- 132
- United Kingdom
Where are they previewed?Any suggestion for the new weekly challange, wtc 900 at trial mountain? Maybe the Valkyrie should be good, but I don't know its fuel consumption, it's a 10 laps race
Where are they previewed?Any suggestion for the new weekly challange, wtc 900 at trial mountain? Maybe the Valkyrie should be good, but I don't know its fuel consumption, it's a 10 laps race
World circuits - Trial mountain - World touring car 900 or clicking on the green box on the top right when you enter the world circuits (weekly challanges)Where are they previewed?
World circuits - Trial mountain - World touring car 900 or clicking on the green box on the top right when you enter the world circuits (weekly challanges)
Also works great on the non-swapped cars. I set the top gear to 315, first gear to 122. The max rear aero is now 300 with the latest update. Thanks.Ferrari F40 '92 - 800PP - Racing Soft Tires - SPA / All track - Swap - 1.34
SWAP ENGINE - F140B Ferrari Enzo
Rims '18
Rim Width Wide
Parts:
Rear A
Wing A
Not performant anymore on Sardenia due to consumption. I love it on SPA or any technical track full power. I race it with my Porsche GT3 RS (991) '16 ghost on several track and the pace is the same.
The car is a bit too wild on Nordschleife , at least for me , the driving line is not so steady . Perfect a better driver with a better wheel can do well there.
View attachment 1260656View attachment 1260657View attachment 1260658View attachment 1260659
>((((°>°°°°°°
Enjoy your drive.
Amazing car!Porsche GT3 RS (991) '16 - 700 PP - Racing Hard tires - All Track - SWAP - 1.35SWAP ENGINE: M97/80-911 (Porsche 911 991 RSR ‘17)
Wide Body
Rims up to you - Rim Width Wide - Offset Wide
Front A
Side A
Rear Standard
Wing A
The problem with this car is the lack of power and top speed of this swap engine. So i didn't do a suspension setting , the original is perfect and save almost 10 PP. You can add power instead , the economy of the SWAP help to run ECO 1 on Le Mans and do lap under 4 minutes. Stock gearbox , i love it , you can use the custom also , same PP.
View attachment 1270251View attachment 1270252View attachment 1270253
>((((°>°°°°°°
Enjoy your drive.
Same pace with Alpine VGT '17 - 950PP - Racing Soft Tires - All Track - 1.41 using Racing hard .I did it in 17 mins with the Mazda vgt, first with 16 sec from the second and hard game difficulty. The LM55 it's a rocket! Sport medium tires, fuel map 3 and pit at lap 7. No drive aids
There's a thread with some recommendations:Anyone have any ideas on the 720pp clubman cup plus on X? I got supras blowing by me while I’m going 230 in my Veyron..
Nissan Silvia Q's (S13) '88 - MAXED - Racing Tires - Route X - SWAP LS7 BRZ - 1.34
This car can't do anything else , perhaps drift but i'm not a specialist.
For speed yes , it go 460kmh 285 mph , all this staying stable , this is the most difficult . I'm not of a top speed specialist too , but i think it's a good base.
Optional for who want to drive this car on other track like Le Mans , set the ride height at max 185/185 and use Racing soft. You'll not do more than 1 lap anyway because of gas. on the 700PP event.
Wide car
Rims up to you
Width wide
Offfset Wide
Front B - Side B - Rear B - Wing B
View attachment 1168350View attachment 1168351
1- set auto speed at the minimum 300kmh
2-set the final gear to 3.000
3- set each gear ratio beginning from the last gear to first gear in this order.
View attachment 1168352View attachment 1168353
>((((°>°°°°°°
Enjoy your drive.
After many tries with various cars I had my first "legit" win in tokyo with this car yesterday (had a win previously with a Ford Focus that required no pit stop and felt like cheating a bit).Lamborghini Miura P400 Bertone '67 - 600PP - Sport Hard Tires - Tokyo Rain event - 1.39
Wide Car
Rims (Up to you)
Rims Width Wide - Offset Wide
Wing Custom
In my opinion the best option for this event , speed x driving pleasure x easy to manage x wonderfull drivable cockpit view and sound.
View attachment 1295714View attachment 1295715View attachment 1295716View attachment 1295717
View attachment 1250805
View attachment 1207606
>((((°>°°°°°°
Enjoy your drive.
You can use one of the Group C cars like 787B, use a "MAXED" tune or even a 800PP tune from Praiano then tweak downforce to your liking and to stay under 900PP.Any suggestion for the new weekly challange, wtc 900 at trial mountain? Maybe the Valkyrie should be good, but I don't know its fuel consumption, it's a 10 laps race
I placed third with the Mazda 787B. Fantastic acceleration but top speed limited. Placed first with the Nissan GT-R Nismo GT500 16 with RM tires and FM 2 until pit then FM 1. Look for the maxed tune on the first page.You can use one of the Group C cars like 787B, use a "MAXED" tune or even a 800PP tune from Praiano then tweak downforce to your liking and to stay under 900PP.
