- 21,193
- United States
- nk4e
Blowing up a train over a long, high bridge in a popular US city.
or a small town.
Looks like it has started.
Blowing up a train over a long, high bridge in a popular US city.
*snip*
Blowing up a train over a long, high bridge in a popular US city.
In my opinion pics or it didn't happen
Well there is one thing to gain - not getting sued.
This is what I meant when I said there's no gain for the US to release the pictures. Al Qaeda will use them as propaganda, and people like you will say it's photoshop.
A conservative legal watchdog group has filed the first lawsuit seeking public release of video and photographs of the U.S. military raid and aftermath that left al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden dead.
So if something does happen if the people get what they want, does that make us bad as awhole? If we do not get what we want, how badly are we going to criticize the Obama Administration?This historic lawsuit should remind the Obama administration that it is not above the law."
What do you mean by "something", and why would people forcing the government to abide their own laws be "bad"?So if something does happen if the people get what they want, does that make us bad as awhole?
You sound like you don't want Obama's feeling to get hurt.If we do not get what we want, how badly are we going to criticize the Obama Administration?
Now I could be wrong but couldn't it be argued that keeping the pictures of Bin Laden from the public is considered an interest of national defense due to the possibility of terrorist retaliation?(A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and (B) are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order;
Yes, but then, so could the fact that my wife has a job, I have two cars, three game consoles, HDTV, satellite, and many other forms of excess. It could be argued that every time we do something from fear of terrorist retaliation that Bin Laden's goals on 9/11 were achieved.So I did a simple search on the Freedom of Information Act. The first exemption in this act is:
Now I could be wrong but couldn't it be argued that keeping the pictures of Bin Laden from the public is considered an interest of national defense due to the possibility of terrorist retaliation?
Sun Tzu (The Art of War) and Niccolo Machiavelli (The Prince) would thoroughly agree assassination is the winning strategy. This is all very well and good when you're #1. When the shoe is on the other foot, it may not feel so fun.
Rule of Law = 0, Rule of Jungle = 1
It took America ten years to find bin Laden. But it could be worse - it took Serbia sixteen years to find Ratko Mladic.
Except that neither Serbian President Boris Tadic nor Prime Minister Mirko Cvetkovic are ultra-nationalists. Indeed, they defeated the nationalist government to get into power.
Since his indictment in 1995, Mladic lived almost openly in Belgrade until 2000 when former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic was toppled. The ouster of his one-time mentor robbed Mladic of his untouchable status.
Even afterwards, though, Mladic hid under military protection, authorities in Serbia have admitted.
TenEightyOneSerbia undoubtedly knew where he was, but now they want Accession status they've had to hand him over. Don't forget that the man is a Nationalist hero... and there you have clear similarities between Serbia and Pakistan.
Any news on the newest South Park episode?
A new article by top investigative journalist Seymour Hersh.
Sourceless Hersh? The very same?
This story is compelling and I guess it can never be proven one way or the other, the White House won't change their story (in this term at least), the Pakistanis won't change theirs, and the Taliban won't change theirs.
That leaves an open playing field for fantasy writing. Hersh may have won some awards but he's also been described as "the most gullible investigative journalist I've ever encountered" (Schlessinger Jr), Amir Tahir has noted that "As soon as he has made an assertion he cites a 'source' to back it. In every case this is either an un-named former official or an unidentified secret document passed to Hersh in unknown circumstances... By my count Hersh has anonymous 'sources' inside 30 foreign governments and virtually every department of the U.S. government." and in a recent controversy he accused American troops of the sodomy of young boys.
The real miracle of this story is that people still print his rubbish, I think. He wouldn't last long on GTPlanet for sure
I don't think you had time to read the whole article before replying. But no matter.