Pros and Cons
- Thread starter PeterJB
- 191 comments
- 11,237 views
- 5,603
- England, Warwickshire
- GTP_Sigma
Pros.
1)Nice smooth V12 engine
2)A very stylish and unique livery
3)It is among the fastest cars in the game
Cons.
1) It is well overweight for a car of its catergory, over 1.5 tonnes
2) It lacks the performance of other cars in its class
3) It is pricey for what you get, there are better performing cars out there for far less money, the Tickford V8 falcon is a great example of this.
Next car: Honda NSX 'S-zero' give it a drive before commenting on it. I want to see a really detailed review.
1)Nice smooth V12 engine
2)A very stylish and unique livery
3)It is among the fastest cars in the game
Cons.
1) It is well overweight for a car of its catergory, over 1.5 tonnes
2) It lacks the performance of other cars in its class
3) It is pricey for what you get, there are better performing cars out there for far less money, the Tickford V8 falcon is a great example of this.
Next car: Honda NSX 'S-zero' give it a drive before commenting on it. I want to see a really detailed review.
- 2,741
- Michigan
- mcluvin93hatch
Honda NSX 'S-zero
Pro's
+ Multiple colors
+ MR layout for good traction all around
+ Its a Honda and not a Acura
Con's
- Understeer's when pushed
- Has potential to spin in rain
- Aftermarket GT4 GT wings look odd on it (IMO)
Don't worry i've driven it plenty of times, so i'll add a mini review
Basically thanks to the MR setup, it likes to rotate slightly on large sweepers, just enough to point corner exit, allowing me to be on the throttle more often and with traction all around, it can be quite fast
Next Car, Gathers Drider Civic Racecar (forgot the year)
Pro's
+ Multiple colors
+ MR layout for good traction all around
+ Its a Honda and not a Acura
Con's
- Understeer's when pushed
- Has potential to spin in rain
- Aftermarket GT4 GT wings look odd on it (IMO)
Don't worry i've driven it plenty of times, so i'll add a mini review
Basically thanks to the MR setup, it likes to rotate slightly on large sweepers, just enough to point corner exit, allowing me to be on the throttle more often and with traction all around, it can be quite fast
Next Car, Gathers Drider Civic Racecar (forgot the year)
- 10,557
- Columbia, MD.
- Parnelli_Bones
- 5,481
- Seattle, WA
- RykonZero
Volvo 240 Estate
PROS
it feels awesome to get it drifting
it comes in quite a few colors
it's rather stable
CONS
it is as aerodynamic as a brick
low modification ability
look, its a brick with wheels. and its a volvo.
PROS
it feels awesome to get it drifting
it comes in quite a few colors
it's rather stable
CONS
it is as aerodynamic as a brick
low modification ability
look, its a brick with wheels. and its a volvo.
- 520
- MKV57
Uh, guys? Every time someone finishes we need them to pick a new car.
- 5,481
- Seattle, WA
- RykonZero
ew, dome zero?
PROS
it was japans first supercar
it is cool looking
and it handles ok.
CONS
woefully underpowered
aerodynamic as a Zonda
i dont think it ever went past concept stage. if it did,there arent many of them.
NEXT CAR= THE FALKEN RACING SKYLINE WITH 4WD
PROS
it was japans first supercar
it is cool looking
and it handles ok.
CONS
woefully underpowered
aerodynamic as a Zonda
i dont think it ever went past concept stage. if it did,there arent many of them.
NEXT CAR= THE FALKEN RACING SKYLINE WITH 4WD
- 5,603
- England, Warwickshire
- GTP_Sigma
Hold on can we back up a second, PROS, and er PROS,
can you specify whether areodynamics of a zonda is a pro or a con, because I would suggest it is a posotive, it has alright aero's for a car of its time, it didn't go past the concept stage, it is underpowered, but thanks to its low weight it does shift, handling OK, could you please give a slightly more descriptive note.
Have you even driven the car?
- 5,481
- Seattle, WA
- RykonZero
the aerodynamics are very un-smooth. the air has to hit rough edges. it is the oposite of the jaguar E-type. and i did. i think.
and dont do the falken. instead, do the ameyima asparadrink rx7
and dont do the falken. instead, do the ameyima asparadrink rx7
- 1,825
- Icehawk_9
First off, you have "pro's" twice, second, I already requested that car.
Driving Park
and here's my review
+its part of the falkon team, so it has a killer paint job
+its a beast
+IRL it has smart 4WD
+you can drift it preety good with stagard tires
-nothing, this is my favorite car ever!
next car Mitsubishi HSR-II concept
- 5,603
- England, Warwickshire
- GTP_Sigma
Rough edges, oh noes, its got a streamlined shape...
I fail to see how a zonda is considered bad aerodynamically.💡
handling ok, could you elaborate on it?
'I have driven it. I think.' the fact that your questioning whether you remember it may suggest that you haven't driven it, and if you cannot remember if you have driven it then would you say you are qualified to rate it?
When did you drive it.
I should let it go, but I feel in this thread we should rate a car, not toss it to the side and ask everyone to rate your car instead.
____________
As for the next car I cannot remember what it is like to drive so I will leave it for someone else to evaluate.
- 5,481
- Seattle, WA
- RykonZero
i drove it about 3 months ago. ok fine. it LOOKS un aerodynamic. and sorry.
