- 7,956
- BradleyH131
Maybe drive it in.. with a Saab or something, no one pays attention to them
I reckon a Saab in North Korea would stick out as much as a Pink Cadillac.
What do they drive in North Korea anyway?
Maybe drive it in.. with a Saab or something, no one pays attention to them
I reckon a Saab in North Korea would stick out as much as a Pink Cadillac.
What do they drive in North Korea anyway?
...in a ground war against guerrillas.But, the American's are stretched pretty thin to become militarily engaged.
I wanna hear how China reacts to this before anything else.
They'd never get as far as the US. None of their missiles have ever done over a 1,000 miles afaik, besides there will be millions of satelites and missiles (most probably nuclear submarines) pointing at the DPRK right now.
I won't second guess what move the DPRK will make next, impossible in my eyes. Not long ago it felt like we were getting somewhere, then Kim-Jong got ill and now wants to go out with a bang, seemingly.
Who would come to their aid? Honestly?
I'd love to know what a "thousandfold retaliation" would consist of, considering that NorKo only has 6 nukes tops and no way of delivering them to the US.
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - North Korea may launch a long-range ballistic missile toward Hawaii in early July, a Japanese news report said Thursday, as Russia and China urged the regime to return to international disarmament talks on its rogue nuclear program.
The missile, believed to be a long-range Taepodong-2, would be launched from North Korea's Dongchang-ni site on the northwestern coast, said the Yomiuri daily, Japan's top-selling newspaper. It cited an analysis by the Japanese Defense Ministry and intelligence gathered by U.S. reconnaissance satellites.
The missile launch could come between July 4 and 8, the paper said.
NBC NewsFirst test case for sanctions
In what would be the first test case for the sanctions, the U.S. military has begun tracking a North Korean-flagged ship, Kang Nam, which left a port in North Korea on Wednesday, two U.S. officials said.
The ship, which may be carrying illicit weapons, was in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of China on Thursday, the officials said on condition of anonymity because they were discussing intelligence.
It was uncertain what the Kang Nam was carrying, but it has been involved in weapons proliferation before, one of the officials said. However, no-one has suggested that it may be carrying nuclear material.
U.S. military officials also predict the situation could come to a head over the next couple of days when the Kang Nam is expected to run out of fuel. Under the additional sanctions slapped on North Korea last week, the U.N. could ask the port country to withhold fuel until the ship could be boarded and searched.
It was not clear yet whether the USS John S. McCain aircraft carrier would confront the Kang Nam and ask the crew for permission to board and search the ship. The U.N. resolution does not permit nor would the U.S. military forcibly board the ship, according to Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen. Instead the McCain would continue to follow the ship until it had to put into port.