- 3,212
#1: Nope.
#2: Nope.
#3: Natch.
Go.
#2: Nope.
#3: Natch.
Go.
Rate A Car
- Thread starter chronix13
- 1,371 comments
- 101,007 views
- 3,212
Oh.
Well, to decide, how about we flip this coin?
Heads: C-Class Touring Car
Tails: Nissan Primera
And it's...
That's not the point, is it?
All right then, just go ahead with the Nissan Primera, whilst I correct my post.
Well, to decide, how about we flip this coin?
Heads: C-Class Touring Car
Tails: Nissan Primera
And it's...
That's not the point, is it?
All right then, just go ahead with the Nissan Primera, whilst I correct my post.
I generally don't like those "kei" cars, I don't understand what's the deal of putting so many little city-cars in a racing sim... Concerning Mira TR-XX - it's pretty cool, good power to weight ratio, clear handling, but nothing special... Maybe I'm just the wrong person to rate this type of cars 
57/100
Next car: Lotus Esprit GT1
[upd] By the way, I'd be glad if someone more skilled than me would rate any kei car better and tell us and me why did he do that I mean, why there are so many kei cars here (if not to take general overrepresentation of japanese cars).
57/100
Next car: Lotus Esprit GT1
[upd] By the way, I'd be glad if someone more skilled than me would rate any kei car better and tell us and me why did he do that
I mean, why there are so many kei cars here (if not to take general overrepresentation of japanese cars).
- 10,557
- Columbia, MD.
- Parnelli_Bones
I agree. I mean, I think some of them are cool, but half of them aren't my cup of tea. But then again, PD is a Japanese company. Perhaps over in Japan they get all excited about keis.
88/100
Extremely fast, slick, and looks like something a witch would take a ride in! Lightweight, you can modify it without a race-kit.
Downside: expensive. Extremely twitchy/nervous...great for pros but newbs beware.
But I rate it highly.[/quote]
[upd] By the way, I'd be glad if someone more skilled than me would rate any kei car better and tell us and me why did he do that
Maybe I will later on. As I said, i really like some keis (Suzuki Cappucino, Mitsubishi Pajero, and a few others) but most of them collect cyberdust!
Next car: I picked this at random off of Pupik's list on www.formulanone.org/gt2
'93 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec
Last edited:
- 3,212
BMW 323ti Compact: 87/100
A quirky little car, really fun to drive. Sad that a racing package did not come with it, though. Being the only compact by BMW in this game and the only car present in GT2 on the E36 chassis, it is also very unique. looks correctly proportioned for a downsized car, if a little mutated.
Next car: (speaking of BMW...) BMW 750iL
A quirky little car, really fun to drive. Sad that a racing package did not come with it, though. Being the only compact by BMW in this game and the only car present in GT2 on the E36 chassis, it is also very unique. looks correctly proportioned for a downsized car, if a little mutated.
Next car: (speaking of BMW...) BMW 750iL
- 3,212
Ah, you were right. I was thinking of the 750iL, the more infamous BMW, but I meant the 740iL.
Go.
Go.
- 10,557
- Columbia, MD.
- Parnelli_Bones
BMW 750iL
What's it like to race a true executive-class Beemer?
I drove this machine briefly a couple years back...always fun to drive something I see local yupsters cruising in.
I think GT2 is the only game that has this 4-door, which makes it unique. 👍
Can be modded past 400 horses 👍
Looks good even with crappy PS1 graphix 👍
Great BMW engine sound. 👍
V8 torque great out of corners 👍
Now the bads
HEAVY 👎
No race kit available 👎
Average "non-BMW" brake response 👎
Sluggish straight-line acceleration despite V8 power 👎
Newbs should stay away. Intermediates will need almost all the availble mods to make this one race-worthy 👎
Can't change wheels 👎
400-ish horsepower not enough to make this one a star except in the hands of the capable 👎
Beemers are known for their nimble, chameleon-like handling. This one (with its weight) maneuvers more like a Lincoln or something 👎
Summary: Fun to drive & race, unique, but its weight overcomes it in the long run.
40/100
Next Car--I been driving this in GT4 lately: '84 Toyota Celica Supra (used car lot-the game calls it the '84 Celica I think)
What's it like to race a true executive-class Beemer?
