- 937
- New York
- Intensegamer101
That depends. Will they make GTS a full game when it's ready? Without buying a separate copy?
Not sure why anyone would commit to a purchase of any product they know next to nothing about, but each to their own.
Why not. This is not their first game and most users following it know pretty much what to expect. Moreover it is not annualised series like F1 or fifa where I guess many user skip 1year as that is not enough time to bring in proper changes to the game.
We know next to nothing about the game, and given their recent history re-using ancient assets (sound and graphics), dumbing the game down, and taking forever to release promised content, I would have thought more people would at least wait for some info on the game before blindly committing to buying it, but like I said, each to their own.
There are both sides of the coins. Sure some people are put off by their last games and probably not interested but there are many who are interested as well. As I said it will be 3years by the time GTS will be released and moreover it is on a new platform. So there will be some changes in development on a new console not only in gfx rendering but other areas too
Sure they've been developing it for three years, and it's on a new platform, but that doesn't guarantee they'll make it a better game, it just guarantees they have a better machine to work with. They managed to make GT5 and 6 pretty bad despite the enormous performance leap the PS3 offered over the PS2. Those games weren't bad because of the PS3's limitations, they were bad because of sketchy design choices like prioritising graphics over sounds, removing endurances in GT6, the increased amount of gimmicky mini games, working on pointless features like the gps data visualiser, stuffing up the physics in GT6, and completely ignoring the career mode, making it basically a smaller version of every other GT game career mode.
Oh and leaving PS2 assets in was also a poor desicion, and one they actually said they're planning to do again on PS4...
There was a more than three year gap between GT5 and GT6, two titles on the same platform, and 6 was only a development of the GT5 engine, so it should have been made a hell of a lot better in three years, and yet it was somehow made significantly worse. The physics were worse, there were more bugs, the AI was somehow made worse, the game was much easier and shorter, and they removed features. The online was better, but was ridiculously unstable.
So considering the best upgrade they could come up with over GT5 in three years was GT6, there is absolutely no guarantee that three years will be long enough to make GTS a lot better than GT6, despite the hardware improvement.
There are people actually waiting to get a PS4 until GTS comes out.Edit...... just a quick note about the wording of the poll, what would be the point of buying GTS if you didn't have a PS4?
Good point well made Mike. Although you have made me drop into a deep depression
Cheers, Zo.
Sure they've been developing it for three years, and it's on a new platform, but that doesn't guarantee they'll make it a better game, it just guarantees they have a better machine to work with. They managed to make GT5 and 6 pretty bad despite the enormous performance leap the PS3 offered over the PS2. Those games weren't bad because of the PS3's limitations, they were bad because of sketchy design choices like prioritising graphics over sounds, removing endurances in GT6, the increased amount of gimmicky mini games, working on pointless features like the gps data visualiser, stuffing up the physics in GT6, and completely ignoring the career mode, making it basically a smaller version of every other GT game career mode.
Oh and leaving PS2 assets in was also a poor desicion, and one they actually said they're planning to do again on PS4...
There was a more than three year gap between GT5 and GT6, two titles on the same platform, and 6 was only a development of the GT5 engine, so it should have been made a hell of a lot better in three years, and yet it was somehow made significantly worse. The physics were worse, there were more bugs, the AI was somehow made worse, the game was much easier and shorter, and they removed features. The online was better, but was ridiculously unstable.
So considering the best upgrade they could come up with over GT5 in three years was GT6, there is absolutely no guarantee that three years will be long enough to make GTS a lot better than GT6, despite the hardware improvement.
Edit: I do of course hope that GTS is the massive leap forward for the series we've all been waiting for for over five years now, but I'll just continue to keep my expectations in check considering their recent history taking forever to make sub par games. I'll be taking the same approach to Pcars 2 after the Pcars 1 hype train failed to deliver much.
GT6 has much better physics than GT5 and is a better game though GT5 had many good things as well. But anyways no need to derail this thread like pretty much every thread in this site. I am sure there are countless such topics here. Regarding GTS. I was just giving an example lol. Many people including me are looking forward to it and know what to expect from the game.
Haha I totally agree, and if you take a look at the poll, that right there is the reason why PD don't need to (and probaby won't) really improve their game much. They can just keep doing the same thing every time, over hype, under deliver, and blind fans will gobble it up every time. How many people have committed to buying GTS without knowing anything about it? It's insanity!
You should have posted this instead. It would be just as relevant:
Ahh, Is that the source you base most of your 'Logic' and assumptions off of?You should have posted this instead. It would be just as relevant:
So basically...
GT6 has much better physics than GT5 and is a better game though GT5 had many good things as well. But anyways no need to derail this thread like pretty much every thread in this site. I am sure there are countless such topics here. Regarding GTS. I was just giving an example lol. Many people including me are looking forward to it and know what to expect from the game.
GT6's physics weren't better, they were completely backwards from reality and most of the settings either did nothing, or did the opposite of what they would have in real life. At least the settings kind of worked in GT5. Other than the online setup, I can't think of anything significant that GT6 does better than GT5, and I certainly wouldn't consider it a better game. GT6 felt like a pared down version of GT5 that was made significantly easier and more casual.
What was your example? You were just suggesting that the game will be good enough to warrant committing to buying it a whole year before it comes out, despite knowing nothing at all about it, based on the sole fact that it will have taken 3 years to make. I reminded you that GT6 took 3 years to make, despite using the same engine as GT5, and being on the same platform, and it was, according to most, significantly worse than GT5. Selling less than half the amount of copies reflects how poor it was compared to GT5.
I'll also remind you that you started this back and forth by quoting my first post and taking the conversation in this direction. If you wish to stop the conversation, you don't need to keep quoting me, but don't quote my post, and then tell me not to "derail this thread", just so you can have the last say lol. Everything I've said is relevant to the topic of whether I, as a PS4 owner, will commit to buying a game a year before it comes out.
I think you're in the minority with that view. Most of the reviews for GT6 I read praised the handling model and said it was an improvement on GT5.
It must be true if it said so in a review...
Being in the minority is something normal,not everyone has enough knowledge to evaluate the physics of one gameI think you're in the minority with that view. Most of the reviews for GT6 I read praised the handling model and said it was an improvement on GT5.
I'm not saying it's true.