(which is its [PS3's] major selling point as supposedly a reasoning behind its price!)
Supposedly? Cell Processor, Blu-ray, 60GB HDD, WiFi, HDMI 1.3, Card Reader, etc. these all cost money. The Blu-ray player alone was worth the price, as the CHEAPEST Blu-ray player when the PS3 came out was $1,000 - and even now, the cheapest Blu-ray player currently available sells for $500,
(over $1,000 in the UK) and that's the less then impressive 1st gen Samsung player which doesn't perform nearly as well as the PS3 as a player.
..... as Sprite pointed out EA seem to LOVE doing this [dumbing down XB360 ports for the PS3]!
I agree, that if that's the case, then we would suffer. On the other hand, although he didn't mean to do it,
Duck's screen shots showed that the PS3 version of Def Jam: Icon looks much better then the XB360 version:
Duck's Screenshot of XB360 Version
Duck's Screenshot of PS3 Version
So like I said then, if this is what people consider terrible ports for the PS3, then sign me up. I'll take higher contrast, better sharpness, less blooming, and more detail any day of the week.
I love it. MS gives you 6 times the hard drive space, a cooler running 360, and HDMI (and a cooler black casing) for $80....yet charges $50 for a 512MB Memory unit, and $99 for a 20GB HDD? Fricking hilarious.
It also uses a better DVD drive from Samsung as well.
What's worse for the current XB360 owners is that Microsoft could have, and should have released the XB360 from the beginning with a digital output, specifically HDMI.
However, even this version of the XB360 looks dubious as well. Anyone who thinks Microsoft isn't going to release a future version of the XB360 without support of high capacity games isn't paying attention to what is going on now in regards to game development, and is not aware that every year for the last ten years, games are coming out needing more and more disc space, and some have already surpassed the limits of SD DVD, as used in the XB360.