I drove this machine briefly a couple years back...always fun to drive something I see local yupsters cruising in.I think GT2 is the only game that has this 4-door, which makes it unique. 👍
Can be modded past 400 horses 👍
Looks good even with crappy PS1 graphix 👍
Great BMW engine sound. 👍
V8 torque great out of corners 👍
Now the bads
HEAVY 👎
No race kit available 👎
Average "non-BMW" brake response 👎
Sluggish straight-line acceleration despite V8 power 👎
Newbs should stay away. Intermediates will need almost all the availble mods to make this one race-worthy 👎
Can't change wheels 👎
400-ish horsepower not enough to make this one a star except in the hands of the capable 👎
Beemers are known for their nimble, chameleon-like handling. This one (with its weight) maneuvers more like a Lincoln or something 👎
Summary: Fun to drive & race, unique, but its weight overcomes it in the long run.
40/100
Next Car--I been driving this in GT4 lately: '84 Toyota Celica Supra (used car lot-the game calls it the '84 Celica I think)
Last edited:
- 3,212
Toyota Supra Celica 1984: 76/100.
The oddball of the Toyota lineups in GT2 (bar the elusive 2000GT), this car seems to show up below the radar of the racing world of GT2. Sure, there are your 1982 Corvettes, your Mazda RX-7 GT Turbos (another furtive car) and even your Datsuns, but none capture the styling and the mystique of the 1984 Celica (maybe the 1983 Mazda).
Best of all, you can tune it and race-modify it, and it can do 178mph!
But, for all its greatness, the better-known Mazda outdoes it, and ultimately overshadows it. Could this be why it seems so obscure in GT2?
Next car: Its adversary, the 1983 Mazda RX-7 GT Turbo!
The oddball of the Toyota lineups in GT2 (bar the elusive 2000GT), this car seems to show up below the radar of the racing world of GT2. Sure, there are your 1982 Corvettes, your Mazda RX-7 GT Turbos (another furtive car) and even your Datsuns, but none capture the styling and the mystique of the 1984 Celica (maybe the 1983 Mazda).
Best of all, you can tune it and race-modify it, and it can do 178mph!
But, for all its greatness, the better-known Mazda outdoes it, and ultimately overshadows it. Could this be why it seems so obscure in GT2?
Next car: Its adversary, the 1983 Mazda RX-7 GT Turbo!
Orion
(Banned)
- 1,518
It is capable of 160MPH stock if I remember correctly, and it only had around 157HP! It is lightweight and well balanced, just like a RX-7 should be. Great car for beginner drivers and beginner drifters. Let's not forget that turbo it came with.
90/100.Next: Lister Storm V12, if that was done, then RUF Turbo R.
Rotary Junkie
Premium
- 9,810
- Canton, MI
- RJs_RX-7
Lister Storm V12:
Looks quite good
Goes HARD
Decent handling
FR despite somewhat MRish bodywork
JAG POWERED!
Isn't quite as affordable as I'd like
I can't think up enough cons.
Next: Vector W8 or RUF CTR2 Sport if done already. If both are done, RUF Turbo R.
Looks quite good
Goes HARD
Decent handling
FR despite somewhat MRish bodywork
JAG POWERED!
Isn't quite as affordable as I'd like
I can't think up enough cons.
Next: Vector W8 or RUF CTR2 Sport if done already. If both are done, RUF Turbo R.
- 3,948
- Sturgis, MI
- GTP_ty00123
Wiegert Vector W8 Twin Turbo...
Pros:
634 horsepower stock...most out of any non-race MR car, I believe 👍
Odd, but awesome styling 👍
Can do 175 mph in 2nd 👍
Good novelty value:tup:
Cons:
420,000 credits, a little much for this car IMO 👎
"Only" 3 gears 👎
No RM 👎
Can't use it for much, and it's outclassed in what it can be used for 👎
Handles like a train, except worse, without any suspension tuning 👎
Overall: 60/100
Alright, let's just get the RUF Turbo R over with.
Pros:
634 horsepower stock...most out of any non-race MR car, I believe 👍
Odd, but awesome styling 👍
Can do 175 mph in 2nd 👍
Good novelty value:tup:
Cons:
420,000 credits, a little much for this car IMO 👎
"Only" 3 gears 👎
No RM 👎
Can't use it for much, and it's outclassed in what it can be used for 👎
Handles like a train, except worse, without any suspension tuning 👎
Overall: 60/100
Alright, let's just get the RUF Turbo R over with.
- 1,051
- London
- JohnsonCapote
hmm...possibly offtopic, but there is an MR road car that produces more HP..the infamous Ford GT90 (726hp)...but does that count? sorry im being nitpicky here lol
Orion
(Banned)
- 1,518
That Vector can get tuned past 730HP, I don't remember if the Ford GT90 could.
RUF Turbo R
It is 4WD, even though I was expecting it to be RR.
It can be almost as dominant as the RUF CTR2.
Very fast car, it's expensive because it's a RUF, but you know you get the typical RUF high speed, smooth handling, and neck-braking acceleration from it's RR/4WD engines.
