PRAIANO'S TUNES : SETTINGS FOR GT7

  • Thread starter praiano63
  • 13,028 comments
  • 14,125,998 views
World circuits - Trial mountain - World touring car 900 or clicking on the green box on the top right when you enter the world circuits (weekly challanges)

put racing medium tyres
 
Ferrari F40 '92 - 800PP - Racing Soft Tires - SPA / All track - Swap - 1.34

SWAP ENGINE - F140B Ferrari Enzo
Rims '18
Rim Width Wide
Parts:
Rear A
Wing A

Not performant anymore on Sardenia due to consumption. I love it on SPA or any technical track full power. I race it with my Porsche GT3 RS (991) '16 ghost on several track and the pace is the same.
The car is a bit too wild on Nordschleife , at least for me , the driving line is not so steady . Perfect a better driver with a better wheel can do well there.

View attachment 1260656View attachment 1260657View attachment 1260658View attachment 1260659



>((((°>°°°°°°

Enjoy your drive.
Also works great on the non-swapped cars. I set the top gear to 315, first gear to 122. The max rear aero is now 300 with the latest update. Thanks.
 
I did it with the Audi RS 5 Turbo DTM, RH tires, FM 2, Pit after 5 laps, did not change tires only add fuel. Used praiano's tune.

 
Last edited:
I did it in 17 mins with the Mazda vgt, first with 16 sec from the second and hard game difficulty. The LM55 it's a rocket! Sport medium tires, fuel map 3 and pit at lap 7. No drive aids
 
Last edited:
Mazda RX8 Spirit R '12 - 700PP - Racing Hard tires - All Track - SWAP -1.41
Gran Turismo® 7_20240111151211.jpg
 
Porsche GT3 RS (991) '16 - 700 PP - Racing Hard tires - All Track - SWAP - 1.35

SWAP ENGINE: M97/80-911 (Porsche 911 991 RSR ‘17)

Wide Body
Rims up to you - Rim Width Wide - Offset Wide
Front A
Side A
Rear Standard
Wing A

The problem with this car is the lack of power and top speed of this swap engine. So i didn't do a suspension setting , the original is perfect and save almost 10 PP. You can add power instead , the economy of the SWAP help to run ECO 1 on Le Mans and do lap under 4 minutes. Stock gearbox , i love it , you can use the custom also , same PP.

View attachment 1270251View attachment 1270252View attachment 1270253



>((((°>°°°°°°
Enjoy your drive.
Amazing car!
 
Anyone have any ideas on the 720pp clubman cup plus on X? I got supras blowing by me while I’m going 230 in my Veyron..
There's a thread with some recommendations:

https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...route-x-is-that-possible.423989/post-14133059

As stated in there, I personally used the tune below, on SS tyres to meet the criteria, but many cars can do it:

Nissan Silvia Q's (S13) '88 - MAXED - Racing Tires - Route X - SWAP LS7 BRZ - 1.34

This car can't do anything else , perhaps drift but i'm not a specialist.
For speed yes , it go 460kmh 285 mph , all this staying stable , this is the most difficult . I'm not of a top speed specialist too , but i think it's a good base.

Optional for who want to drive this car on other track like Le Mans , set the ride height at max 185/185 and use Racing soft. You'll not do more than 1 lap anyway because of gas. on the 700PP event.

Wide car
Rims up to you
Width wide
Offfset Wide
Front B - Side B - Rear B - Wing B

View attachment 1168350View attachment 1168351

1- set auto speed at the minimum 300kmh
2-set the final gear to 3.000
3- set each gear ratio beginning from the last gear to first gear in this order.


View attachment 1168352View attachment 1168353


>((((°>°°°°°°

Enjoy your drive.
 
Lamborghini Miura P400 Bertone '67 - 600PP - Sport Hard Tires - Tokyo Rain event - 1.39

Wide Car
Rims (Up to you)
Rims Width Wide - Offset Wide
Wing Custom

In my opinion the best option for this event , speed x driving pleasure x easy to manage x wonderfull drivable cockpit view and sound.

View attachment 1295714View attachment 1295715View attachment 1295716View attachment 1295717
View attachment 1250805
View attachment 1207606




>((((°>°°°°°°
Enjoy your drive.
After many tries with various cars I had my first "legit" win in tokyo with this car yesterday (had a win previously with a Ford Focus that required no pit stop and felt like cheating a bit).

After two atrocious laps where i hitted a lot of walls, I learned to dive more into turns (had an impression of understeer but it was my fault) and brake in a better timing and finally lapped around 2.10-2.11 and succeeded, I learned a lot as a newbie during this race.

Thank you for this tune Master P !
 
Any suggestion for the new weekly challange, wtc 900 at trial mountain? Maybe the Valkyrie should be good, but I don't know its fuel consumption, it's a 10 laps race
You can use one of the Group C cars like 787B, use a "MAXED" tune or even a 800PP tune from Praiano then tweak downforce to your liking and to stay under 900PP.

The hybrid protos like R18, 919 etc. aren't too bad at 900PP either.
 
You can use one of the Group C cars like 787B, use a "MAXED" tune or even a 800PP tune from Praiano then tweak downforce to your liking and to stay under 900PP.

The hybrid protos like R18, 919 etc. aren't too bad at 900PP either.
I placed third with the Mazda 787B. Fantastic acceleration but top speed limited. Placed first with the Nissan GT-R Nismo GT500 16 with RM tires and FM 2 until pit then FM 1. Look for the maxed tune on the first page.
 
I placed third with the Mazda 787B. Fantastic acceleration but top speed limited. Placed first with the Nissan GT-R Nismo GT500 16 with RM tires and FM 2 until pit then FM 1. Look for the maxed tune on the first page.
Really? The Mazda has a bigger tank than the Gr.2 cars and is crazy fast at 900PP... This Nissan is indeed a good choice, though.
 
