The Clinton Foundation and Hillary For America are not the same thing. Do you have any corroboration that the former is illegally funneling money to the latter?
How's a report from the Middle East instead that was quickly deleted quoting Prince Mohammed as saying,
“Saudi Arabia always has sponsored both Republican and Democratic Party of America and in
America current election also provide with full enthusiasm 20 percent of the cost of Hillary Clinton’s election even though some events in the country don’t have a positive look to support the king of a woman (sic) for presidency,”
The media right now is ignoring the story about how Trump's people were approached with a $2 million donation from a foreigner b/c of the Veritas videos. And maybe, rightly so, seeing as $2 million that was never accepted is a bit of a drop compared to numerous allegations of Hillary accepting donations from various foreign parties, hence the current term, "Pay to Play" against her.
This is exactly the problem. The "The Clintons are bad, m'kay" narrative is now so widely accepted that, despite the fact at most of their "scandals" have never moved past the realm of conspiracy theory and innuendo, we're all supposed to just accept accusations against them as true by default.
Talk of scandal does not equal real scandal. I don't care how much someone is disliked, accusations still need to be proven.
As if all of the recent news about Trump have been nothing more than accusations as well, yet liberals slurp the Kool-Aid and push that narrative that he's a woman-hating, sexual prowler. The only evidence of the man is that he spoke like a jackass claiming to just grab women by the genitals; the rest of these women claiming he touched them have yet to do nothing more than accuse him. What was your wording? Ah, "I don't care how much someone is disliked, accusations still need to be proven".
Meanwhile, you've got video evidence of Hillary's team getting involved illegally with a group that admits on tape that they purposely disrupt rallies & follow Trump around. Bob Creamer even drops Hillary's name in the video, not once, but twice. The DNC is not allowed to be involved, but they have a staffer on tape claiming whilst they can not accept credit for the mascot idea, they are still involved with it. Of course, the DNC/Hillary claim they have no knowledge, or CNN likes to act like the videos are doctored, but neither will answer why Foval was fired or Creamer resigned if they've done nothing wrong & never "acted" on their claims.
You want to talk about a real scandal, there's 1 for you, and that's just about them trying to influence voters. Nevermind the main scandal being the e-mails that show questionable discussions taking place, Benghazi, the DNC blocking out Bernie, or after all that, the FBI Director recommending no charges against Hillary when others have been prosecuted for less.
These accusations are as close to being proven as they get, the issue is getting anyone to actually hold her accountable. And that's another scandal in itself.
Trump is a loud mouth buffoon whose only major crime from the media, is saying a lot of stupid things. Hillary on other hand, has already done a lot of stupid things.