Tacet_Blue
On the origin of the Bible, the King of Judea had it written as a political statement, and he wanted to state the importance of his own Kingdom.
At this time it had no structure, no verses or chapters, it was re-written every year, new parts included, some parts excluded.
The Bible as we know today, with its Gospels and chapters was actually first written buy a Roman emperor in
AD 340, and known as the Codex Vaticanus. He wanted to bring order to it, and have a single book, rather than many versions, he also added his own beliefs and threw away ones he didn't like
The Gospel according to Mary (which turned up on the German black market ) is still rebuked by Christians, as it paints a very different picture. There are other Gospels that have been lost over the years, or deliberately thrown away as the direction of the religion changes.
All the Gospels contradict each other, few people actually read the whole Bible, so they are not aware. Take for example the most famous story, the Nativity. Two Gospels (Luke and John) fail to mention the birth of Christ at all, they start with Jesus as a man. Matthew and Mark mention the birth, but only Matthew talks about wise men and Shepherds.
It has been said that if the Gospels were eye witness accounts for a murder...with so many discrepancies, it would not even make it to court
So, you're assuming contradiction because the stories start at different points in the life of Christ?
I bet your mother's story of your birth and your father's story are quite a bit different. And they were likely in the same room at the same time.
In other words/or, For example, if you prefer, if I see something from the air, and you see something from the ground, and someone else sees the same event from the sea, our stories are supposed to be exactly the same?
Matthew saw a lot of what happened in the life of Jesus, Mark saw some of the same stuff, and some different stuff, Luke saw some different things as well, and being a doctor, probably had a different, more clinical view of things.
Just because two ouf your friends know about you, doesn't mean if they set out to tell the story of a part of your life, they will tell exactly the same things.
The gospels do not contradict each other, and the main
theme of the gospels remains the same.
On the subjects of pork and alcohol.
The Bible doesn't say anywhere not to eat pork. There is a parable where a sheet full of animals both "clean" and "unclean" is let down before Peter, and he is told to rise up, kill, and eat.
In the book of Romans the 14th chapter is says don't eat of certain things, if by doing so you will cause another to sin.
Christ turned water into wine for a wedding feast, and the qualifications of a deacon, say a man wishing to be a deacon should not be given to
much wine. Also Luke told Timothy to take a little wine for his stomach's sake.
Drunkeness is condemned, but not drinking. Probably because not all water supplies were safe to drink from in that day as well as this one.
I'd like to believe that the tenet of the Bible is that it's okay to eat pork, and drink alcohol as long as you don't let either thing control you, and your doing so does not cause another to sin.