Ovals VS Road Courses

  • Thread starter Sam48
  • 726 comments
  • 39,088 views

Which would you like to see more of, ovals or road courses?


  • Total voters
    549
A car's turning capabilities rely on how its suspension & tires are setup. Those same parts are challenged in drag racing.

Most race cars deal with in tires, longitidinal slip and lateral slip, in suspension front/rear weight transfer, left/right weight transfer and diagonal weight transfer, pitch centres, roll centres, etc etc etc. The chassis has to deal with roll inertia, pitch inertia, roll stiffness.

A drag racer sacrificies essentially half of those things to optimise the other half (lateral vs longitudinal). So its true that a drag racer doesn't push the "entire dynamics" of a car, however it does push certain dynamics well beyond what other cars are capable of because it can afford to be designed differently.
 
Why is every Nascar fan in here so obsessed with trying to convince the non-fans? Some people just don't like it and nothing will make them think otherwise, just accept that.

Who said it was a Nascar race? It's oval racing, stock cars...
Nascar is not the only thing going off here in February, there are late models, dirt tracking, ARCA... More than just the Major touring series on the big track.

Why are so many road course fans, so obsessed with not giving an inch on oval racing? ( I am a road racing fan...)

I'm willing to bet you've never been to a race, how can you be sure you don't like something without ever experiencing it in person? I'm just willing to make it happen provided some people would like to enjoy some 80* weather and experience a form of racing that is not native to their own country. How's that a bad thing?
 
Last edited:
Why is every Nascar fan in here so obsessed with trying to convince the non-fans? Some people just don't like it and nothing will make them think otherwise, just accept that.

The ones who dont like it are on this thread also.. maybe we'll start a nascar thread and if you dont like nascar then keep off the thread.
 
My point was that in drag racing in particular, not all of the elements of racing are present i.e cornering, braking, cornering while braking (i mean braking with disks and calipers - not popping a bit of embroidery out the back end), gear changing at the right time to maximise torque through a bend, exiting a bend at the optimum rpm, that sort of things. They're just not present.

Don't get me wrong I respect the massive power of the engines on these cars and the acceleration they can generate, but it realy is barn door engineering compared to the considerations an engineer has to take into account to design and set up a real racing car. As an engineer myself, I don't see them as being at the same level.

I don't think you understand the technology, and experience those guys have that make a car go straight. Meanwhile, every thing Isaac Newton discovered says that car should do anything but go straight.

What is so hard about making a butt ton of downforce so a car can go around turns fast?
 
My point was that in drag racing in particular, not all of the elements of racing are present i.e cornering, braking, cornering while braking (i mean braking with disks and calipers - not popping a bit of embroidery out the back end), gear changing at the right time to maximise torque through a bend, exiting a bend at the optimum rpm, that sort of things. They're just not present.

Don't get me wrong I respect the massive power of the engines on these cars and the acceleration they can generate, but it realy is barn door engineering compared to the considerations an engineer has to take into account to design and set up a real racing car. As an engineer myself, I don't see them as being at the same level.

You don't have any idea the amount of tuning that goes into any series in the NHRA. The top fuel cars have over 7000 horsepower running on nitromethane. If you set the clutch to engage .1 of a second too early, you've spun your tires, .1 of a second too late, and the race is lost. And the clutch isn't the only thing that matters, tire pressure, fuel injection percentages, and downforce all have to be just right. The hardest part about setting up the car is that they are only on the track for 4 seconds.
 
I don't think you understand the technology, and experience those guys have that make a car go straight. Meanwhile, every thing Isaac Newton discovered says that car should do anything but go straight.

What is so hard about making a butt ton of downforce so a car can go around turns fast?

Actually the stuff Isaac Newton says that a car will want to go in a straight line :P Its called inertia.

I can definately see the appeal of road racing from the "dynamics" perspective. Most race cars have to deal with pitch up, pitch down, roll one way and the other, diagonal roll, and all of those things either in steady state or in transient and everything in between.