Really? The Mazda has a bigger tank than the Gr.2 cars and is crazy fast at 900PP... This Nissan is indeed a good choice, though.
Yes. Maybe because I am just mediocre driver. The Mazda hit the rev limit early on the long straight. Made it hard to close time on the leaders which were both Nismo GT500s. Maybe longer gearing would fix. Pitted once both cars. Love that Mazda acceleration though.
 
Yes. Maybe because I am just mediocre driver. The Mazda hit the rev limit early on the long straight. Made it hard to close time on the leaders which were both Nismo GT500s. Maybe longer gearing would fix. Pitted once both cars. Love that Mazda acceleration though.
Just go into final drive on the tranny and lower it.Do a time trial on the track and set your final drive on the longest straight.Very easy to do.Good luck!
 
Yes. Maybe because I am just mediocre driver. The Mazda hit the rev limit early on the long straight. Made it hard to close time on the leaders which were both Nismo GT500s. Maybe longer gearing would fix. Pitted once both cars. Love that Mazda acceleration though.

Not mediocre. You won with a worse car than the 787B. But all the '16 Gr.2 cars are good choices. I'm partial to the Honda myself but I also enjoy the others.

B80
My car with seemingly same settings, upgrades etc is coming in 730pp... to get it down to 700, I have to reduce ecu to 70 and power restrictor quite far down. So bhp, torque are way below yours.

Not sure what's going on as I've gone over it several times...but as no one ekse has mentioned it, assume something my end!
Are you installing rear diffuser? Maybe that's the reason.
 
Last edited:
Not mediocre. You won with a worse car than the 787B. But all the '16 Gr.2 cars are good choices. I'm partial to the Honda myself but I also enjoy the others.


Are you installing rear diffuser? Maybe that's the reason.
Coukd be. But it says rear a and then custom wing?!
So I installed both.
 
B80
Coukd be. But it says rear a and then custom wing?!
So I installed both.
Diffuser itself shouldnt cause a different pp value as installing it only changes/increases the range for the aero setup.
As long as the aero setup is identical so should be the pp value (considering no other change).
 
McLaren F1 '94 - 700PP - Racing Hard Tires - All track - 1.41

Wide car
Rims 19"
Width wide
Offfset Wide
Front B - Side A - Wing Custom

NO NEED OF ENGINE TUNING . MY MISTAKE.

View attachment 1311453View attachment 1311454View attachment 1311455View attachment 1311456


>((((°>°°°°°°

Enjoy your drive.

I'm back after 6 weeks away from my rig! What a beautiful drive the F1 is with your tune. Superb on Nordschleife. And as always, a great cockpit view in this car.

I assumed that all we need to do is not install the engine tuning parts and have the ECU higher than your 72 so that the PP is 700? Out of interest; how did you manage to make such a mistake (adding engine tuning parts) to a car that is so expensive?!?! :lol:

Looking forward to working my way through all the other tunes you've posted in the last 6 weeks. What a shame to hear about yout PSVR tech hassles. Oh well - another few weeks isn't the end of the world. Will hopefully be worth it in the end. interested to hear how you go with the motion sickness. I was super nauseus with PSVR1. 90 seconds of GT Sport would leave me sick for 3 hours. So I sold it after a few days. Would like to try PSVR2. When I can afford it, I'll buy one......and then sell it if/when I get the motion sickness.;)
 
Last edited:
B80
My car with seemingly same settings, upgrades etc is coming in 730pp... to get it down to 700, I have to reduce ecu to 70 and power restrictor quite far down. So bhp, torque are way below yours.

Not sure what's going on as I've gone over it several times...but as no one ekse has mentioned it, assume something my end!
hi ,there was a previous tuning of this car from 1 year ( update GT7 1.27 ) that as weight reduction AND turbo ;
i have the same issue, so I add 200 ballast and reduce power to 91 and ECU to 85
;)
 
Check and see if you have weight reduction.

Yes I do mate. As the link takes you to tune that has screenshots with weight reduction 3 and rigidity. So I copied that.

It's exactly as laid out in tge description abd screenshots for the link posted. Hence my confusion!

No doubt I'm being a bit spoon fed here, but wanted to ensure I had it setup as the master intended. As I'm useless with tuning:D
 
Last edited:
B80
My car with seemingly same settings, upgrades etc is coming in 730pp... to get it down to 700, I have to reduce ecu to 70 and power restrictor quite far down. So bhp, torque are way below yours.

Not sure what's going on as I've gone over it several times...but as no one ekse has mentioned it, assume something my end!
I just set this tune up, and it came out perfectly at 699.99 as per the spec sheet. Not sure what the issue is that you're having, but I've seen GT7 glitch every once in a while with the PP numbers, just not usually by that much

BTW, @praiano63 , where did you get that livery? It's nice.
 
B80
Yes I do mate. As the link takes you to tune that has screenshots with weight reduction 3 and rigidity. So I copied that.

It's exactly as laid out in tge description abd screenshots for the link posted. Hence my confusion!

No doubt I'm being a bit spoon fed here, but wanted to ensure I had it setup as the master intended. As I'm useless with tuning:D
Wait a minute, the sheet I used has no weight reduction and no engine tuning. This is his post from a couple days ago

 
B80
Yes I do mate. As the link takes you to tune that has screenshots with weight reduction 3 and rigidity. So I copied that.

It's exactly as laid out in tge description abd screenshots for the link posted. Hence my confusion!

No doubt I'm being a bit spoon fed here, but wanted to ensure I had it setup as the master intended. As I'm useless with tuning:D
I had to buy another car no weight reductions or rigidity used on new tune
 

Latest Posts

Back