PARAGON GT
Premium
- 1,018
- Motor City
- R MK XXV
Pro's
Plenty of horse power
Cool looking moving panels that are suppose to aid with handling
Glad that it only made it to the prototype stage.
uh . . . Thats all I remember being good about the car.
Con's
Cool looking fins and panels add nothing to handling ability of the car
(even with the driving aids off)
Styling is way to sci-fi looking
(I think that there is a Klingon symbol on the front of the car)
Only available in one ugly color.
Ok . . . Lets see here.
How about my favorite underrated American muscle car.
(much better won in the S license than from the used car lot.)
1967 Mercury Cougar XR-7
- 520
- MKV57
1998
1967 Mercury Cougar XR-7
Pros
👍 It's the '65 Mustang PD never gave us
👍 Looks a ton better than the current one (also looks gorgeous in Polar White)
👍 Despite being a luxurious Mustang, it is quite light for muscle cars
Cons
👎 Like all muscle cars, it tends to understeer
that is the only big problem with it, this is a fantastic vintage car.
- 5,603
- England, Warwickshire
- GTP_Sigma
1998
1967 Mercury Cougar XR-7
Pros
👍 It's the '65 Mustang PD never gave us
👍 Looks a ton better than the current one (also looks gorgeous in Polar White)
👍 Despite being a luxurious Mustang, it is quite light for muscle cars
Cons
👎 Like all muscle cars, it tends to understeer
that is the only big problem with it, this is a fantastic vintage car.
What about the next car?
- 520
- MKV57
Dang it, forgot.
Umm... 2003 Toyota Prius G
If that was done, someone pick one
Umm... 2003 Toyota Prius G
If that was done, someone pick one
- 53
PRO: You can Tune it only with a Muffler though
It Handles Nice
You can win the sunday cup with it
Cons: To slow
When your batterie is low you loose power
Only one gear
Next Car the 1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4
It Handles Nice
You can win the sunday cup with it
Cons: To slow
When your batterie is low you loose power
Only one gear
Next Car the 1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4
- 5,481
- Seattle, WA
- RykonZero
ok. DON'T yell at me, i recently drove this car.
1995 mitsubishi 3000GT vr-4
PROS
it has 4 wheel drive
it has a HUGE tuning ability
it looks awesome.
CONS
it understeers
slightly skittish with 900+ hp
if you give it the whole amount of power, you cannot use it as a rallycar beacause it just has too much power.
if this is vague, sorry.
Next car, jaguar xkr-r or xk coupe
1995 mitsubishi 3000GT vr-4
PROS
it has 4 wheel drive
it has a HUGE tuning ability
it looks awesome.
CONS
it understeers
slightly skittish with 900+ hp
if you give it the whole amount of power, you cannot use it as a rallycar beacause it just has too much power.
if this is vague, sorry.
Next car, jaguar xkr-r or xk coupe
- 5,632
- Malaysia
- MuzaffarMusa
Jaguar XKR R Performance
👍 Pros:
1.More faster than the standard XK model
2.Looks good (in my opinion)
3.Handles quite well when stock
👎 Cons:
1.Little horsepower compared to other sport cars
2.Easily smoked by Aston Martins and TVR's
3.Limited color choices (unlike TVR)
up next:Opel Tigra
👍 Pros:
1.More faster than the standard XK model
2.Looks good (in my opinion)
3.Handles quite well when stock
👎 Cons:
1.Little horsepower compared to other sport cars
2.Easily smoked by Aston Martins and TVR's
3.Limited color choices (unlike TVR)
up next:Opel Tigra
PARAGON GT
Premium
- 1,018
- Motor City
- R MK XXV
Ok . . . Lets see.
Pro's:tup:
Very sporty looking
Comes in an array of colors
Con's:tdown:
Not capable of winning events right off the lot. (Looks faster than it is)
Performance suffers from the FF drivetrain
LOW maximum HP available.
Lets see here. What to do next . . .
How about . . .
Alfa Romeo GT 3.2 V6 24V 2004
Or, if that was done how about the Ford Escort Rally Car 1998
- 5,603
- England, Warwickshire
- GTP_Sigma
Audi Quattro '82
Pros:
1) First ever 4WD car.
2) The car has a very successful rallying history.
3) Even stock, the car is very stable in cornering.
4) Its is a very cool car.
Cons:
1) The car doesn't really impressive with the speed I was expecting.
2) The car isn't the coolest version of the quattro.
3) The stock version has a tendency to understeer.
Pros:
1) First ever 4WD car.
2) The car has a very successful rallying history.
3) Even stock, the car is very stable in cornering.
4) Its is a very cool car.
Cons:
1) The car doesn't really impressive with the speed I was expecting.
2) The car isn't the coolest version of the quattro.
3) The stock version has a tendency to understeer.
- 520
- MKV57
Bwahah! You forgot this time! 
Leonidae
(Banned)
- 6,881
- GTP_Leonidae_MFT
Umm.. No. First ever 4WD's were made early in the beginning of 1900's. I think oyu meant that Audi Quattro was first ever 4WD rallycar..
PARAGON GT
Premium
- 1,018
- Motor City
- R MK XXV
Bwahah! You forgot this time!
Well since he didn't. How about the Ford Escort Rally Car 1998
Similar threads