The only thing a dragster has to do is a transient longitudinal acceleration. A "good" drag is one where only that occurs. Where as a good road race is one where the car is whipping its weight from wheel to wheel, holding down steady state cornering then flicking into quick transients, running itself back and forth all over the optimum slip angle graph. That's what's REQUIRED to get a good lap.

I think the point quickben brought up (possibly :P) is not this whole crap of "what's so hard about blah", as we all know a lot of skill and engineering goes into any form of racing, but rather the appeal of a race where the cars are using the full spectrum of vehicle dynamics. Opposed to one which is just trying to optimise 1 or 2 aspects of vehicle dynamics (which can be appealing in its own way of course).
 
Inertia-The tendency of a body to resist acceleration; the tendency of a body at rest to remain at rest or of a body in straight line motion to stay in motion in a straight line unless acted on by an outside force(maybe 6000-8000HP?).
 
My point was that in drag racing in particular, not all of the elements of racing are present i.e cornering, braking, cornering while braking (i mean braking with disks and calipers - not popping a bit of embroidery out the back end), gear changing at the right time to maximise torque through a bend, exiting a bend at the optimum rpm, that sort of things. They're just not present.

Don't get me wrong I respect the massive power of the engines on these cars and the acceleration they can generate, but it realy is barn door engineering compared to the considerations an engineer has to take into account to design and set up a real racing car. As an engineer myself, I don't see them as being at the same level.
Setting up 7,000Hp & being able to control it at 300Mph+ , nevermind the fact that those teams are always looking for ways just to knock .1 second off is barn door engineering?

Ok, you keep assuming that. :rolleyes:
 
LSX
I'm willing to bet you've never been to a race, how can you be sure you don't like something without ever experiencing it in person?

Of course I haven't, we don't have ovals here. You don't need to experience it in real life, you can judge it perfectly from watching it on tv. Ofcourse you can't judge the atmosphere and it's perfectly possible I'd have fun going to an oval race, but not because of the racing itself. I could have fun at an American Football game even but I still wouldn't like the sport.

SKNO1
The ones who dont like it are on this thread also.. maybe we'll start a nascar thread and if you dont like nascar then keep off the thread.

Then by all means do so, and I wouldn't enter that thread. But since this discussion is about Ovals VS Road Courses, that's not really relevant.
 
you can judge it perfectly from watching it on tv.

Sorry, but you can't. What you are saying is the eqiuvalent to watching the food network and saying "I can judge how that tastes just by watching it on TV".
 
right, so now this thread has got to the subject of drag racing. I suppose that's logical, on a personal scale of boring I'd have grand prix, then oval/nascar then drag racing. Personal scale. Would I like a go in a drag car? Hell yeah, that rush of acceleration has got to be out of this world. Would I like a go in a nascar? Well, yeah, again seat of the pants adrenaline rush but, to be honest, I'd rather have a go in a touring car or F1.

Thing is we're not talking about real-life. We're talking about a simulation and simulation can't give you that feeling of "oh I might die here" so the point is largely moot. Wasn't it NFS that had the drag strip part of the game? You know, the boring bit that was about as much fun to play as bass-fishing on the megadrive. Problem is, if you take the "oh I might die here" factor out of it entirely all you are left with is pressing the gear change button at the precise sweet spot. That's it with drag racing - tapping R2 occasionally.

Same idea with oval racing - my least favourite part of any GT game what has featured it - draft, draft, draft ... long boring, foregone conclusion overtake - wash, rinse repeat ad nauseum.

Now I've tried watching Nascar on teevee, just to see if I could get what all the fuss was about and I ended up figuring it was the same as Strictly come dancing or football - some really boring crap that only "the masses" really understand the appeal of. Like Britney Spears being no.1 - sure it's popular as hell but in terms of musical ability it has to rank in the high minus figures somewhere.

