Thanks guys.
Pretty efficient so far too... only 577 lines of code @ 135KB of disk (that will pork up a bit once we start sprinkling graphics around).
... though there's always room for more optimization.
Awesome, good to hear. đź‘ŤThanks to CSL my PB is now down to a 2:15.7
RedReevos qualified earlier, google docs blow my mind though, times in there, sorry it's not aligned properly or sorted properly guys.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...GJjVnc0Vjh1WHlkRDZzYUhQNWZZbWc&hl=en_US#gid=2
đź‘Ť
there are definitely places to abuse the boundaries to your advantage.
places to watch:
* cutting Eau Rouge = very significant time gain in sector 1
* running wide out exiting the 90° left (Turn8) after Rivage = minor time gain
* running wide in Pouhon is illegal but it won't gain you any time
* going outside the kerb exiting Curve de Paul Frere will gain almost as much as cutting Eau Rouge due to compounding speed down the straight
* running wide in Blanchemont will gain a few tenths if done intentionally, accidentally it will cost.
* cutting the bus stop chicane is also very easy to do and pick up lots of time
here's a track map for those who haven't been watching F1 like a religion for the last decade or so.
. 
.
Tony he meant T9 I believe the 90 degree left but as he said its minor time gain if any for a huge increase of spining I try my best to stay off it...
Also ill be quallifing at some point tonight as I planned on the first week but the net had other ideas
It's always two wheels on rumbles, though like Doc, I would prefer 2 wheels on asphalt myself as well. Especially for Eau Rouge, where you can put all 4 on the huge rumble strip. But the rules are the rules, so I usually use as much as possible there to carry extra speed down the straight.
That would be where I crashed on lap 2 of my quali, and I only had 2 in the dirt.1. If we go by the usual OLR rules you just have to keep two wheels on the kerbing. (personally I hate that method, and always try to keep two wheels on the asphalt... but it is the GTP standard that's been around for years.)
2. If you run wide in Blanchemont intentionally you're carrying more speed by using less steering input. If you go wide by accident you're generally still scrubbing speed but just got the turn-in point a bit wrong so the extra distance costs a tenth or two.
oopse... yeah I meant T9 as that's the left after Rivage.
and yeah, running wide there is a crap shoot whether you're going to gain time from carrying more speed or spin the rears and have to recover or hit the wall.
