- 848
- Indiana
- DSkywalker01
Any word from Darren @DSkywalker01 ?
None at the moment.
Any word from Darren @DSkywalker01 ?
I just realized something: Despite the driver sitting behind the engine and not in front of it, the car is technically mid-engined.
Front mid-engine to be precise. It is such a fascinating LMP concept when you go FWD and use flywheel for the rear.I just realized something: Despite the driver sitting behind the engine and not in front of it, the car is technically mid-engined.
This. Just so much this.I'm looking forward to the issue of Racecar Engineering dealing with this car.
FMFWD (Front-Mid-Engine Front Wheel Drive)So that would be an "MFWD" (Mid-engined and Front Wheel Drive) 💡
FMFWDAWK-FMFWD (Front-Mid-Engine Front Wheel Drive)
Holly balls. Previously car journalists loses their mind when they saw a Front engined Panoz. Now this, Front Wheel Drive?!
My favourite part of the first video was when it scooted out of the garage all nekkid, like...
The rear end is fascinating.
Also, where does the cooling air for the intercoolers come from? They sit behind the front wheel wells, and there's no obvious ducting. Does it come from under the car and, once warmed, is sent into the vast "tunnels" that head rearwards?
What a strange and wonderful car this is.
The 'good old days' are happening now, we are lucky enough to witness it.
Because Baretzky is very very smart.Can anyone please explain how Audi and their diesel engine manages to stay competitive despite all the energy and fuel handicaps they have? I assume it's an inherent advantage of diesel fuel but I'd like to get a clear-ish explanation if anyone knows...
holy crap! You're right. if you imagine it without the front wheel wells, it does look shockingly similar to the delta wing!The car if u look hard enough is ff.the engine is located behind the front axle but not behind the driver in most mid engined applications.to me it is as if they took the chassis of a delta wing and turned it around and slightly widened the would be front.
Everyone in this field is "very very smart". Dont forget that diesel fuel has a huge efficiency advantage over petrol. While the best petrol engine runs near 39-41% efficiency, diesel is 'easily' at 43%, probably closer to 50 than 40. More efficient fuel usage = higher power from the regulated flow.Because Baretzky is very very smart.
They are smart but not Baretzky smart, this guy is the Adrian newey and Rory Byrne combined in the engine building world.Everyone in this field is "very very smart". Dont forget that diesel fuel has a huge efficiency advantage over petrol. While the best petrol engine runs near 39-41% efficiency, diesel is 'easily' at 43%, probably closer to 50 than 40. More efficient fuel usage = higher power from the regulated flow.
Yeah, I see the parallel intercoolers now (big chunks of ribbed aluminium under the turbos), still not sure where they're fed from (the nose doesn't contain ducting for it).The car has a "flow through" aero design. So the air taken through the front end flows through the engine bay, and around the side the driver cell, and out the back.
I can't find a perfect shot of the intercooler placement, but if I had to out money on it, I would say they are part of that flow through design concept. I don't believe they are directly behind the front wheel, but rather angled forward, and to the side, parallel to the engine block. Similar to the radiators on the Honda RC-51 motorcycle.
Hopefully we get some more shots of the mechanicals soon.
They say they will be open to putting all their engineering on display, so I'm looking forward to seeing some more in-depth information about their air management through the body, and cooling systems.
They were beaten soundly by Peugeot at their own game (diesel). But of course, Le Mans is the most important. This has nothing to do with the Nissan though.They are smart but not Baretzky smart, this guy is the Adrian newey and Rory Byrne combined in the engine building world.
Apart from in 2007,2008,2010 and 2011........They were beaten soundly by Peugeot at their own game (diesel). But of course, Le Mans is the most important. This has nothing to do with the Nissan though.
So the company that had engine failure built the better engine ok thenDriver error and a failed connecting rod (technically not peugeot's fault) would have made it 3-2 Peugeot. Not to mention that Peugeot had more power and went just as long in a stint. Then in 2011 under new rules went further per stint and had just as much power if not more. In 2014 they had to replace the turbos. Sorry, but Audi is not infallable, and their engines are nowhere near the best even with a diesel advantage.