It took a large hit because 40,500 miles on a 3 year old Cayman R is a lot. On the other end of the spectrum, is a 2012 with 13,300 miles retailing for $90,000 on DuPont. Considering they only built 563 Rs for the US market (624 for the N. American marker) & there's almost literally zero on the market, they will retain their value due to their rarity.This is far from an adequate sample size, but there is 1 Cayman R on ebay for $53k buy it now with 40,000 miles. For comparison, the as-new base MSRP in 2012 was $67,000. The one on ebay was likely $75k or more due to its options. Nearly $25,000 in 3 years is a pretty big hit. Hopefully (for me anyways) the GT4 will take a similar dive.
Unfortunately, I find the first generation Cayman far too ugly to ever consider.
I don't know if it'll gain that much value. The 4.0 is worth a lot, but it was already worth a crazy amount new. The only Porsche I've seen close to holding value like the FGT is the appropriate CGT.
The crazy thing is that some of the rarer 911s sell for more than some of the higher mileage CGTs....which is insane to me.
This is true. I was referring more to the time frame between end of production & where the values are now; a couple FGTs shot up to $300,000 in just 5 years of leaving production & outside of Ferraris, the CGT is closest I have seen in my lifetime retain such value in less than 10 years of leaving production. I should have elaborated on that instead of a broad statement including all-time.Until recently, the CGT has been a bargain.
18 months ago, you could pick up a good CGT for £350k (high milers were below £300k)... when a decent '73 RS was fetching £500k. They have shot up in value following the other limited run models and are now c.£550k, but still great value compared to the £495k JZM are asking for a low mileage 964 Turbo S lightweight
I think JZM sold a 4.0RS in PTS Mexico Blue for £395k late last year... silly money.
You liar, you.Nope, not interested. Still prefer the 991 GTS over this car. 💡
Of course, that's 600 cars altogether (where as the CGT had double that), but pretty crazy for 2 examples to nearly double in value at 4 years old. The RS line altogether seems to be a more sound investment for a Porsche. I see a couple Mk. I GT3 RS '04s asking $230,000+ on the market.
Now we just need RUF to get their mitts on it.
Probably but the front suspension of the GT4 is of the 991 GT3 and that is a very good baseline to start from when making a "Cayman" Ruf.I doubt RUF need to use the GT4 as a base given they pretty much strip everything off and start again anyway. A base Caymen would be a cheaper and more effective starting point!
My 18 month comment in my previous post was a bit wide of the mark! I was re-reading a car magazine earlier this week from September last year. There was a CGT for sale in the classifieds at £300k (dealer, decent spec, c.20k miles). The cheapest one I can find 7 months later is £550k
I doubt RUF need to use the GT4 as a base given they pretty much strip everything off and start again anyway. A base Caymen would be a cheaper and more effective starting point!
While I'm sure it's a good baseline, Stotty is right; they're going to use whatever they want & customers can always option for something beyond if they like.Probably but the front suspension of the GT4 is of the 991 GT3 and that is a very good baseline to start from when making a "Cayman" Ruf.
A racing version might be on the way:
Cayman > 911
In terms of looks, the 911 just doesn't even compare.The mid engined Porsche's are fantastic cars to drive, but a 911 is a 911... they just FEEL so different to anything else on the road, and it's this that makes them special to drive, no matter what the performance numbers or lap times say.
A racing version might be on the way:
I still prefer the Cayman.The Caymen is nice, especially the GT4, but I'll just leave this here... and the 991 is nowhere near the best looking 911 of all time.
![]()
I still prefer the Cayman.