The hybrid protos like R18, 919 etc. aren't too bad at 900PP either.
Really? The Mazda has a bigger tank than the Gr.2 cars and is crazy fast at 900PP... This Nissan is indeed a good choice, though.I placed third with the Mazda 787B. Fantastic acceleration but top speed limited. Placed first with the Nissan GT-R Nismo GT500 16 with RM tires and FM 2 until pit then FM 1. Look for the maxed tune on the first page.
Yes. Maybe because I am just mediocre driver. The Mazda hit the rev limit early on the long straight. Made it hard to close time on the leaders which were both Nismo GT500s. Maybe longer gearing would fix. Pitted once both cars. Love that Mazda acceleration though.Really? The Mazda has a bigger tank than the Gr.2 cars and is crazy fast at 900PP... This Nissan is indeed a good choice, though.
Just go into final drive on the tranny and lower it.Do a time trial on the track and set your final drive on the longest straight.Very easy to do.Good luck!Yes. Maybe because I am just mediocre driver. The Mazda hit the rev limit early on the long straight. Made it hard to close time on the leaders which were both Nismo GT500s. Maybe longer gearing would fix. Pitted once both cars. Love that Mazda acceleration though.
Yes. Maybe because I am just mediocre driver. The Mazda hit the rev limit early on the long straight. Made it hard to close time on the leaders which were both Nismo GT500s. Maybe longer gearing would fix. Pitted once both cars. Love that Mazda acceleration though.
Are you installing rear diffuser? Maybe that's the reason.My car with seemingly same settings, upgrades etc is coming in 730pp... to get it down to 700, I have to reduce ecu to 70 and power restrictor quite far down. So bhp, torque are way below yours.
Not sure what's going on as I've gone over it several times...but as no one ekse has mentioned it, assume something my end!
Coukd be. But it says rear a and then custom wing?!Not mediocre. You won with a worse car than the 787B. But all the '16 Gr.2 cars are good choices. I'm partial to the Honda myself but I also enjoy the others.
Are you installing rear diffuser? Maybe that's the reason.
Diffuser itself shouldnt cause a different pp value as installing it only changes/increases the range for the aero setup.Coukd be. But it says rear a and then custom wing?!
So I installed both.
McLaren F1 '94 - 700PP - Racing Hard Tires - All track - 1.41
Wide car
Rims 19"
Width wide
Offfset Wide
Front B - Side A - Wing Custom
NO NEED OF ENGINE TUNING . MY MISTAKE.
View attachment 1311453View attachment 1311454View attachment 1311455View attachment 1311456
>((((°>°°°°°°
Enjoy your drive.
Check and see if you have weight reduction.Coukd be. But it says rear a and then custom wing?!
So I installed both.
hi ,there was a previous tuning of this car from 1 year ( update GT7 1.27 ) that as weight reduction AND turbo ;My car with seemingly same settings, upgrades etc is coming in 730pp... to get it down to 700, I have to reduce ecu to 70 and power restrictor quite far down. So bhp, torque are way below yours.
Not sure what's going on as I've gone over it several times...but as no one ekse has mentioned it, assume something my end!
Check and see if you have weight reduction.
I just set this tune up, and it came out perfectly at 699.99 as per the spec sheet. Not sure what the issue is that you're having, but I've seen GT7 glitch every once in a while with the PP numbers, just not usually by that muchMy car with seemingly same settings, upgrades etc is coming in 730pp... to get it down to 700, I have to reduce ecu to 70 and power restrictor quite far down. So bhp, torque are way below yours.
Not sure what's going on as I've gone over it several times...but as no one ekse has mentioned it, assume something my end!
Wait a minute, the sheet I used has no weight reduction and no engine tuning. This is his post from a couple days agoYes I do mate. As the link takes you to tune that has screenshots with weight reduction 3 and rigidity. So I copied that.
It's exactly as laid out in tge description abd screenshots for the link posted. Hence my confusion!
No doubt I'm being a bit spoon fed here, but wanted to ensure I had it setup as the master intended. As I'm useless with tuning
I had to buy another car no weight reductions or rigidity used on new tuneYes I do mate. As the link takes you to tune that has screenshots with weight reduction 3 and rigidity. So I copied that.
It's exactly as laid out in tge description abd screenshots for the link posted. Hence my confusion!
No doubt I'm being a bit spoon fed here, but wanted to ensure I had it setup as the master intended. As I'm useless with tuning
No, there is no weight reduction and everything was perfect for me.Yes I do mate. As the link takes you to tune that has screenshots with weight reduction 3 and rigidity. So I copied that.