The more GT5 forces me to race round in circles and not actually drive the way I like driving to be simulated , in order to complete the single player game - the more I'll feel like I'm punishing myself rather than enjoying.

Nascar fans all seem hell bent on convincing us their sport is somehow enjoyable. Don't bother. One man's meat is another man's poison. Personally I find dumbed down racing for the masses to be a massive turn off and there's very little anyone can say to change my mind. Just Like I feel about Gymkhana or stamp collecting.

The OP here is a personal question - how many oval courses would you like in GT5? Personally - none, they suck like a gigawatt dyson with a turbo inside. But PD will put them in because it means increasing market share. Fine but be warned, it's a slippery slope. Once they've cornered the Clueless American white-trash market they'll have to find new and increasingly depressing ways to increase sales. Eventually we'll have two or three decent road circuits, half a dozen ovals, twenty drag strips and 150 accurately modeled car parks where max-power demos and showing off your ICE will be the order of the day. Cos, like, y'know - trying to make hardcore drum 'n' base sound really really loud is like a proper motorsport and really popular and who needs corners or even a road surface anyway, man?
 
Sorry, but you can't. What you are saying is the eqiuvalent to watching the food network and saying "I can judge how that tastes just by watching it on TV".

Of course you can. The only thing you're missing out on at home is the atmosphere. I'd still find it boring if you were there.

And fwiw, the guy didn't say drag racing involved barn door engineering. He said it was barn door engineering compared to that in F1. Which it is.
 
And fwiw, the guy didn't say drag racing involved barn door engineering. He said it was barn door engineering compared to that in F1. Which it is.

Compared to F1 pretty much everything is "barndoor engineering" frankly though, if it isn't broke why fix it.
 
Sorry, but you can't. What you are saying is the eqiuvalent to watching the food network and saying "I can judge how that tastes just by watching it on TV".

You can get a pretty good idea whether or not something is uninteresting by watching it on TV. I've never been to an F1 race but I'm fairly confident I find it boring to watch. I have been to a NASCAR car and I honestly find it worse then watching it on TV because I'm surround by a bunch of smelly, drunk people, it's hotter than hell, and it's louder the Spinal Tap's 11...and on top of that I find the racing extremely uninteresting.
 
I'm surround by a bunch of smelly, drunk people, it's hotter than hell, and it's louder the Spinal Tap's 11.

So you don't like going to any concerts or sporting events? Because that's pretty much what you just described.
 
So you don't like going to any concerts or sporting events? Because that's pretty much what you just described.

Nope, dislike those for the most part too. I have to really really really like the artist for me to go see them in concert or I have to get free tickets. With sporting events I'll only ever go if it's 100% free which means a Pistons game about once a year.

I do go to the symphony and small jazz concerts though as they are nothing like what I described.
 
Nascar fans all seem hell bent on convincing us their sport is somehow enjoyable. Don't bother. One man's meat is another man's poison.

40 cars racing at 200 mph door to dooris exciting and enjoyable. This is not the NFL vs soccer. This is racing.

P3nT4gR4m
Same idea with oval racing - my least favourite part of any GT game what has featured it - draft, draft, draft ... long boring, foregone conclusion overtake - wash, rinse repeat ad nauseum.

This sentence alone shows your knowledge of oval racing is extremely limited. Come to NASCAR 2003 online , try draft , draft , draft , wash, rince repeat and see how it works for you. There are plenty of drivers waiting to prove you very wrong very quickly.

I really dont get it. So many Europeans in this thread talking about how horrible oval racing is because its too simple and "dumbed" down for the masses especially for a more sophisticated society like themselve, yet their favorite sport is soccer, which is the simplist most easy to follow sport in the world. Why does there racing have to be complicated , but there sport can be ultra simple? Double standard

Then they want to paint NASCAR fans as white trash rednecks yet soccer hooligans can throw bags of urine on the field, salute hitler or hurl racial insults at black players.

