig.....
 
daan
If Mazda were to consider entering F1, they would want to do so with a rotary engine. So they couldn't enter as rotaries aren't allowed.

Ford own ~49% of Mazda. (EDIT: I just checked and it's 33.6%)

Dodge are owned by DaimlerChrysler.

Note the quote by Duke in my sig.....

Yep. Everyone brings there best talents to the table. Renault people are good with Chassis and Engine, Honda with Gears and Engine.

People say Toyota has a great engine as well but I don't know whether that's because they were able to purchase a Ferrari technician to help them with it's creation or because of their own work.

I don't think a Rotary would do so well. I mean rotaries have more moving parts right? Meaning more chance something will go boom. What I know is the more complicated an engine is and the more moving parts not only means the more chance for something to go wrong but more wear and tear.
 
Rotaries have less moving parts. A V10 has 10 cylinders moving up and down. The engine in the 787B has 4 rotors spinning.
 
Sort of off topic: Why the hell are (or were really, it's not as true any more) rotaries so unreliable?

Blake
 
When it comes to race rotaries, it would be just like any other type of motor. If they are not built to last, then they will fail.

But when it comes to rotaries that are driven daily, from what I've read at various RX-7/rotary forums, is that rotaries relability is pretty much directly correlated to how well the engines are taken care of. There are some specific things that have be done to take care of them and keep them running. But like any other type of engine, there are some that still have problems no matter how well taken care of they are.

From what I've read and gathered, it seems to be common that the seals that seal the three chambers in rotaries are usually considered to be a weak link in the engine. If one of those shatters, well a whole lot of problems arise real quickly.
 
liam2maps
Yep. Everyone brings there best talents to the table. Renault people are good with Chassis and Engine, Honda with Gears and Engine.

People say Toyota has a great engine as well but I don't know whether that's because they were able to purchase a Ferrari technician to help them with it's creation or because of their own work.

I don't think a Rotary would do so well. I mean rotaries have more moving parts right? Meaning more chance something will go boom. What I know is the more complicated an engine is and the more moving parts not only means the more chance for something to go wrong but more wear and tear.

wow, you should brush up on some research. two servings of bad info between the rotaries and the mazda-dodge deal....that's harsh.

no offense or anything, just adding a pair of pennies.

anyway, if rotaries WERE allowed, does anyone think that any other teams would use them? like, do rotaries have better potential than the regular v10s? i'd think not, but it never hurts to ask. lol.
 
daan
Renault and Nissan are partners. Renault do F1. There is no point in both of them being there.

Itd be the same situation as in the BTCC a few years ago. Both renault and Nissan were in that but they pulled the Renault team coz it was embarrassing to see them lose to a company theyd just bought.
Same with ford and Volvo in the same series and at the same time. Volvo was pulled but Im ot sure why....they were still doing better than Ford.
Oh and the same in WRC both PSA companies compete til the end of this year then thats that! Au Revior!
I dont see why companies cant compete just because theyre owned by one company. If they have a distinct enough brand it should be ok. And hey if it boosts sales and improves the brand why not?
 
VashTheStampede
When it comes to race rotaries, it would be just like any other type of motor. If they are not built to last, then they will fail.

But when it comes to rotaries that are driven daily, from what I've read at various RX-7/rotary forums, is that rotaries relability is pretty much directly correlated to how well the engines are taken care of. There are some specific things that have be done to take care of them and keep them running. But like any other type of engine, there are some that still have problems no matter how well taken care of they are.

From what I've read and gathered, it seems to be common that the seals that seal the three chambers in rotaries are usually considered to be a weak link in the engine. If one of those shatters, well a whole lot of problems arise real quickly.


Do you honestly think that the engines in F1 are built to last if they're replaced every couple of races? Those engines get so hot that the exhaust manifold goes TRANSPARENT. You can SEE THROUGH IT, it gets so hot. F1 engines have leading edge technology, if you compare one to an Indy/CART/IRL engine...well, it would be like comparing a tricycle to a Hayabusa.

I think the potential for rotaries would be great, I'm sure they could devise a way to make them work well. They have a remarkably simple design, but I think the fuel consumption might be a problem. Rotaries are high-revving enough as it is, but an F1 piston engine rev's around 20,000rpm, so a Rotary would surely be doing about 25,000-30,000rpm, which could present overheating problems. If it were restricted to 3.0litres, however, a four rotar would probably have to be de-tuned! The 787b is already producing massive amounts of horsepower, and it's barely trying. A 3.0litre 4rotor could easily hit 1000hp with the right precautions (as taken by any half-decent F1 car). You guys should consult MazKid or ND4SPD, they know quite a bit about rotaries.
 
Back