PmC - WeeK 165 - Closed

The theme explanation requires that there are three or more JGTC Cars in the photo. In that, the photo admits the theme and in that you are right. But then there are the theme Restrictions and Requirements, where it says the type of cars allowed in the photo (JGTC Cars), tracks, poll, and if Phototravel is or not allowed. We cannot only look at the theme explanation. There are Requirements that have to be met.
 
Last edited:
^That's about the perfect explanation.

I'm not trying to bring it back up, just to make sure that everyone fully understands.
 
And those requirement WERE met.

I'll argue to the end of the earth with you guys on this. so we'll have to agree to disagree.
 
Sorry, I explained wrongly on thing, but just corrected in my previous post.

Met and transgressed, because when in the allow list of cars, the only cars allowed are JGTC. Since there is a none JGTC car, it transgresses the theme, since ONLY JGTC cars are allowed. That is why it is a restriction part of the theme.

In the competitions, normally we have, the Theme title, that can be pretty much random, but it has everything to do with the theme, it gives an highlight about the theme itself.

Then, there is the explanation, where the theme choser explains the theme and what he wants to see on it. It also has some of the theme requirements.

Then, there are the restrictions, where there is a restriction in the car or type of cars for the theme, the tracks for it and the Photoshop rules, as well as informing about if phototravel is allowed or not and the poll size.

In this case, Only JGTC cars were allowed

I just want you to don’t have any doubts about this.
 
Might as well quit arguing. I know ole Tuppy here, and he isn't going to give up in a hundred thousand years.
 
Neither do I. :lol:

Tupac, if you have more doubts or want to discuss about this, please P.M. me. I just felt the need to explain this, since there may be actually some doubts about it, since, at first, I was with a doubt about it also, and, as Swiss, this was what I though:
I think the pace car is actually a nice addition & quite creative.
 
Last edited:
Now. Have we stopped having an argument with each other over my photo? I didn"t expect it to be this controversial! Hell, why are people siding with me? The general concensus is that i broke the rules, and i accept that. Thanks to the people who defended me, but the argument was futile, i took the picture off and said i'll do another one yesterday!!!
 
Now. Have we stopped having an argument with each other over my photo? I didn"t expect it to be this controversial! Hell, why are people siding with me? The general concensus is that i broke the rules, and i accept that. Thanks to the people who defended me, but the argument was futile, i took the picture off and said i'll do another one yesterday!!!

Aww man, you had my vote from the start, but since it's illegal, then you have to win it again.
 
That's Okay! I don't think I will end up entering this week. I just have that entry hanging over my head now, there is too many expectations for me to perform. May not enter until next week
 
I'll quit it here and now, but like Skyline said, i won't be changing what I think. I'll just STFU about it.

Senamic: No pressure. it's the expectation of making a better entry that pushes us to try new ways of taking shots and making photos.
 
Senamic: No pressure. it's the expectation of making a better entry that pushes us to try new ways of taking shots and making photos.

Thanks for the kind words! I just think that I may as well treat this week how McLaren treated the last two Grand Prix, that is, treat it as damage control. Hmmm... You all seem to be using JGTC500s... I got an IDEA!!! It will probably suck, but it will be against the grain.
 
And those requirement WERE met.

I'll argue to the end of the earth with you guys on this. so we'll have to agree to disagree.

The 'cars' bit has ALWAYS meant which cars are allowed in the shot. It doesn't say 'JGTC and others', does it? No, it says 'JGTC'. The pace car is not JGTC. It's fairly simple really.
 
...moving on

THANK YOU!!!! Many of us, including myself, have suggested we drop it! You guys won, both sides put up a good case, but the prosecution's case was superior! CAN WE PLEASE MOVE ON? I REMOVED THE STUPID PICTURE A FAIR TIME AGO! A PAGE OF DISCUSSION, IN FACT!
 
Now. Have we stopped having an argument with each other over my photo? I didn"t expect it to be this controversial! Hell, why are people siding with me? The general concensus is that i broke the rules, and i accept that. Thanks to the people who defended me, but the argument was futile, i took the picture off and said i'll do another one yesterday!!!

THANK YOU!!!! Many of us, including myself, have suggested we drop it! You guys won, both sides put up a good case, but the prosecution's case was superior! CAN WE PLEASE MOVE ON? I REMOVED THE STUPID PICTURE A FAIR TIME AGO! A PAGE OF DISCUSSION, IN FACT!

We're just trying to make sure that Tupac understands why it is illegal.
 
Is my entry allowed or not? I submitted it after the deadline but I could only take the shot today because I've been banned from my PS3 but my parents went out today so I got on it quickly.
 
Awesome entry, Swiss Legend! The background, the cars, everything just screams perfection!
 
I like the front NSX being a bit blurred, it gives a little more action to the whole thing ;) Good job, Swissi :P
 
Back