Free game tickets to drug addicts! so supperior to drunk rednecks :rolleyes:




Its useless fellas. Most will never get oval racing Its like trying to convince some of the most shallow people in the world that not every good woman has to be a blonde and/or extremely pretty. They'll laugh at and turn down the average looking woman with glasses every time. As P3nT4gR4m said theres nothing you can say to change his/their mind.
 
As an engineer myself, I don't see them as being at the same level.

If you're an engineer (especially one familiar with any kind of competitive sport) you should realize that nothing about them is barn door engineering. One field may have "more" to do than another, but doing it isn't the challenge. The challenge is doing it better than anyone else.

Right now, I'm working on brakes for my team's FSAE car. The rear rotors on the last design shattered because they were not properly built and analyzed.

We used this as a temporary replacement

Brakebrag.jpg


A solid slab of metal. Does it work? Yes. Was it easy? Yes. Were we done. NO. That rotor is far heavier than it needs to be, it also doesn't really solve the design the issue, because it's still bolted to the hub as opposed to being a floating rotor. My task is to get those rotors as light as possible with still taking thermal and mechanical stress over and over. If everyone on the team just did things the simple way, we'd have a car 200 lbs overweight, and 200 lbs to heavy to compete at all. No matter how complex or simple something may be, competition is never easy.
 
I think, after 25 pages, it is obvious some Europeans are a little chapped that America gets it's favorite motorsport, as well as another American motorsport, and they don't like it. Yet, even though they moan page after page, they, the ones who hate ovals and anything related to ovals, have to pay for it. Not only in the monetary sense, but now they, the ones who would die for the name road course, have to read about our excitement and there is nothing left to do but call it boring and stupid.

:lol: I think it is time for the Boss...

:lol: and here is some European flavor...
 
Last edited:
First off, JoeyD, what motorsport do you like?

Nascars themselves are as old school as the tracks they drive on. They're still in the dark ages. oval shaped track, they don't have center lock wheels, they still have carby engines and only have a 4 speed gearbox.. it's like they never wanted to come out of the 60's.

Everywhere else around the world has state of the art racing circuits with technical left and right hand turns, hills that go up and down, huge pit crews with one man for each wheel, state of the art refueling devices, center lock wheels, fuel injected engines.

and then there's Nascar. Oh dear.

Thanks for describing what makes NASCAR so unique and thus interesting. It annoys me to no end how most of the world's motorsports look like Formula 1 copy cats in presentation and execution. People complain so much about the lug nuts, yet they say stock cars aren't "stock" enough. The double standard rears its head again.

So every motorsport that doesnt have 50 guys service a car in a pit stop that takes no skill and that takes just 5 seconds is garbage? Ill watch a few guys struggle to make time during a 15 second pitstop over 50 guys not having to rush changing the tires in 5 seconds.

If you put it in the hands of the circuit only people around here NASCAR would end up being nothing more then another garden variety regional touring car series like BTCC, DTM, Super GT, V8 super car etc. Basically another clone with no real personality or anything that differentiates itself from other motorsports.

quickben
I'll probably give the NASCAR cars a go in GT5, just not the oval tracks. We've had the test track in GT for years now and I can't remember the last time I considered going on it. I can't think of anything in the game more boring than driving flat out constantly with just a couple of "bends" to brake the monotony. I know there's more to it than that but, be honest, there's not much more to it is there ? For me, there's not much difference between oval racing and drag racing. Neither of them challenge the entire dyamic capabilities of a car and therefore neither of them hold much interest for me.

Only two tracks in NASCAR are flat out, and thats only because they use restrictor plates there that rob them of 400 horsepower, otherwise they'd have to lift even at Daytona. You lift more often at short track ovals then any road course in the world.

quickben
I like accelerating\braking, I like perfecting gear changes, I like left AND right turns, I like chicanes.

These aren't very well represented on an oval track.

Again, outside of the restricted superspeedways you have to accelerate and brake on the ovals. And, as I said earlier the short tracks require more frequent accelerating, throttle control, and braking then any roadcourse.

