mafia_boy
(Banned)
- 5,570
- GTP_Mafiaboy
I'm terribly sorry for this, but I feel I must:
The ideal system of judging would take both of those situations into account, and is entirely conceivable. In fact, it was implemented in the Vintage Tuning Competition, which returned pitifully few judging results. Essentially, a rubric which only tests the tuned versions requires half as much driving and testing as a rubric which tests both the tuned and untuned state of the cars.
It's a simple matter of the lazy public. The new rubric largely ignores the quality of the base car with the purpose of making judging a less labour-intensive process. If it's easier, it's more likely that more people will do it, and we are definitely in the range where we want more results.
Understood?
And this is 1/2 the reason why my AWD judging has taken so long. I can go any way around on this and look at the various ways we can judge:
1. Look at the base car and compare it to the tuned version.
2. Just drive the tuned versions compared to a known great car in your garage (like Touge Challenge).
3. Drive the tuned versions and find the drivability of each car around the circuit of choice without comparison.
While some does promote a sense of 'laziness', others are also too tedious for some who have fast lives to be able to spend time to do in that fashion and want to contribute to the judging process. Granted, it doesn't get perfect results and gets some of our feathers ruffled (like mine