The bad part is you can't tune it too much, only around 530HP or so. It is also 440,000Cr stock, but worth it IMO.
95/100.
Next: Mercedes CLK 320 Sport.
- 10,557
- Columbia, MD.
- Parnelli_Bones
YEah this is so true. good point. I sometimes forget the 2nd-gen Supra is in GT2.
- 3,212
Mercedes CLK 320 Sport: 68/100
A conservative sedan... perhaps a bit too conservative. It costs that much more for a 'Sport' version of the CLK 320, and yet for many, the value is lost. Its performance, from what I recall, was only marginally better, and it shared the same appearance as less expensive cars slotted into the line-up of Mercedes-Benz. Even the AMG C43 was distinguishable...
That's not to say it's still a solid car, though, just to say that it's less solid than expected.
Next Car: Nissan March Superturbo (1991?)
A conservative sedan... perhaps a bit too conservative. It costs that much more for a 'Sport' version of the CLK 320, and yet for many, the value is lost. Its performance, from what I recall, was only marginally better, and it shared the same appearance as less expensive cars slotted into the line-up of Mercedes-Benz. Even the AMG C43 was distinguishable...
That's not to say it's still a solid car, though, just to say that it's less solid than expected.
Next Car: Nissan March Superturbo (1991?)
Orion
(Banned)
- 1,518
March Super Turbo
Pros
Unique but cool sound. 👍
Like it's name says, it's turbo'd and supercharged. 👍
It may be FF, but since it's low powered it makes for one hell of a fun car on Motorsports Land. 👍
Cons
Somewhat boring and plain RM. 👎
It is not that easy to drift, without PLENTY of tuning. 👎
Well can't think of any real cons.
88/100
Next Car: FIAT Punto GT, one of the best cars on Motorsports land IMO, especially fully tuned.
EDIT: Cool, this post was made at 5:10PM.
Pros
Unique but cool sound. 👍
Like it's name says, it's turbo'd and supercharged. 👍
It may be FF, but since it's low powered it makes for one hell of a fun car on Motorsports Land. 👍
Cons
Somewhat boring and plain RM. 👎
It is not that easy to drift, without PLENTY of tuning. 👎
Well can't think of any real cons.
88/100
Next Car: FIAT Punto GT, one of the best cars on Motorsports land IMO, especially fully tuned.
EDIT: Cool, this post was made at 5:10PM.
- 3,212
Well, you can. It is just not as straight-forward as drifting a rear-wheel drive car. There are probably more settings that interfere with drifting a March Superturbo than most, so that may be what racerx510 means.
P.S: Yes, racerx510, that is very cool indeed.
P.S: Yes, racerx510, that is very cool indeed.
- 192
Rate This! if it hasnt been rated already.
Nismo Skyline GTR 4-door
ill start with my attack on it.
Pros.
good power stock. unique. cool bodykit. 4WD
Cons.
Heavy. slow. understeer
84/100
Nismo Skyline GTR 4-door
ill start with my attack on it.
Pros.
good power stock. unique. cool bodykit. 4WD
Cons.
Heavy. slow. understeer
84/100
- 3,212
Next Car?
I have to agree with you on your ratings, but heavy? With understeer?
I have to agree with you on your ratings, but heavy? With understeer?
- 192
Its 4WD and its a GTR. quite heavy for a nismo.
- 10,557
- Columbia, MD.
- Parnelli_Bones
Since you rated the car, you get to choose the next one for someone else to rage. I mean RATE.
- 192
The MX5 with the red lettering on it from the A License if it exists or if it doesnt Spoon S2000.
- 3,212
Sounds good:
(Estimated if it exists)
Mazda MX-5 D-Rights Car- 79/100
The car is still a Miata (or an MX-5): it still is slow on the straights, and it could be better-looking. However, that's not to say that it would not be a cracker to drive in a twisty or technically-demanding circuit or course (it would have loved the Eigen Loop.). The red lettering, while not particularly performance-enhancing, makes it that bit special.
Of course, this is the only Miata with red lettering that I know of.
Next Car: Mazda RX-7 Turbo 1983
(Estimated if it exists)
Mazda MX-5 D-Rights Car- 79/100
The car is still a Miata (or an MX-5): it still is slow on the straights, and it could be better-looking. However, that's not to say that it would not be a cracker to drive in a twisty or technically-demanding circuit or course (it would have loved the Eigen Loop.). The red lettering, while not particularly performance-enhancing, makes it that bit special.
Of course, this is the only Miata with red lettering that I know of.
Next Car: Mazda RX-7 Turbo 1983