As for left and right hand turns, your average clockwise course is usually made up of 75% or more of right hand turns, leaving maybe just 4 or 5 left hand turns. All this crying so the course can have 4 or 5 corners that go a different direction.

As for chicanes, I think you know these things are nothing more then cheap ways to slow the cars down and offer no challenge.

Of course you will have the people who would rather race any trash road course then even the best of ovals. These people can be described as those who would take only the best looking of women no matter how crappy the personality or hygiene, but hey, they overlook these faults because shes pretty. However they want nothing to do with the mild mannered "average" looking woman who, if you get to know her, can be infinitely more interesting then the stupid blonde.

Well I'm with IsmokeGT. I hope PD has a 36 race NASCAR oval championship with full length 4 hour races and no B-spec allowed just to tick you guys off

Nobody is asking anyone to love oval racing, but it's certainly not garbage as many have made it out to be. I mean the idea people can be shown 3 wide finishes, all sorts of passing, big packs, closing racing and then they call it boring because there is no right hand turns or chicanes? I just have to think something must be wrong with their Madula Oblongata. What do they want NASCAR to do, make Daytona's backstretch chicane part of the NASCAR race? Would that suddenly make the racing more interesting? Or as one moron suggested run the Indy 500 on the roadcourse?

However I must refrain from being too harsh as not everyone has had the privledge to grow up with and understand every motorsport as I have.
 
Last edited:
First off, JoeyD, what motorsport do you like?

I've sort of covered this already, but I'll give a more detailed response. The number one motorsport I enjoy is autocross because you can take virtually any roadworthy car and compete. That right there makes it very enjoyable to do and to watch.

Past that I like rally racing at all levels from the amateur stuff that happens locally, to the WRC, to the endurance ones like the Paris-Dakar. I also like endurance racing like the American Le Mans Series as well, however watching it for the entire length isn't possible for me because I get extremely bored. I can also tolerate a touring car race from time to time but over the years it's gotten pretty awful. It will never be like the early and mid 90's.

There is also the Isle of Man TT and the Race of Champions, but they aren't series.

Also when I can find it, I like watching the MINI Challenge stuff just because it's racing versions of my street car out there doing their thing. It's not that exciting but it's kind of cool to watch when I can find it, and I can totally see other thinking it's very boring.

To keep on topic with the thread though I should explain that my racing tastes do not include ovals what-so-ever. Even amateur oval racing is boring to me. I think before any ovals or road course are added though PD needs to give us a parking lot in which we can edit our own auto cross courses.
 
Inertia-The tendency of a body to resist acceleration; the tendency of a body at rest to remain at rest or of a body in straight line motion to stay in motion in a straight line unless acted on by an outside force(maybe 6000-8000HP?).

Yeah, but that force comes from the rear to push the car forward. For the car to want to turn, it needs a lateral force. Engine power (which is not a force ;)) is a longitudinal phenomenon.

So for the car to want to go anything BUT in a straight line is if the longitudinal force either from the engine or the wheels is unbalanced enough to overcome inertia and any damping/spring forces which are attempting to correct the car.

In reality a car doesn't *want* to turn because of its inertia. Thats why race cars go to great lengths to lower CG to reduce weight transfer (weight transfer = bad) and reduce inertia (inertia = car not wanting to respond to an input), to reduce the car's tendancy to not want to turn.

Thats not to say a high powered dragster doesn't want to turn :P I'm just saying the natural order of the physics is for it not to want to turn, its just the way you design it and tune it is such that you are pushing the limits of the tolerances in which the unbalanced forces created can be kept in check.
 
Well I'm with IsmokeGT. I hope PD has a 36 race NASCAR oval championship with full length 4 hour races and no B-spec allowed just to tick you guys off

:lol: Oh man, I would die laughing.

For good measure throw in the All-Star and the Shootout. :lol:
 
Back