- 4,552
- Australia
They should include tracks like Charade that pass as tarmac rally stages. That way it can be run in forward or reverse. Same for running sections of Nurburgring and Bathurst as stages.
I used to really enjoy rallying ever since its inception in GT2. It probably started to become a little less fun around GT4 with the repeat special events, but the prize cars were always worth the effort. It still had its charm all the way through.
But for myself, and many, GT was a gateway to other motorsports growing up, even if it doesn't specialize or do it particularly well. Before GT it was nothing, and after playing GT growing up, if I really liked the rallying aspect and wanted to see more of it, I'd begin watching the real WRC, or go play Colin McRae, and later on, DiRT, which I did. At no point did I enjoy these more realistic iterations of rallying and think 'damn GT's rally experience was rubbish, why did they try?', not while it initially piqued my curiosity, all the while helping to romanticize so many iconic rally cars over the years. I'm older now, but a younger generation will probably get the same experience out of playing GT7.
Plus, if it's already there in the game, why leave it out?
Something tells me that rally is definitely here to stay whether we like it or not, what with the Pikes Peak licensing. I do hope that the partnership with Michelin will help with how cars grip all surfaces, tarmac and otherwise. But I really do like the idea of a "Gr.C" for pre-Group B rally cars like the Lancia Stratos, and a "Gr.A" for more modern, WRC rally cars, especially those that were seen in the PS3 era like the Citroen C4 WRC.
As there is only one Group B. But you knew I was referring to GT’s designations, right?There is only one group C...
![]()
I want to agree, but I do think the "Gr.[letter]" naming theme could be good for various classes of rally cars. Although that said, they could always just pick a different letter, or even use more than one letter. Like for modern rally cars, it could be Gr.WRC instead of Gr.A. Or maybe Gr.R, for "Rally"? And then there could be a "Gr.RV" for pre-Group B cars - i.e. Vintage Rally - like the Lancia Stratos. It'd be similar to an idea I had for a "Gr.1V" and "Gr.3V" for vintage prototypes like the Ferrari 330 P4 and vintage grand tourers like the Shelby Daytona Coupe, respectively.I know. But naming Group C some rally cars would be weird and misleading for many petrolheads![]()
Just found this video of someone hacking GTS to make one of the main menu background animation track drivable. Turns out PD knows how to make a proper touge/rally stage after all! Imagine the course generator from GT5 or the track maker from GT6 if we can make a road this narrow, you can pretty much create a rally game with infinite stages
There was an attempt.They seemed to grasp the concept of rallying in GT5, but executed it terribly and learned nothing.
Agreed, but I really do think rally is here to stay. Hopefully we'll get more than just racing on dirt/snow circuits, and instead, more events in the vein of a time attack, which does seem likely given the also-likely addition of Pikes Peak. I'd honestly prefer that PD scrap the dirt/snow courses that are circuits and instead have point-to-point stages.I like the idea, but I feel like it needs more work than it can reasonably be given as a part of the main game. Making even a moderately decent rally experience isn't super easy. I'd prefer it to be spun off into it's own game (Gran Rallismo!) or at least made as like a major ~$30 DLC, because then it would justify the time and effort in development that would make it a really good experience. As it is it's going to continue being brown tarmac with the grip modifiers turned way down, and driving on real dirt, gravel and snow is so much more engaging than that.
That very well might change with the Michelin partnership. But even if it doesn't, I don't think rally is going anywhere - for better and for worse. Personally, I still think it has potential for expansion, especially the idea of new classes for post-Group B and pre-Group B rally cars, respectively such as the Suzuki Escudo Pikes Peak and the Lancia Stratos Rally Car. And that's before we mention the likely inclusion of Pikes Peak itself. I don't think it's just a matter of GT sponsoring it, either, as I recall another franchise (I think it was DiRT?) mentioning that they couldn't get Pikes Peak for their latest installment due to license exclusivity. So that could be fun, even if Pikes Peak has been paved over. Though maybe they'll include a historic version of Pikes Peak, when it was mostly dirt, since historic versions of famous courses isn't anything new for PD - just look at Brands Hatch and Monza.Without a complete overhaul of the dirt physics the cars they include is basically a moot point. It will never be fun with the current physics.
That very well might change with the Michelin partnership. But even if it doesn't, I don't think rally is going anywhere - for better and for worse. Personally, I still think it has potential for expansion, especially the idea of new classes for post-Group B and pre-Group B rally cars, respectively such as the Suzuki Escudo Pikes Peak and the Lancia Stratos Rally Car. And that's before we mention the likely inclusion of Pikes Peak itself. I don't think it's just a matter of GT sponsoring it, either, as I recall another franchise (I think it was DiRT?) mentioning that they couldn't get Pikes Peak for their latest installment due to license exclusivity. So that could be fun, even if Pikes Peak has been paved over. Though maybe they'll include a historic version of Pikes Peak, when it was mostly dirt, since historic versions of famous courses isn't anything new for PD - just look at Brands Hatch and Monza.
I think there's real potential for it to be different, between the Michelin partnership and the likely inclusion of Pikes Peak.All I'm saying is if they're not going to massively improve the physics and the tracks then I'd rather they don't waste time on adding more rally cars. As you say though, I doubt they'll break their habits and we will indeed just get the same guff with some new cars for the 7th time.
The rally in GT are bad about their physics primarily. GT2's rally physics back then resemble the physics on GT1, then GT3 and onwards have the soap effect for the cars in rally. I've played Dirt Rally 2.0 and the cars aren't sliding that much like here. GT5 was the one game that has point-to-point system in Gran Turismo Rally, I think that's the step in the right direction.I'm really late for this discussion, but better late than never.
Well, as much as I enjoyed the rally time trials on Gran Turismo 2 back when I was a kid, the general interest was slowly decreasing, and now basically no one cares about it on GT Sport. With that said, I feel the rally NEEDS some big improvement for GT7, it absolutely CANNOT be a copy-paste from GT Sport. If it turns out to be that copy-paste, expect yet another failure from PD.
In my opinion, there are two main ways to revive the interest on rally for Gran Turismo 7:
The first one is probably what people are wishing for the most: a proper point-to-point stage system with more in-depth rally features. I'm essentially talking a mini Dirt Rally/WRC inside GT7. That would be more than enough to increase the interest of players, including me.
The second way is "simply" bringing back the classic rally tracks. If they really don't want to create something new, at least bring back some long-running names such as Smokey Mountain, Swiss Alps or Tahiti Maze. These are waaaaaay better rally tracks than the GT Sport ones, plus you get that nostalgia factor.
In short, it's either you go with a major reimagination or with a high dose of nostalgia. I can't see things going well on the other way around.
Not going to happen.But we also should consider licensing for the actual WRC series, too, which would likely include the vehicles used.
https://www.gtplanet.net/next-gran-turismo-will-be-a-combination-of-past-present-and-future/I hate it. It's static and the track limits make it so damn unrealistic.
PD still don't get it. We're not playing GT2 anymore.