Formula1269
(Banned)
- 426
The GOP is slowly becoming irrelevant and they're now worried that Trump is hurting their image.
Eventually the air will go out of Trump's ballooning campaign sails
You mean the part that controls the majority of your states, the congress and the senate? That GOP?The GOP is slowly becoming irrelevant and they're now worried that Trump is hurting their image.
remember Bengahzi?
Just wow, this womanitis clearly more economically clueless than Obama...if anything, every right-thinking economist will be having a field day with Clinton's cluelessness.
...are you unable to do anything beyond vomiting up the rhetoric that's been poured into your gullet by Fox News and the like?
Pretty sure you meant "yes".That's quite some image, but it works for me. I'd go on to hazard a guess at the answer being "no".
Pretty sure you meant "yes".
Trump is leading comfortably in the polls.
I think that the ability to add polls to existing threads is a premium feature, otherwise I would have already done so.@Sanji Himura
I came here to create a voting thread asking people who i should be voting for based on the highest choice from this forum.
Should i create such a thread ?
Or
Can i ask you if i can piggy back on yours? If so. Would you mind changing your OP and allow voting?
Essentially, members would be voting for me to vote...
What do you think?
Right now, i have no idea who i should and would vote for....
I am looking for to vote but i want to make the "right" choice.... And by that i mean the correct choice... Dont we alll?
Can you help?
The other reason i ask is because i really didnt feel like having two similar threads going on around here and didnt want to run against you....
Edit: Is that a good idea?
If that baboon actually wins all hope for humanity is lost.Trump is leading comfortably in the polls.
Populism is gonna win the vote.
This might be a good place to start. http://www.ontheissues.org/default.htm@Sanji Himura
I came here to create a voting thread asking people who i should be voting for based on the highest choice from this forum.
Should i create such a thread ?
Or
Can i ask you if i can piggy back on yours? If so. Would you mind changing your OP and allow voting?
Essentially, members would be voting for me to vote...
What do you think?
Right now, i have no idea who i should and would vote for....
I am looking for to vote but i want to make the "right" choice.... And by that i mean the correct choice... Dont we alll?
Can you help?
The other reason i ask is because i really didnt feel like having two similar threads going on around here and didnt want to run against you....
Edit: Is that a good idea?
I think that the only reason why a poll here might be necessary in the UK rather than the US is because Brits don't always vote for a candidate, they vote by what party would represent them in Parliament on a national level. The last election in GB had a 47% misrepresentation error on how parliament divided its seats. While the US has the House of Representatives that are elected on a local level, and the Electorial college (to be the ultimate check for fraud; divided up by how many representatives a state actually sends to DC,) Britain has no such check written into its system of government. Local elections send one MP to parliament and they elect the Prime Minister.@CTznOfTime
The only reason to want to know who most people think you should vote for is if you just want to vote for the winner.
That isn't how elections should work. Take the time to look through the candidate's policy points, if they already have served in an office (most have for president) then look at their voting record, as what they say and what they do might be very different.
I make my decision after the sample ballots become available on my state Secretary of State's Web site. I look at my choices and research anyone I am not already familiar with.
I think that the only reason why a poll here might be necessary in the UK rather than the US is because Brits don't always vote for a candidate, they vote by what party would represent them in Parliament on a national level. The last election in GB had a 47% misrepresentation error on how parliament divided its seats. While the US has the House of Representatives that are elected on a local level, and the Electorial college (to be the ultimate check for fraud; divided up by how many representatives a state actually sends to DC,) Britain has no such check written into its system of government. Local elections send one MP to parliament and they elect the Prime Minister.
I was referring to the MPs electing a Prime Minister. Still wrong, but I wanted to be clear.we do not elect Prime Ministers or ruling parties, ever.
#16 for the GOP side: The Governor of Ohio. http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-pn-kasich-2016-20150721-story.html
The list is missing George Pataki then...He's on the OP. I just spelt his name wrong.
Yes, or they can win as an independent because they draw votes from both parties.I don't know if this was answered before, but if the GOP election turns ugly, and a candidate decides (after he/she loses the vote) he/she still wants to run, can said candidate run as an independent, and therefore (if candidate is popular) pretty much hand the victory to the Hilldog?
During his re-election bid in 2006, he lost the Democratic Party primary election but won re-election in the general election as a third party candidate under the "Connecticut for Lieberman" party label. Lieberman himself was never a member of that party, but instead remained a registered Democrat while he ran.
In order to win, the Rs must gather all their warring factions under one tent.I don't know if this was answered before, but if the GOP election turns ugly, and a candidate decides (after he/she loses the vote) he/she still wants to run, can said candidate run as an independent, and therefore (if candidate is popular) pretty much hand the victory to the Hilldog?